- This topic has 84 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
jztz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:24 PM #9904
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:41 PM #76445
lonestar2000
ParticipantDo what I do, only show your wife properties that have past your screening. Then she decides to buy the property she likes best from the ones you’re comfortable with buying.
Seriously, my wife is as concerned about finances as I am, so I guess I lucked out. We will not buy unless we’re both happy with the property. We certainly have no shortage of choices now and time is on our side. The longer we wait the better off we’ll be so we’re certainly not in a hurry.
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:27 AM #76990
housingfreefall
ParticipantFrankly, this post suprised me not becaue it stereo-typed women, but because some posters are indicating it is their wife’s pursuasion that makes it difficult to stay out of this falling market…..
Guys, a power house women can both sooth a man and support his endeavors, read the WSJ, invests in stocks, earn 6 figures, research up and coming emerging markets and cook, while inspiring and supporting the dreams of her family. If you did not choose this type of women well guys psychology points out it is not the women but instead your own sence of self that causes you to choose a weaker partner..umm food for thought!!!-
August 17, 2007 at 1:19 PM #77104
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantIf this is the only blog you read I understand how you might think this is sexist talk. However at Ben Jones site you cannot ignore the consistent anecdotal stories that come through regarding the theme.
Hell Century 21 capitalized.
One of the most logical “chick” posters (I say chick because it’s her handle) over there at Ben’s site is constantly bashing her own sex because she sees this mentality.
I don’t think anyone is trying to say that “all women” act in this manner.
By the way there are probably just as many simpleton “dudes” who think RE only goes up.
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:26 PM #77165
jztz
ParticipantI love the comments regarding “STJ” and “NFP” wives! Maybe it’s true that more women make decisions based on feelings (relative to men), but that’s what make the world an interesting place.
For someone who asked – this is basically Meyers-Briggs personality typing. It’s not easy to explain it in detail, but I’ll give it a try.
S(sensing) v.s. N (intuitive) — how people processing informations. Sensing people use their senses, and tend to be concrete and focuses on specific. Intuitives are more about ideas, concepts and tend to be abstract and focus on principles. These two types often would have communication problems because literally they’re on different wavelength.
T(Thinking) v.s. F (Feeling) – how people makes decisions. Thinking people are rational and make decisions based on facts and logic; Feeling people make decisions based on, you get it, emotional signals. Thinking people generally are more in engineering, science, business; while Feeling in marketing, psychology, nursing, etc.
P(Perceiving) v.s. J (Judging) – how people deal with time. Perceiving type acts like observers, and they move along time without too much a hurry (they procrastinate and often be late). Judging type likes to bring things to conclusions and more likely to be goal oriented.
Another dimension is I (Introvert) v.s. E (Extrovert) – where people tend to get energy. Introvert brings the world into their head to process, and tend to get exhausted after socialzing; extravert embrace the world, and get energized from being with other people.
With these 4 characteristics, there are 16 combinations. It’s fasicinating stuff. I re-read my M-B stuff several years back, and you really can see how a person functions if you observe well.
And, yes, I believe that more women are feeling type than thinking type. To me, it’s a good thing if you think about it. Wouldn’t be BORING had it been otherwise?
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:26 PM #77286
jztz
ParticipantI love the comments regarding “STJ” and “NFP” wives! Maybe it’s true that more women make decisions based on feelings (relative to men), but that’s what make the world an interesting place.
For someone who asked – this is basically Meyers-Briggs personality typing. It’s not easy to explain it in detail, but I’ll give it a try.
S(sensing) v.s. N (intuitive) — how people processing informations. Sensing people use their senses, and tend to be concrete and focuses on specific. Intuitives are more about ideas, concepts and tend to be abstract and focus on principles. These two types often would have communication problems because literally they’re on different wavelength.
T(Thinking) v.s. F (Feeling) – how people makes decisions. Thinking people are rational and make decisions based on facts and logic; Feeling people make decisions based on, you get it, emotional signals. Thinking people generally are more in engineering, science, business; while Feeling in marketing, psychology, nursing, etc.
P(Perceiving) v.s. J (Judging) – how people deal with time. Perceiving type acts like observers, and they move along time without too much a hurry (they procrastinate and often be late). Judging type likes to bring things to conclusions and more likely to be goal oriented.
Another dimension is I (Introvert) v.s. E (Extrovert) – where people tend to get energy. Introvert brings the world into their head to process, and tend to get exhausted after socialzing; extravert embrace the world, and get energized from being with other people.
With these 4 characteristics, there are 16 combinations. It’s fasicinating stuff. I re-read my M-B stuff several years back, and you really can see how a person functions if you observe well.
And, yes, I believe that more women are feeling type than thinking type. To me, it’s a good thing if you think about it. Wouldn’t be BORING had it been otherwise?
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:26 PM #77311
jztz
ParticipantI love the comments regarding “STJ” and “NFP” wives! Maybe it’s true that more women make decisions based on feelings (relative to men), but that’s what make the world an interesting place.
For someone who asked – this is basically Meyers-Briggs personality typing. It’s not easy to explain it in detail, but I’ll give it a try.
S(sensing) v.s. N (intuitive) — how people processing informations. Sensing people use their senses, and tend to be concrete and focuses on specific. Intuitives are more about ideas, concepts and tend to be abstract and focus on principles. These two types often would have communication problems because literally they’re on different wavelength.
T(Thinking) v.s. F (Feeling) – how people makes decisions. Thinking people are rational and make decisions based on facts and logic; Feeling people make decisions based on, you get it, emotional signals. Thinking people generally are more in engineering, science, business; while Feeling in marketing, psychology, nursing, etc.
P(Perceiving) v.s. J (Judging) – how people deal with time. Perceiving type acts like observers, and they move along time without too much a hurry (they procrastinate and often be late). Judging type likes to bring things to conclusions and more likely to be goal oriented.
Another dimension is I (Introvert) v.s. E (Extrovert) – where people tend to get energy. Introvert brings the world into their head to process, and tend to get exhausted after socialzing; extravert embrace the world, and get energized from being with other people.
With these 4 characteristics, there are 16 combinations. It’s fasicinating stuff. I re-read my M-B stuff several years back, and you really can see how a person functions if you observe well.
And, yes, I believe that more women are feeling type than thinking type. To me, it’s a good thing if you think about it. Wouldn’t be BORING had it been otherwise?
-
August 17, 2007 at 1:19 PM #77226
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantIf this is the only blog you read I understand how you might think this is sexist talk. However at Ben Jones site you cannot ignore the consistent anecdotal stories that come through regarding the theme.
Hell Century 21 capitalized.
One of the most logical “chick” posters (I say chick because it’s her handle) over there at Ben’s site is constantly bashing her own sex because she sees this mentality.
I don’t think anyone is trying to say that “all women” act in this manner.
By the way there are probably just as many simpleton “dudes” who think RE only goes up.
-
August 17, 2007 at 1:19 PM #77251
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantIf this is the only blog you read I understand how you might think this is sexist talk. However at Ben Jones site you cannot ignore the consistent anecdotal stories that come through regarding the theme.
Hell Century 21 capitalized.
One of the most logical “chick” posters (I say chick because it’s her handle) over there at Ben’s site is constantly bashing her own sex because she sees this mentality.
I don’t think anyone is trying to say that “all women” act in this manner.
By the way there are probably just as many simpleton “dudes” who think RE only goes up.
-
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:27 AM #77112
housingfreefall
ParticipantFrankly, this post suprised me not becaue it stereo-typed women, but because some posters are indicating it is their wife’s pursuasion that makes it difficult to stay out of this falling market…..
Guys, a power house women can both sooth a man and support his endeavors, read the WSJ, invests in stocks, earn 6 figures, research up and coming emerging markets and cook, while inspiring and supporting the dreams of her family. If you did not choose this type of women well guys psychology points out it is not the women but instead your own sence of self that causes you to choose a weaker partner..umm food for thought!!! -
August 17, 2007 at 9:27 AM #77138
housingfreefall
ParticipantFrankly, this post suprised me not becaue it stereo-typed women, but because some posters are indicating it is their wife’s pursuasion that makes it difficult to stay out of this falling market…..
Guys, a power house women can both sooth a man and support his endeavors, read the WSJ, invests in stocks, earn 6 figures, research up and coming emerging markets and cook, while inspiring and supporting the dreams of her family. If you did not choose this type of women well guys psychology points out it is not the women but instead your own sence of self that causes you to choose a weaker partner..umm food for thought!!!
-
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:41 PM #76566
lonestar2000
ParticipantDo what I do, only show your wife properties that have past your screening. Then she decides to buy the property she likes best from the ones you’re comfortable with buying.
Seriously, my wife is as concerned about finances as I am, so I guess I lucked out. We will not buy unless we’re both happy with the property. We certainly have no shortage of choices now and time is on our side. The longer we wait the better off we’ll be so we’re certainly not in a hurry.
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:41 PM #76591
lonestar2000
ParticipantDo what I do, only show your wife properties that have past your screening. Then she decides to buy the property she likes best from the ones you’re comfortable with buying.
Seriously, my wife is as concerned about finances as I am, so I guess I lucked out. We will not buy unless we’re both happy with the property. We certainly have no shortage of choices now and time is on our side. The longer we wait the better off we’ll be so we’re certainly not in a hurry.
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:45 PM #76457
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantYes, Perry, in my household universe, Nancy is the guiding ship of all things financial. Good thing I read and contribute to this blog while the mathematical-genius spouse sticks only to software engineering. Our net worth has only expanded so far guided by my trusty crystal ball. Nancy, a petite, Catherine Zeta-Jones Asian look-alike, is no reckless, bling-bling, wussy.
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:53 PM #76460
JES
ParticipantDo a Myers Briggs personality test on your wife. If she comes back an STJ, narrow the choices down before getting her involved. She will want to look at what’s in front of her, be analytical about it and close her options quickly. If she comes back an NFP, let her be the one who hunts and finds all the possibilities. then when it comes time to decide, send her to the kitchen to bake cookies…
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:22 PM #76571
stansd
ParticipantJES,
This is hilarious. As an STJ who is married to an NFP, it gives me much food for thought….only catch, is that she’d get overwhelmed with all the possibilities.
Stan
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:43 PM #76592
JC
ParticipantNormally, the comments on this board are super informative and I feel like I get valuable info here.
The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.
I’ve got to say that I’m a little surprised. I expect better from Piggington’s!
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:02 PM #76600
lniles
ParticipantI’m surprised as well. In my personal experience, the woman I was with did NOT want to buy (it was me who wanted a nest). Stereotypes won’t stick.
I’m sure a lot of marriages will be affected by the coming storm though.
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:19 PM #76609
condogrrl
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 16, 2007 at 7:22 PM #76718
TheBreeze
Participant“Considering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.”
If I’m not mistaken, PC has admitted to a special affection for the brown eye.
-
August 16, 2007 at 7:22 PM #76837
TheBreeze
Participant“Considering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.”
If I’m not mistaken, PC has admitted to a special affection for the brown eye.
-
August 16, 2007 at 7:22 PM #76866
TheBreeze
Participant“Considering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.”
If I’m not mistaken, PC has admitted to a special affection for the brown eye.
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #76984
Fearful
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some women have toward men, I’m surprised that those women are married to men. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #77106
Fearful
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some women have toward men, I’m surprised that those women are married to men. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:19 AM #77132
Fearful
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some women have toward men, I’m surprised that those women are married to men. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:19 PM #76729
condogrrl
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:19 PM #76758
condogrrl
ParticipantConsidering the antagonism some men have toward women, I’m surprised that those men are married to women. It seems like they would be happier as homosexuals, mated with their own kind.
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:23 PM #76615
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantThank you, SDowner.
My spouse appreciates very much that I am very conservative and practical with our finances. Compared to him, I am a cheapskate. I try my best to cook all our delicious meals to avoid eating out, for example. I penny-pinch, period. However, I give way to the joys of HIS life too, like his brand-new 1100-cc Honda Shadow we bought for cash, for him to “save gas” (yeah, right….)
But maybe there is truth that sometimes the wife has more of a need to keep up with the Joneses. There are exceptions like us, of course – (they call us the weirdos, ha-ha.)
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:58 PM #76642
lniles
ParticipantHaha Nancy I have the Shadow 750… also to “save gas”. 🙂
-
August 16, 2007 at 4:50 PM #76672
JPJones
ParticipantPerryChase,
I’m pretty sure (read: Hope to god!) you don’t have kids yet, but are you married? It sure doesn’t sound like it. While there might be cases where the article’s point is valid, to generalize that women have that much control in a successful marriage is way off-base.
JP
-
August 16, 2007 at 5:20 PM #76690
PerryChase
ParticipantAs the regulars here know, I’m a proud card carrying liberal. And I support equal pay for women and other women’s causes.
I didn’t mean to be sexist. But I do think that there’s truth to this. I’ve seen a lot of women influence home purchases. I also see men who are executives but have to check with their wives for everything — like dinner on Friday. Maybe it’s just the people I know.
This is a sensitive issue but I’d be willing to bet that, if asked, Realtors would confirm this in confidence (so as not to offend their biggest customers).
For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s something inherent in the female sex, but it’s how women are socialized.
I think that men were also complicit in creating this bubble because they thought they could do little a sweat equity and become rich. Make the wife happy by giving her the house she wants; a little paint and elbow grease and the family gets to move on and on up the property ladder.
In a declining or stagnant market, my suspicion is that husbands would more likely restain their wives’ nesting urges (or the other way around as some posters wrote).
-
August 16, 2007 at 5:20 PM #76810
PerryChase
ParticipantAs the regulars here know, I’m a proud card carrying liberal. And I support equal pay for women and other women’s causes.
I didn’t mean to be sexist. But I do think that there’s truth to this. I’ve seen a lot of women influence home purchases. I also see men who are executives but have to check with their wives for everything — like dinner on Friday. Maybe it’s just the people I know.
This is a sensitive issue but I’d be willing to bet that, if asked, Realtors would confirm this in confidence (so as not to offend their biggest customers).
For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s something inherent in the female sex, but it’s how women are socialized.
I think that men were also complicit in creating this bubble because they thought they could do little a sweat equity and become rich. Make the wife happy by giving her the house she wants; a little paint and elbow grease and the family gets to move on and on up the property ladder.
In a declining or stagnant market, my suspicion is that husbands would more likely restain their wives’ nesting urges (or the other way around as some posters wrote).
-
August 16, 2007 at 5:20 PM #76839
PerryChase
ParticipantAs the regulars here know, I’m a proud card carrying liberal. And I support equal pay for women and other women’s causes.
I didn’t mean to be sexist. But I do think that there’s truth to this. I’ve seen a lot of women influence home purchases. I also see men who are executives but have to check with their wives for everything — like dinner on Friday. Maybe it’s just the people I know.
This is a sensitive issue but I’d be willing to bet that, if asked, Realtors would confirm this in confidence (so as not to offend their biggest customers).
For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s something inherent in the female sex, but it’s how women are socialized.
I think that men were also complicit in creating this bubble because they thought they could do little a sweat equity and become rich. Make the wife happy by giving her the house she wants; a little paint and elbow grease and the family gets to move on and on up the property ladder.
In a declining or stagnant market, my suspicion is that husbands would more likely restain their wives’ nesting urges (or the other way around as some posters wrote).
-
August 16, 2007 at 4:50 PM #76792
JPJones
ParticipantPerryChase,
I’m pretty sure (read: Hope to god!) you don’t have kids yet, but are you married? It sure doesn’t sound like it. While there might be cases where the article’s point is valid, to generalize that women have that much control in a successful marriage is way off-base.
JP
-
August 16, 2007 at 4:50 PM #76821
JPJones
ParticipantPerryChase,
I’m pretty sure (read: Hope to god!) you don’t have kids yet, but are you married? It sure doesn’t sound like it. While there might be cases where the article’s point is valid, to generalize that women have that much control in a successful marriage is way off-base.
JP
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:58 PM #76762
lniles
ParticipantHaha Nancy I have the Shadow 750… also to “save gas”. 🙂
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:58 PM #76790
lniles
ParticipantHaha Nancy I have the Shadow 750… also to “save gas”. 🙂
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:23 PM #76735
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantThank you, SDowner.
My spouse appreciates very much that I am very conservative and practical with our finances. Compared to him, I am a cheapskate. I try my best to cook all our delicious meals to avoid eating out, for example. I penny-pinch, period. However, I give way to the joys of HIS life too, like his brand-new 1100-cc Honda Shadow we bought for cash, for him to “save gas” (yeah, right….)
But maybe there is truth that sometimes the wife has more of a need to keep up with the Joneses. There are exceptions like us, of course – (they call us the weirdos, ha-ha.)
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:23 PM #76764
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantThank you, SDowner.
My spouse appreciates very much that I am very conservative and practical with our finances. Compared to him, I am a cheapskate. I try my best to cook all our delicious meals to avoid eating out, for example. I penny-pinch, period. However, I give way to the joys of HIS life too, like his brand-new 1100-cc Honda Shadow we bought for cash, for him to “save gas” (yeah, right….)
But maybe there is truth that sometimes the wife has more of a need to keep up with the Joneses. There are exceptions like us, of course – (they call us the weirdos, ha-ha.)
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:02 PM #76721
lniles
ParticipantI’m surprised as well. In my personal experience, the woman I was with did NOT want to buy (it was me who wanted a nest). Stereotypes won’t stick.
I’m sure a lot of marriages will be affected by the coming storm though.
-
August 16, 2007 at 3:02 PM #76749
lniles
ParticipantI’m surprised as well. In my personal experience, the woman I was with did NOT want to buy (it was me who wanted a nest). Stereotypes won’t stick.
I’m sure a lot of marriages will be affected by the coming storm though.
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:30 AM #76954
buyorhold
Participant“The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.”
I totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:14 AM #76978
one_muggle
ParticipantI totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.Don’t get upset sweetie, just calm down and be quiet (tongue-in-cheek AND ducking)
Seriously, this is foolishness. One female colleague of mine has been investing in RE for about 20yrs. She can buy&sell most of us now and only works for fun. Somehow I doubt she was overly emotional during her business dealings. Another (female) relative is on wallstreet and handles bond issues for multi-billion corporate ventures–like starting new semiconductor plants in Vietnam. I do recall her being emotional just after the birth of her first son, and throwing a hysterical fit when we couldn’t locate her husband during 9/11–so I guess that is emotional. But cross her in business and she’ll set your stones in a vice. I won’t even play Monopoly with her. ;^)
-one muggle
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:14 AM #77100
one_muggle
ParticipantI totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.Don’t get upset sweetie, just calm down and be quiet (tongue-in-cheek AND ducking)
Seriously, this is foolishness. One female colleague of mine has been investing in RE for about 20yrs. She can buy&sell most of us now and only works for fun. Somehow I doubt she was overly emotional during her business dealings. Another (female) relative is on wallstreet and handles bond issues for multi-billion corporate ventures–like starting new semiconductor plants in Vietnam. I do recall her being emotional just after the birth of her first son, and throwing a hysterical fit when we couldn’t locate her husband during 9/11–so I guess that is emotional. But cross her in business and she’ll set your stones in a vice. I won’t even play Monopoly with her. ;^)
-one muggle
-
August 17, 2007 at 9:14 AM #77126
one_muggle
ParticipantI totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.Don’t get upset sweetie, just calm down and be quiet (tongue-in-cheek AND ducking)
Seriously, this is foolishness. One female colleague of mine has been investing in RE for about 20yrs. She can buy&sell most of us now and only works for fun. Somehow I doubt she was overly emotional during her business dealings. Another (female) relative is on wallstreet and handles bond issues for multi-billion corporate ventures–like starting new semiconductor plants in Vietnam. I do recall her being emotional just after the birth of her first son, and throwing a hysterical fit when we couldn’t locate her husband during 9/11–so I guess that is emotional. But cross her in business and she’ll set your stones in a vice. I won’t even play Monopoly with her. ;^)
-one muggle
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:30 AM #77076
buyorhold
Participant“The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.”
I totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:30 AM #77102
buyorhold
Participant“The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.”
I totally agree, this type of comment is extremely sexist and embarassing to Piggington’s.
I, the wife, am the one that has been ultra-conservation about buying in the current market.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:43 PM #76713
JC
ParticipantNormally, the comments on this board are super informative and I feel like I get valuable info here.
The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.
I’ve got to say that I’m a little surprised. I expect better from Piggington’s!
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:43 PM #76740
JC
ParticipantNormally, the comments on this board are super informative and I feel like I get valuable info here.
The LA Times article was interesting and somewhat informative. However, the initial assessment of the article was trite and sexist.
I’ve got to say that I’m a little surprised. I expect better from Piggington’s!
-
August 17, 2007 at 12:07 AM #76809
citydweller
ParticipantPardon my ignorance, but what do STJ and NFP stand for?
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:10 AM #76818
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantPerry and I probably could not be more different politically speaking, but he is correct, and this is not some wild stretch.
Anyone who has followed Ben’s blog with any regularity knows that what Perry posted is an ongoing theme over there. Anecdotal story after anecdotal story, about big dumb lug, who can’t say no the wife. In my 16 years of marriage (started at 22), my wife wins most every battle, because, frankly, I just don’t care about that much.
However I had to basically tell her a few times to “sit down and shut up” as regards her nesting instinct. (We moved here two years ago).
Now when I say “sit down and shut up” I don’t mean it literally, as she’d probably kick my ass. (she does crossfit with some navy seal dude). What I meant was a continual education process about just how stupid a mistake it would be to purchase, and eventually she trusted my stubborness.
She also sees the emotional side of a home more than I though many on this site do not fit that stereotype. We had to eat about 9K when I sold my house in Ohio (Nov. 2005) and at closing I had to sell some stock to pay the note. I was hoping to hold onto that stock for the long term but it was the only non retirement account investment that I had.
I hurt her feelings by saying something along the lines of “buying that house was the absolute stupidest thing I have ever done”. Of course I loved that house too, but I was just bitter about losing my only real asset. She saw it as her dream home (still pissed at me for moving us out here), where the kids had so many great memories, and in the case of our youngest it’s the only other home he remembers outside of the crapbox we rent now.
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:10 AM #76938
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantPerry and I probably could not be more different politically speaking, but he is correct, and this is not some wild stretch.
Anyone who has followed Ben’s blog with any regularity knows that what Perry posted is an ongoing theme over there. Anecdotal story after anecdotal story, about big dumb lug, who can’t say no the wife. In my 16 years of marriage (started at 22), my wife wins most every battle, because, frankly, I just don’t care about that much.
However I had to basically tell her a few times to “sit down and shut up” as regards her nesting instinct. (We moved here two years ago).
Now when I say “sit down and shut up” I don’t mean it literally, as she’d probably kick my ass. (she does crossfit with some navy seal dude). What I meant was a continual education process about just how stupid a mistake it would be to purchase, and eventually she trusted my stubborness.
She also sees the emotional side of a home more than I though many on this site do not fit that stereotype. We had to eat about 9K when I sold my house in Ohio (Nov. 2005) and at closing I had to sell some stock to pay the note. I was hoping to hold onto that stock for the long term but it was the only non retirement account investment that I had.
I hurt her feelings by saying something along the lines of “buying that house was the absolute stupidest thing I have ever done”. Of course I loved that house too, but I was just bitter about losing my only real asset. She saw it as her dream home (still pissed at me for moving us out here), where the kids had so many great memories, and in the case of our youngest it’s the only other home he remembers outside of the crapbox we rent now.
-
August 17, 2007 at 2:10 AM #76964
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantPerry and I probably could not be more different politically speaking, but he is correct, and this is not some wild stretch.
Anyone who has followed Ben’s blog with any regularity knows that what Perry posted is an ongoing theme over there. Anecdotal story after anecdotal story, about big dumb lug, who can’t say no the wife. In my 16 years of marriage (started at 22), my wife wins most every battle, because, frankly, I just don’t care about that much.
However I had to basically tell her a few times to “sit down and shut up” as regards her nesting instinct. (We moved here two years ago).
Now when I say “sit down and shut up” I don’t mean it literally, as she’d probably kick my ass. (she does crossfit with some navy seal dude). What I meant was a continual education process about just how stupid a mistake it would be to purchase, and eventually she trusted my stubborness.
She also sees the emotional side of a home more than I though many on this site do not fit that stereotype. We had to eat about 9K when I sold my house in Ohio (Nov. 2005) and at closing I had to sell some stock to pay the note. I was hoping to hold onto that stock for the long term but it was the only non retirement account investment that I had.
I hurt her feelings by saying something along the lines of “buying that house was the absolute stupidest thing I have ever done”. Of course I loved that house too, but I was just bitter about losing my only real asset. She saw it as her dream home (still pissed at me for moving us out here), where the kids had so many great memories, and in the case of our youngest it’s the only other home he remembers outside of the crapbox we rent now.
-
August 17, 2007 at 12:07 AM #76929
citydweller
ParticipantPardon my ignorance, but what do STJ and NFP stand for?
-
August 17, 2007 at 12:07 AM #76955
citydweller
ParticipantPardon my ignorance, but what do STJ and NFP stand for?
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:22 PM #76692
stansd
ParticipantJES,
This is hilarious. As an STJ who is married to an NFP, it gives me much food for thought….only catch, is that she’d get overwhelmed with all the possibilities.
Stan
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:22 PM #76719
stansd
ParticipantJES,
This is hilarious. As an STJ who is married to an NFP, it gives me much food for thought….only catch, is that she’d get overwhelmed with all the possibilities.
Stan
-
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:53 PM #76581
JES
ParticipantDo a Myers Briggs personality test on your wife. If she comes back an STJ, narrow the choices down before getting her involved. She will want to look at what’s in front of her, be analytical about it and close her options quickly. If she comes back an NFP, let her be the one who hunts and finds all the possibilities. then when it comes time to decide, send her to the kitchen to bake cookies…
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:53 PM #76607
JES
ParticipantDo a Myers Briggs personality test on your wife. If she comes back an STJ, narrow the choices down before getting her involved. She will want to look at what’s in front of her, be analytical about it and close her options quickly. If she comes back an NFP, let her be the one who hunts and finds all the possibilities. then when it comes time to decide, send her to the kitchen to bake cookies…
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:01 PM #76472
kagster
ParticipantThe reason i let my wife make the all decision is because I don’t like arguing with her. Here is your budget and stick to it. And yet, she comes back and asks “Sweety, what do you think of this?” or tries to drag me along shopping with her.
When we first bought our first home, i wanted to divorce her because we argued about every little thing. It gets tiring after a while. I’m practical and she’s material. I like modern and she likes antique, especially “cherry” color. On and On.
If you’re not married yet make sure you ask your other half to be about buying a house and what to furnish with it. It will save you a lot of headaches.
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:20 PM #76493
Critter
ParticipantBlame your lender, blame your agent for encouraging you to buy “as much house as you can afford,” blame your boss for not giving you a raise, and when all else fails… blame your wife for her “nesting urges” leading you to bankruptcy.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:18 PM #76565
Wickedheart
ParticipantYou’re a pretty smart critter. My husband who I can assure you does exactly as he wishes loves to tell people he did or didn’t do something because of the big, bad wifey. I don’t mind it at all because I can play that game too.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:18 PM #76686
Wickedheart
ParticipantYou’re a pretty smart critter. My husband who I can assure you does exactly as he wishes loves to tell people he did or didn’t do something because of the big, bad wifey. I don’t mind it at all because I can play that game too.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:18 PM #76712
Wickedheart
ParticipantYou’re a pretty smart critter. My husband who I can assure you does exactly as he wishes loves to tell people he did or didn’t do something because of the big, bad wifey. I don’t mind it at all because I can play that game too.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:21 PM #76568
SDowner
ParticipantAgree with Nancy Soothsayer, totally.
Priorities in life are determined by circumstances, education, and environment, not by sex. I am a woman, but my husband is more attached to our hosue than I am. Everyone has some % of emotion and practicality when buying a house.
SDowner
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:21 PM #76689
SDowner
ParticipantAgree with Nancy Soothsayer, totally.
Priorities in life are determined by circumstances, education, and environment, not by sex. I am a woman, but my husband is more attached to our hosue than I am. Everyone has some % of emotion and practicality when buying a house.
SDowner
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:21 PM #76716
SDowner
ParticipantAgree with Nancy Soothsayer, totally.
Priorities in life are determined by circumstances, education, and environment, not by sex. I am a woman, but my husband is more attached to our hosue than I am. Everyone has some % of emotion and practicality when buying a house.
SDowner
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:20 PM #76614
Critter
ParticipantBlame your lender, blame your agent for encouraging you to buy “as much house as you can afford,” blame your boss for not giving you a raise, and when all else fails… blame your wife for her “nesting urges” leading you to bankruptcy.
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:20 PM #76640
Critter
ParticipantBlame your lender, blame your agent for encouraging you to buy “as much house as you can afford,” blame your boss for not giving you a raise, and when all else fails… blame your wife for her “nesting urges” leading you to bankruptcy.
-
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:01 PM #76593
kagster
ParticipantThe reason i let my wife make the all decision is because I don’t like arguing with her. Here is your budget and stick to it. And yet, she comes back and asks “Sweety, what do you think of this?” or tries to drag me along shopping with her.
When we first bought our first home, i wanted to divorce her because we argued about every little thing. It gets tiring after a while. I’m practical and she’s material. I like modern and she likes antique, especially “cherry” color. On and On.
If you’re not married yet make sure you ask your other half to be about buying a house and what to furnish with it. It will save you a lot of headaches.
-
August 16, 2007 at 1:01 PM #76619
kagster
ParticipantThe reason i let my wife make the all decision is because I don’t like arguing with her. Here is your budget and stick to it. And yet, she comes back and asks “Sweety, what do you think of this?” or tries to drag me along shopping with her.
When we first bought our first home, i wanted to divorce her because we argued about every little thing. It gets tiring after a while. I’m practical and she’s material. I like modern and she likes antique, especially “cherry” color. On and On.
If you’re not married yet make sure you ask your other half to be about buying a house and what to furnish with it. It will save you a lot of headaches.
-
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:45 PM #76578
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantYes, Perry, in my household universe, Nancy is the guiding ship of all things financial. Good thing I read and contribute to this blog while the mathematical-genius spouse sticks only to software engineering. Our net worth has only expanded so far guided by my trusty crystal ball. Nancy, a petite, Catherine Zeta-Jones Asian look-alike, is no reckless, bling-bling, wussy.
-
August 16, 2007 at 12:45 PM #76604
Nancy_s soothsayer
ParticipantYes, Perry, in my household universe, Nancy is the guiding ship of all things financial. Good thing I read and contribute to this blog while the mathematical-genius spouse sticks only to software engineering. Our net worth has only expanded so far guided by my trusty crystal ball. Nancy, a petite, Catherine Zeta-Jones Asian look-alike, is no reckless, bling-bling, wussy.
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:15 PM #76559
Enorah
ParticipantI can not believe people are still saying sexist and polarizing crap like that and then putting it in print, with their names on it.
Well she is a woman after all. Her heart said, “Go on publish this dribble” while her head was obviously getting her nails done.
:SCREAM:
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:15 PM #76679
Enorah
ParticipantI can not believe people are still saying sexist and polarizing crap like that and then putting it in print, with their names on it.
Well she is a woman after all. Her heart said, “Go on publish this dribble” while her head was obviously getting her nails done.
:SCREAM:
-
August 16, 2007 at 2:15 PM #76707
Enorah
ParticipantI can not believe people are still saying sexist and polarizing crap like that and then putting it in print, with their names on it.
Well she is a woman after all. Her heart said, “Go on publish this dribble” while her head was obviously getting her nails done.
:SCREAM:
-
August 16, 2007 at 6:34 PM #76708
ucodegen
Participant“It’s an old stereotype but true,” said Richard Peterson, a psychiatrist who specializes in investment psychology. “Women access their emotional center,” tapping into how they feel about a purchase. Men typically don’t. Turns out, he added, those emotions lead to better decision-making.
When enough people do the same thing, it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy… until the market behavior shifts. This is why “technical analysis” works for quite a while until it doesn’t, at which time it fails spectacularly. Witness also all the ‘models’ that companies were using for investment in CDOs and MBS(s).
-
August 16, 2007 at 6:34 PM #76828
ucodegen
Participant“It’s an old stereotype but true,” said Richard Peterson, a psychiatrist who specializes in investment psychology. “Women access their emotional center,” tapping into how they feel about a purchase. Men typically don’t. Turns out, he added, those emotions lead to better decision-making.
When enough people do the same thing, it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy… until the market behavior shifts. This is why “technical analysis” works for quite a while until it doesn’t, at which time it fails spectacularly. Witness also all the ‘models’ that companies were using for investment in CDOs and MBS(s).
-
August 16, 2007 at 6:34 PM #76857
ucodegen
Participant“It’s an old stereotype but true,” said Richard Peterson, a psychiatrist who specializes in investment psychology. “Women access their emotional center,” tapping into how they feel about a purchase. Men typically don’t. Turns out, he added, those emotions lead to better decision-making.
When enough people do the same thing, it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy… until the market behavior shifts. This is why “technical analysis” works for quite a while until it doesn’t, at which time it fails spectacularly. Witness also all the ‘models’ that companies were using for investment in CDOs and MBS(s).
-
August 17, 2007 at 7:43 AM #76915
OC Burns
ParticipantDoesn’t this mean that women are responsible for the housing crisis? If they had only let the men make all the decisions, none of this would have happened.
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:29 AM #76951
kiki
ParticipantOC Burns, for it to be true (if women are responsible) the mayority of sales should be people buying homes to live in, but isn’t this bubble built on pure speculation and flipping mania. Can you prove that mayority of flippers are women?
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:29 AM #77073
kiki
ParticipantOC Burns, for it to be true (if women are responsible) the mayority of sales should be people buying homes to live in, but isn’t this bubble built on pure speculation and flipping mania. Can you prove that mayority of flippers are women?
-
August 17, 2007 at 8:29 AM #77099
kiki
ParticipantOC Burns, for it to be true (if women are responsible) the mayority of sales should be people buying homes to live in, but isn’t this bubble built on pure speculation and flipping mania. Can you prove that mayority of flippers are women?
-
-
August 17, 2007 at 7:43 AM #77037
OC Burns
ParticipantDoesn’t this mean that women are responsible for the housing crisis? If they had only let the men make all the decisions, none of this would have happened.
-
August 17, 2007 at 7:43 AM #77063
OC Burns
ParticipantDoesn’t this mean that women are responsible for the housing crisis? If they had only let the men make all the decisions, none of this would have happened.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.