- This topic has 60 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 22, 2008 at 5:22 PM #13649August 22, 2008 at 10:11 PM #260336sdrealtorParticipant
I was there today. Looking at the listing history, it was a short sale that was not a successful one. It went back to the bank on July 31st and is now bank owned. It was listed today as an REO brown lawn special. Any other questions?
August 22, 2008 at 10:11 PM #260535sdrealtorParticipantI was there today. Looking at the listing history, it was a short sale that was not a successful one. It went back to the bank on July 31st and is now bank owned. It was listed today as an REO brown lawn special. Any other questions?
August 22, 2008 at 10:11 PM #260544sdrealtorParticipantI was there today. Looking at the listing history, it was a short sale that was not a successful one. It went back to the bank on July 31st and is now bank owned. It was listed today as an REO brown lawn special. Any other questions?
August 22, 2008 at 10:11 PM #260593sdrealtorParticipantI was there today. Looking at the listing history, it was a short sale that was not a successful one. It went back to the bank on July 31st and is now bank owned. It was listed today as an REO brown lawn special. Any other questions?
August 22, 2008 at 10:11 PM #260632sdrealtorParticipantI was there today. Looking at the listing history, it was a short sale that was not a successful one. It went back to the bank on July 31st and is now bank owned. It was listed today as an REO brown lawn special. Any other questions?
August 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM #260346CA renterParticipantThat makes sense. Thanks, sdrealtor!
We looked at it the last time it was for sale, and it looked like it needed quite a bit of work.
August 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM #260545CA renterParticipantThat makes sense. Thanks, sdrealtor!
We looked at it the last time it was for sale, and it looked like it needed quite a bit of work.
August 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM #260554CA renterParticipantThat makes sense. Thanks, sdrealtor!
We looked at it the last time it was for sale, and it looked like it needed quite a bit of work.
August 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM #260603CA renterParticipantThat makes sense. Thanks, sdrealtor!
We looked at it the last time it was for sale, and it looked like it needed quite a bit of work.
August 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM #260643CA renterParticipantThat makes sense. Thanks, sdrealtor!
We looked at it the last time it was for sale, and it looked like it needed quite a bit of work.
August 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM #260351sdrealtorParticipantAt 525 it’s not a deal. At 475 it aint looking so bad.
August 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM #260550sdrealtorParticipantAt 525 it’s not a deal. At 475 it aint looking so bad.
August 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM #260559sdrealtorParticipantAt 525 it’s not a deal. At 475 it aint looking so bad.
August 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM #260607sdrealtorParticipantAt 525 it’s not a deal. At 475 it aint looking so bad.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.