- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by .
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Certainly, in the eyes of the law, it’s not fraud. I would not even casually refer to it as fraud. It’s a voluntary breach of contract with respect to the existing home loans, with built-in remedies for the lenders. That’s it as far as I can see.
Certainly, in the eyes of the law, it’s not fraud. I would not even casually refer to it as fraud. It’s a voluntary breach of contract with respect to the existing home loans, with built-in remedies for the lenders. That’s it as far as I can see.
Certainly, in the eyes of the law, it’s not fraud. I would not even casually refer to it as fraud. It’s a voluntary breach of contract with respect to the existing home loans, with built-in remedies for the lenders. That’s it as far as I can see.
Certainly, in the eyes of the law, it’s not fraud. I would not even casually refer to it as fraud. It’s a voluntary breach of contract with respect to the existing home loans, with built-in remedies for the lenders. That’s it as far as I can see.
Certainly, in the eyes of the law, it’s not fraud. I would not even casually refer to it as fraud. It’s a voluntary breach of contract with respect to the existing home loans, with built-in remedies for the lenders. That’s it as far as I can see.