Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › define “speculator”
- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM #12900May 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM #214360PeaceParticipant
To make it more clear:
for the purpose of NOT qualifying for a bail-out
May 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM #214517PeaceParticipantTo make it more clear:
for the purpose of NOT qualifying for a bail-out
May 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM #214437PeaceParticipantTo make it more clear:
for the purpose of NOT qualifying for a bail-out
May 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM #214488PeaceParticipantTo make it more clear:
for the purpose of NOT qualifying for a bail-out
May 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM #214462PeaceParticipantTo make it more clear:
for the purpose of NOT qualifying for a bail-out
May 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM #214370sdduuuudeParticipantFor the purposes of qualifying for a bailout, I would say everyone is a speculator and nobody gets one !
Seriously, one test could be – is the home owner-occupied ?
May 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM #214527sdduuuudeParticipantFor the purposes of qualifying for a bailout, I would say everyone is a speculator and nobody gets one !
Seriously, one test could be – is the home owner-occupied ?
May 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM #214498sdduuuudeParticipantFor the purposes of qualifying for a bailout, I would say everyone is a speculator and nobody gets one !
Seriously, one test could be – is the home owner-occupied ?
May 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM #214446sdduuuudeParticipantFor the purposes of qualifying for a bailout, I would say everyone is a speculator and nobody gets one !
Seriously, one test could be – is the home owner-occupied ?
May 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM #214472sdduuuudeParticipantFor the purposes of qualifying for a bailout, I would say everyone is a speculator and nobody gets one !
Seriously, one test could be – is the home owner-occupied ?
May 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM #214533daveljParticipantYeah, I’d start with the issue of the home being owner occupied. Then I’d add one more criterion: Did the the buyer put down at least a 10% down payment. Despite the fact that many people may have made a horrible decision to buy at the top and put down 10%, I would not put these folks into the speculator bucket. And if we’ve resigned ourselves to the fact that we’re going to bail folks out (with which I disagree), then let’s at least have the decency to limit it to folks who put some money down and are actually living in their homes. Anything non-owner occupied or having less than a 10% down payment, in my opinion, should not be bailed out. Period.
May 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM #214503daveljParticipantYeah, I’d start with the issue of the home being owner occupied. Then I’d add one more criterion: Did the the buyer put down at least a 10% down payment. Despite the fact that many people may have made a horrible decision to buy at the top and put down 10%, I would not put these folks into the speculator bucket. And if we’ve resigned ourselves to the fact that we’re going to bail folks out (with which I disagree), then let’s at least have the decency to limit it to folks who put some money down and are actually living in their homes. Anything non-owner occupied or having less than a 10% down payment, in my opinion, should not be bailed out. Period.
May 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM #214476daveljParticipantYeah, I’d start with the issue of the home being owner occupied. Then I’d add one more criterion: Did the the buyer put down at least a 10% down payment. Despite the fact that many people may have made a horrible decision to buy at the top and put down 10%, I would not put these folks into the speculator bucket. And if we’ve resigned ourselves to the fact that we’re going to bail folks out (with which I disagree), then let’s at least have the decency to limit it to folks who put some money down and are actually living in their homes. Anything non-owner occupied or having less than a 10% down payment, in my opinion, should not be bailed out. Period.
May 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM #214454daveljParticipantYeah, I’d start with the issue of the home being owner occupied. Then I’d add one more criterion: Did the the buyer put down at least a 10% down payment. Despite the fact that many people may have made a horrible decision to buy at the top and put down 10%, I would not put these folks into the speculator bucket. And if we’ve resigned ourselves to the fact that we’re going to bail folks out (with which I disagree), then let’s at least have the decency to limit it to folks who put some money down and are actually living in their homes. Anything non-owner occupied or having less than a 10% down payment, in my opinion, should not be bailed out. Period.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.