- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 2 months ago by powayseller.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2006 at 7:49 PM #7209August 15, 2006 at 8:05 PM #31995barnaby33Participant
Don’t get your knickers in a bind just yet. Wal-mart’s negative earnings stem mostly from a 1 billion dollar write-off to get out of Germany.
Josh
August 15, 2006 at 9:04 PM #31997powaysellerParticipantwaiting hawk, you’ve gotta loosen up. Meet me at Fashion Valley sometime, and I will show you how to shop!
August 16, 2006 at 7:47 AM #32013JESParticipantAnd Wal-Mart sales were actually up…
August 16, 2006 at 8:50 AM #32017barnaby33ParticipantI hate it when I catch myself being lazy. The write off stems from a 1 billion dollar charge to stop doing business in Germany and close its stores. Getting out of Germany usually isn’t that expensive.
Josh
August 16, 2006 at 9:21 AM #32021powaysellerParticipantI read in the paper today that Walmart’s president blamed lower sales on higher gas prices.
In the paper also: Home Depot’s earnings were up 5%, and the company said they would return to reporting same-store sales. The story did NOT mention revenue increases, so I am concluding that the earnings increase was due to some accounting gimmick or land sales, but it is NOT related to increasing sales, that’s for sure.
Also, did everyone catch Barry Ritholtz’s analysis of what is hidden in the lower PPI? PPI dropped because of heavy discounting by the auto makers. It made up for the 40% rise in material input costs. 40% rise in quarterly material input costs! Is that inflationary or what?
This just goes to show: you can’t let yourself be fooled by a headline. Always dig inside the story. Whether it’s median, CPI, PPI, earnings increases: the number often hides an opposite reality.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.