- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
kaycee.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 15, 2007 at 7:00 AM #10907November 15, 2007 at 7:07 AM #99666
4plexowner
ParticipantAll of the paper that has been written on top of real estate mortgages (both residential and commercial) is worthless trash
This judge appears to agree with me
November 15, 2007 at 7:07 AM #99740ParticipantAll of the paper that has been written on top of real estate mortgages (both residential and commercial) is worthless trash
This judge appears to agree with me
November 15, 2007 at 7:07 AM #99758ParticipantAll of the paper that has been written on top of real estate mortgages (both residential and commercial) is worthless trash
This judge appears to agree with me
November 15, 2007 at 7:07 AM #99769ParticipantAll of the paper that has been written on top of real estate mortgages (both residential and commercial) is worthless trash
This judge appears to agree with me
November 15, 2007 at 7:07 AM #99776ParticipantAll of the paper that has been written on top of real estate mortgages (both residential and commercial) is worthless trash
This judge appears to agree with me
November 15, 2007 at 8:22 AM #99808Daniel
ParticipantHi folks,
Tanta at Calculated Risk has written no less than 3 very long and informative posts on this issue over the past couple of days. Highly recommended reading for anyone who wants to know how these things work. If you don’t care that much about technicalities, and only want to know the conclusion, here it is: this case is not such a big deal, and it’s been blown out of proportion by some uninformed blog writer, duly followed by the NYT. It’s simply a case of Deutsche Bank mishandling some paperwork. The lawsuit was dismissed “without prejudice”, which means DB can re-file when they get their paperwork sorted out (which they undoubtely will). End of story.
November 15, 2007 at 8:22 AM #99826ParticipantHi folks,
Tanta at Calculated Risk has written no less than 3 very long and informative posts on this issue over the past couple of days. Highly recommended reading for anyone who wants to know how these things work. If you don’t care that much about technicalities, and only want to know the conclusion, here it is: this case is not such a big deal, and it’s been blown out of proportion by some uninformed blog writer, duly followed by the NYT. It’s simply a case of Deutsche Bank mishandling some paperwork. The lawsuit was dismissed “without prejudice”, which means DB can re-file when they get their paperwork sorted out (which they undoubtely will). End of story.
November 15, 2007 at 8:22 AM #99820ParticipantHi folks,
Tanta at Calculated Risk has written no less than 3 very long and informative posts on this issue over the past couple of days. Highly recommended reading for anyone who wants to know how these things work. If you don’t care that much about technicalities, and only want to know the conclusion, here it is: this case is not such a big deal, and it’s been blown out of proportion by some uninformed blog writer, duly followed by the NYT. It’s simply a case of Deutsche Bank mishandling some paperwork. The lawsuit was dismissed “without prejudice”, which means DB can re-file when they get their paperwork sorted out (which they undoubtely will). End of story.
November 15, 2007 at 8:22 AM #99790ParticipantHi folks,
Tanta at Calculated Risk has written no less than 3 very long and informative posts on this issue over the past couple of days. Highly recommended reading for anyone who wants to know how these things work. If you don’t care that much about technicalities, and only want to know the conclusion, here it is: this case is not such a big deal, and it’s been blown out of proportion by some uninformed blog writer, duly followed by the NYT. It’s simply a case of Deutsche Bank mishandling some paperwork. The lawsuit was dismissed “without prejudice”, which means DB can re-file when they get their paperwork sorted out (which they undoubtely will). End of story.
November 15, 2007 at 8:22 AM #99715ParticipantHi folks,
Tanta at Calculated Risk has written no less than 3 very long and informative posts on this issue over the past couple of days. Highly recommended reading for anyone who wants to know how these things work. If you don’t care that much about technicalities, and only want to know the conclusion, here it is: this case is not such a big deal, and it’s been blown out of proportion by some uninformed blog writer, duly followed by the NYT. It’s simply a case of Deutsche Bank mishandling some paperwork. The lawsuit was dismissed “without prejudice”, which means DB can re-file when they get their paperwork sorted out (which they undoubtely will). End of story.
November 15, 2007 at 9:13 AM #99807patientlywaiting
ParticipantGood point, Daniel.
But the example means the industry is in disarray. The risk management systems did not work. And now the asset management systems aren’t working either. Fixing them will cost money and more losses.
How much is the monthly carrying cost on 1 house? Multiply that by millions and by several months.
November 15, 2007 at 9:13 AM #99732ParticipantGood point, Daniel.
But the example means the industry is in disarray. The risk management systems did not work. And now the asset management systems aren’t working either. Fixing them will cost money and more losses.
How much is the monthly carrying cost on 1 house? Multiply that by millions and by several months.
November 15, 2007 at 9:13 AM #99827ParticipantGood point, Daniel.
But the example means the industry is in disarray. The risk management systems did not work. And now the asset management systems aren’t working either. Fixing them will cost money and more losses.
How much is the monthly carrying cost on 1 house? Multiply that by millions and by several months.
November 15, 2007 at 9:13 AM #99838ParticipantGood point, Daniel.
But the example means the industry is in disarray. The risk management systems did not work. And now the asset management systems aren’t working either. Fixing them will cost money and more losses.
How much is the monthly carrying cost on 1 house? Multiply that by millions and by several months.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.