- This topic has 135 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
bluefins.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 5:58 AM #11248
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:51 AM #119484
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefins,
I live in Murrieta in a home purchased in 2003. We have a very small mortgage and will be riding the bubble and burst cycle all the way through.
So, here is the test: do you want to live in the house for ten years? Is it truly the right house for your family?
If you say “yes” to both of those, then I say OK, go through with it.
Keep in mind, NOBODY knows what is next in the real estate market.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:51 AM #119618
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefins,
I live in Murrieta in a home purchased in 2003. We have a very small mortgage and will be riding the bubble and burst cycle all the way through.
So, here is the test: do you want to live in the house for ten years? Is it truly the right house for your family?
If you say “yes” to both of those, then I say OK, go through with it.
Keep in mind, NOBODY knows what is next in the real estate market.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:51 AM #119650
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefins,
I live in Murrieta in a home purchased in 2003. We have a very small mortgage and will be riding the bubble and burst cycle all the way through.
So, here is the test: do you want to live in the house for ten years? Is it truly the right house for your family?
If you say “yes” to both of those, then I say OK, go through with it.
Keep in mind, NOBODY knows what is next in the real estate market.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:51 AM #119696
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefins,
I live in Murrieta in a home purchased in 2003. We have a very small mortgage and will be riding the bubble and burst cycle all the way through.
So, here is the test: do you want to live in the house for ten years? Is it truly the right house for your family?
If you say “yes” to both of those, then I say OK, go through with it.
Keep in mind, NOBODY knows what is next in the real estate market.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:51 AM #119715
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefins,
I live in Murrieta in a home purchased in 2003. We have a very small mortgage and will be riding the bubble and burst cycle all the way through.
So, here is the test: do you want to live in the house for ten years? Is it truly the right house for your family?
If you say “yes” to both of those, then I say OK, go through with it.
Keep in mind, NOBODY knows what is next in the real estate market.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 AM #119493
Coronita
ParticipantI'd add to consider your households income stability as well. Are you folks working in a profession that isn't remotely connected to RE ? You don't want to be caught with your pants down, even though you can afford the payments now.
Just for fun, would you consider backing out and re-offering at $400k. I wonder want would happen.
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 AM #119628
Coronita
ParticipantI'd add to consider your households income stability as well. Are you folks working in a profession that isn't remotely connected to RE ? You don't want to be caught with your pants down, even though you can afford the payments now.
Just for fun, would you consider backing out and re-offering at $400k. I wonder want would happen.
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 AM #119660
Coronita
ParticipantI'd add to consider your households income stability as well. Are you folks working in a profession that isn't remotely connected to RE ? You don't want to be caught with your pants down, even though you can afford the payments now.
Just for fun, would you consider backing out and re-offering at $400k. I wonder want would happen.
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 AM #119705
Coronita
ParticipantI'd add to consider your households income stability as well. Are you folks working in a profession that isn't remotely connected to RE ? You don't want to be caught with your pants down, even though you can afford the payments now.
Just for fun, would you consider backing out and re-offering at $400k. I wonder want would happen.
-
December 18, 2007 at 6:57 AM #119725
Coronita
ParticipantI'd add to consider your households income stability as well. Are you folks working in a profession that isn't remotely connected to RE ? You don't want to be caught with your pants down, even though you can afford the payments now.
Just for fun, would you consider backing out and re-offering at $400k. I wonder want would happen.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:36 AM #119489
j
ParticipantIf the $3000 is the total looks like it is about the same to buy as rent after taxes. But with 10,000 foreclosures a month in the Inland Empire prices will go down.
Make sure you are getting a good loan. Do not trust the broker; take your loan papers to your CPA. Look at all the fools that did not; it is worth a $100.
Plus, you will be stuck; it takes 6 to 18 months to sell.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:11 AM #119508
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
I’m in the mortgage biz in Murrieta and can give you the truth about your financing possibilities.
Anybody can say that, I’ll prove it to you.You didn’t say exactly how much you have to put down.
Did you ask for any seller contribution to your closing costs ?If it’s your dream home, it is already a whole lot less than you would have paid several years ago.
It is probably going to drop in value more, but monthly rents may not drop. It’s still going to cost you to live somehwere every month.If you are willing to look at a non-recourse purchase loan for what it is, then you will just be renting from the lender for awhile, with a slight possibility of appreciation, maybe, someday.
Without knowing what you qualify for, it’s impossible to quote a rate or payment.
With 10% down, If you are looking at a fully amortized payment, fixed for 30 years, with MI, at the PAR rate, your net housing expense (PITI) per month will be over $3000 per month EVEN IF your situation/credit score/income is perfect.
With 20% down, a $360K loan at par TODAY would have payments of $2154 PI. + TI
No matter what you decide to do in CA, buying rental property for CASH is not a wise thing to do.
There are other creative ways to look at your situation.
J, Your comments are simply foolish.
I’ve had the same accountant who I respect and have used for over 25 years, and he doesn’t understand the first thing about originating a loan, nor does he want to review loan docs. That’s not his concern.
AND
A home can be sold on the first day listed if it is priced right.J, Your generalizations are ridiculous.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:25 AM #119518
hipmatt
Participant450k seems a bit high. I see McMansions all day long in Murrieat for 350k…
I was also wondering what you are putting down, and your professions as well if you don’t mind sharing?
People can say this and that about predicting where home prices are going and when they are bottoming, and some of it is true.
But if you take a look at the UBER inventory levels of the IE, the fact that many in this are had RE related jobs and are now hurting, high gas prices affecting the few who do make big $$(commuting to SD/LA, etc, and that credit markets are tight and most likely will be for a while. Things don’t look too rosy for the IE at all. I will boldly go on record (as unpopular as it has become here at piggington)to say that prices there are going much lower.You can keep renting and buy some local muni bonds that pay a tax free over 5%.
Good luck with your decision.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:46 AM #119544
Anonymous
GuestConsider:
1) If you can continue to rent a similar house for $1,000/month less – well, there’s your answer.
2) Is your emotional attachment to this house (having previously selected it, put in the options etc.) playing a role in this decision?
3) Do you have a desire to ‘recover from past bad decisions’ that is driving this decision to buy?
4) Look to the current market weakness, not the price spread between what the home used to sell for and what it now sells for as your guide. EG: Just because it is now 200k less does not mean it is a good deal.
5) Do you have a false sense of ‘this was meant to be’ going on here? Coincidence of the same house you almost bought being up for sale again etc.Just some thoughts, and emotional issues not normally discussed…
-
December 18, 2007 at 9:22 AM #119574
RatherOpinionated
ParticipantJuice, those are great! I comment you on bringing up some really valid questions on the emotional side of the decision.
Good job!
Now, what is the poster to do if his answers to numbers 2, 3, and 5 are YES. Should that prevent him from buying?
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500] -
December 18, 2007 at 9:22 AM #119709
RatherOpinionated
ParticipantJuice, those are great! I comment you on bringing up some really valid questions on the emotional side of the decision.
Good job!
Now, what is the poster to do if his answers to numbers 2, 3, and 5 are YES. Should that prevent him from buying?
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500] -
December 18, 2007 at 9:22 AM #119742
RatherOpinionated
ParticipantJuice, those are great! I comment you on bringing up some really valid questions on the emotional side of the decision.
Good job!
Now, what is the poster to do if his answers to numbers 2, 3, and 5 are YES. Should that prevent him from buying?
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500] -
December 18, 2007 at 9:22 AM #119787
RatherOpinionated
ParticipantJuice, those are great! I comment you on bringing up some really valid questions on the emotional side of the decision.
Good job!
Now, what is the poster to do if his answers to numbers 2, 3, and 5 are YES. Should that prevent him from buying?
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500] -
December 18, 2007 at 9:22 AM #119806
RatherOpinionated
ParticipantJuice, those are great! I comment you on bringing up some really valid questions on the emotional side of the decision.
Good job!
Now, what is the poster to do if his answers to numbers 2, 3, and 5 are YES. Should that prevent him from buying?
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500] -
December 18, 2007 at 8:46 AM #119678
Anonymous
GuestConsider:
1) If you can continue to rent a similar house for $1,000/month less – well, there’s your answer.
2) Is your emotional attachment to this house (having previously selected it, put in the options etc.) playing a role in this decision?
3) Do you have a desire to ‘recover from past bad decisions’ that is driving this decision to buy?
4) Look to the current market weakness, not the price spread between what the home used to sell for and what it now sells for as your guide. EG: Just because it is now 200k less does not mean it is a good deal.
5) Do you have a false sense of ‘this was meant to be’ going on here? Coincidence of the same house you almost bought being up for sale again etc.Just some thoughts, and emotional issues not normally discussed…
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:46 AM #119711
Anonymous
GuestConsider:
1) If you can continue to rent a similar house for $1,000/month less – well, there’s your answer.
2) Is your emotional attachment to this house (having previously selected it, put in the options etc.) playing a role in this decision?
3) Do you have a desire to ‘recover from past bad decisions’ that is driving this decision to buy?
4) Look to the current market weakness, not the price spread between what the home used to sell for and what it now sells for as your guide. EG: Just because it is now 200k less does not mean it is a good deal.
5) Do you have a false sense of ‘this was meant to be’ going on here? Coincidence of the same house you almost bought being up for sale again etc.Just some thoughts, and emotional issues not normally discussed…
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:46 AM #119756
Anonymous
GuestConsider:
1) If you can continue to rent a similar house for $1,000/month less – well, there’s your answer.
2) Is your emotional attachment to this house (having previously selected it, put in the options etc.) playing a role in this decision?
3) Do you have a desire to ‘recover from past bad decisions’ that is driving this decision to buy?
4) Look to the current market weakness, not the price spread between what the home used to sell for and what it now sells for as your guide. EG: Just because it is now 200k less does not mean it is a good deal.
5) Do you have a false sense of ‘this was meant to be’ going on here? Coincidence of the same house you almost bought being up for sale again etc.Just some thoughts, and emotional issues not normally discussed…
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:46 AM #119777
Anonymous
GuestConsider:
1) If you can continue to rent a similar house for $1,000/month less – well, there’s your answer.
2) Is your emotional attachment to this house (having previously selected it, put in the options etc.) playing a role in this decision?
3) Do you have a desire to ‘recover from past bad decisions’ that is driving this decision to buy?
4) Look to the current market weakness, not the price spread between what the home used to sell for and what it now sells for as your guide. EG: Just because it is now 200k less does not mean it is a good deal.
5) Do you have a false sense of ‘this was meant to be’ going on here? Coincidence of the same house you almost bought being up for sale again etc.Just some thoughts, and emotional issues not normally discussed…
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:25 AM #119653
hipmatt
Participant450k seems a bit high. I see McMansions all day long in Murrieat for 350k…
I was also wondering what you are putting down, and your professions as well if you don’t mind sharing?
People can say this and that about predicting where home prices are going and when they are bottoming, and some of it is true.
But if you take a look at the UBER inventory levels of the IE, the fact that many in this are had RE related jobs and are now hurting, high gas prices affecting the few who do make big $$(commuting to SD/LA, etc, and that credit markets are tight and most likely will be for a while. Things don’t look too rosy for the IE at all. I will boldly go on record (as unpopular as it has become here at piggington)to say that prices there are going much lower.You can keep renting and buy some local muni bonds that pay a tax free over 5%.
Good luck with your decision.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:25 AM #119687
hipmatt
Participant450k seems a bit high. I see McMansions all day long in Murrieat for 350k…
I was also wondering what you are putting down, and your professions as well if you don’t mind sharing?
People can say this and that about predicting where home prices are going and when they are bottoming, and some of it is true.
But if you take a look at the UBER inventory levels of the IE, the fact that many in this are had RE related jobs and are now hurting, high gas prices affecting the few who do make big $$(commuting to SD/LA, etc, and that credit markets are tight and most likely will be for a while. Things don’t look too rosy for the IE at all. I will boldly go on record (as unpopular as it has become here at piggington)to say that prices there are going much lower.You can keep renting and buy some local muni bonds that pay a tax free over 5%.
Good luck with your decision.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:25 AM #119732
hipmatt
Participant450k seems a bit high. I see McMansions all day long in Murrieat for 350k…
I was also wondering what you are putting down, and your professions as well if you don’t mind sharing?
People can say this and that about predicting where home prices are going and when they are bottoming, and some of it is true.
But if you take a look at the UBER inventory levels of the IE, the fact that many in this are had RE related jobs and are now hurting, high gas prices affecting the few who do make big $$(commuting to SD/LA, etc, and that credit markets are tight and most likely will be for a while. Things don’t look too rosy for the IE at all. I will boldly go on record (as unpopular as it has become here at piggington)to say that prices there are going much lower.You can keep renting and buy some local muni bonds that pay a tax free over 5%.
Good luck with your decision.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:25 AM #119750
hipmatt
Participant450k seems a bit high. I see McMansions all day long in Murrieat for 350k…
I was also wondering what you are putting down, and your professions as well if you don’t mind sharing?
People can say this and that about predicting where home prices are going and when they are bottoming, and some of it is true.
But if you take a look at the UBER inventory levels of the IE, the fact that many in this are had RE related jobs and are now hurting, high gas prices affecting the few who do make big $$(commuting to SD/LA, etc, and that credit markets are tight and most likely will be for a while. Things don’t look too rosy for the IE at all. I will boldly go on record (as unpopular as it has become here at piggington)to say that prices there are going much lower.You can keep renting and buy some local muni bonds that pay a tax free over 5%.
Good luck with your decision.
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:11 AM #119643
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
I’m in the mortgage biz in Murrieta and can give you the truth about your financing possibilities.
Anybody can say that, I’ll prove it to you.You didn’t say exactly how much you have to put down.
Did you ask for any seller contribution to your closing costs ?If it’s your dream home, it is already a whole lot less than you would have paid several years ago.
It is probably going to drop in value more, but monthly rents may not drop. It’s still going to cost you to live somehwere every month.If you are willing to look at a non-recourse purchase loan for what it is, then you will just be renting from the lender for awhile, with a slight possibility of appreciation, maybe, someday.
Without knowing what you qualify for, it’s impossible to quote a rate or payment.
With 10% down, If you are looking at a fully amortized payment, fixed for 30 years, with MI, at the PAR rate, your net housing expense (PITI) per month will be over $3000 per month EVEN IF your situation/credit score/income is perfect.
With 20% down, a $360K loan at par TODAY would have payments of $2154 PI. + TI
No matter what you decide to do in CA, buying rental property for CASH is not a wise thing to do.
There are other creative ways to look at your situation.
J, Your comments are simply foolish.
I’ve had the same accountant who I respect and have used for over 25 years, and he doesn’t understand the first thing about originating a loan, nor does he want to review loan docs. That’s not his concern.
AND
A home can be sold on the first day listed if it is priced right.J, Your generalizations are ridiculous.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:11 AM #119676
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
I’m in the mortgage biz in Murrieta and can give you the truth about your financing possibilities.
Anybody can say that, I’ll prove it to you.You didn’t say exactly how much you have to put down.
Did you ask for any seller contribution to your closing costs ?If it’s your dream home, it is already a whole lot less than you would have paid several years ago.
It is probably going to drop in value more, but monthly rents may not drop. It’s still going to cost you to live somehwere every month.If you are willing to look at a non-recourse purchase loan for what it is, then you will just be renting from the lender for awhile, with a slight possibility of appreciation, maybe, someday.
Without knowing what you qualify for, it’s impossible to quote a rate or payment.
With 10% down, If you are looking at a fully amortized payment, fixed for 30 years, with MI, at the PAR rate, your net housing expense (PITI) per month will be over $3000 per month EVEN IF your situation/credit score/income is perfect.
With 20% down, a $360K loan at par TODAY would have payments of $2154 PI. + TI
No matter what you decide to do in CA, buying rental property for CASH is not a wise thing to do.
There are other creative ways to look at your situation.
J, Your comments are simply foolish.
I’ve had the same accountant who I respect and have used for over 25 years, and he doesn’t understand the first thing about originating a loan, nor does he want to review loan docs. That’s not his concern.
AND
A home can be sold on the first day listed if it is priced right.J, Your generalizations are ridiculous.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:11 AM #119722
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
I’m in the mortgage biz in Murrieta and can give you the truth about your financing possibilities.
Anybody can say that, I’ll prove it to you.You didn’t say exactly how much you have to put down.
Did you ask for any seller contribution to your closing costs ?If it’s your dream home, it is already a whole lot less than you would have paid several years ago.
It is probably going to drop in value more, but monthly rents may not drop. It’s still going to cost you to live somehwere every month.If you are willing to look at a non-recourse purchase loan for what it is, then you will just be renting from the lender for awhile, with a slight possibility of appreciation, maybe, someday.
Without knowing what you qualify for, it’s impossible to quote a rate or payment.
With 10% down, If you are looking at a fully amortized payment, fixed for 30 years, with MI, at the PAR rate, your net housing expense (PITI) per month will be over $3000 per month EVEN IF your situation/credit score/income is perfect.
With 20% down, a $360K loan at par TODAY would have payments of $2154 PI. + TI
No matter what you decide to do in CA, buying rental property for CASH is not a wise thing to do.
There are other creative ways to look at your situation.
J, Your comments are simply foolish.
I’ve had the same accountant who I respect and have used for over 25 years, and he doesn’t understand the first thing about originating a loan, nor does he want to review loan docs. That’s not his concern.
AND
A home can be sold on the first day listed if it is priced right.J, Your generalizations are ridiculous.
-
December 18, 2007 at 8:11 AM #119740
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
I’m in the mortgage biz in Murrieta and can give you the truth about your financing possibilities.
Anybody can say that, I’ll prove it to you.You didn’t say exactly how much you have to put down.
Did you ask for any seller contribution to your closing costs ?If it’s your dream home, it is already a whole lot less than you would have paid several years ago.
It is probably going to drop in value more, but monthly rents may not drop. It’s still going to cost you to live somehwere every month.If you are willing to look at a non-recourse purchase loan for what it is, then you will just be renting from the lender for awhile, with a slight possibility of appreciation, maybe, someday.
Without knowing what you qualify for, it’s impossible to quote a rate or payment.
With 10% down, If you are looking at a fully amortized payment, fixed for 30 years, with MI, at the PAR rate, your net housing expense (PITI) per month will be over $3000 per month EVEN IF your situation/credit score/income is perfect.
With 20% down, a $360K loan at par TODAY would have payments of $2154 PI. + TI
No matter what you decide to do in CA, buying rental property for CASH is not a wise thing to do.
There are other creative ways to look at your situation.
J, Your comments are simply foolish.
I’ve had the same accountant who I respect and have used for over 25 years, and he doesn’t understand the first thing about originating a loan, nor does he want to review loan docs. That’s not his concern.
AND
A home can be sold on the first day listed if it is priced right.J, Your generalizations are ridiculous.
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:36 AM #119623
j
ParticipantIf the $3000 is the total looks like it is about the same to buy as rent after taxes. But with 10,000 foreclosures a month in the Inland Empire prices will go down.
Make sure you are getting a good loan. Do not trust the broker; take your loan papers to your CPA. Look at all the fools that did not; it is worth a $100.
Plus, you will be stuck; it takes 6 to 18 months to sell.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:36 AM #119655
j
ParticipantIf the $3000 is the total looks like it is about the same to buy as rent after taxes. But with 10,000 foreclosures a month in the Inland Empire prices will go down.
Make sure you are getting a good loan. Do not trust the broker; take your loan papers to your CPA. Look at all the fools that did not; it is worth a $100.
Plus, you will be stuck; it takes 6 to 18 months to sell.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:36 AM #119701
j
ParticipantIf the $3000 is the total looks like it is about the same to buy as rent after taxes. But with 10,000 foreclosures a month in the Inland Empire prices will go down.
Make sure you are getting a good loan. Do not trust the broker; take your loan papers to your CPA. Look at all the fools that did not; it is worth a $100.
Plus, you will be stuck; it takes 6 to 18 months to sell.
-
December 18, 2007 at 7:36 AM #119720
j
ParticipantIf the $3000 is the total looks like it is about the same to buy as rent after taxes. But with 10,000 foreclosures a month in the Inland Empire prices will go down.
Make sure you are getting a good loan. Do not trust the broker; take your loan papers to your CPA. Look at all the fools that did not; it is worth a $100.
Plus, you will be stuck; it takes 6 to 18 months to sell.
-
December 18, 2007 at 10:23 AM #119629
SD Realtor
ParticipantBluefins my read would be as follows… To me the nice thing about the outlying areas such as Temecula and Murrieta is that they have been leading the curve downward. While many people who are looking for more premium areas like CV, 4S, LCV etc, and frustrated by lack of movement or slower movements, this is not the case for the area you are looking in.
It could is arguable that areas that have depreciated substantially will hit a support level sooner because eventually the properties will pencil out to investors. Please do not confuse my statement with saying Murrieta is going to stop depreciating. The truth is that I have no clue if it will or will not. I would SPECULATE that it will continue to move down HOWEVER I THINK it could bottom out sooner then say more premium areas of San Diego. Thus, while I believe a bottom is achieved sometime on 2010 or 2011 for some parts of town, you may find significant risk reduction in Murrieta by waiting another year or 18 months as opposed to say 3 years.
Now, will the drop in price mitigate the rise in interest rates? Hard to say. I think it will because rising interest rates will push pricing lower.
Probably not to helpful but hopefully you get something out of it. You did not mention any intangibles about the home such as how long it was on the market, recent comps in the neighborhood, etc…
My personal read is that if you pull out and chill for another year you will get a better deal then todays deal.
SD Realtor
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM #119783
bluefins
ParticipantThank you Piggington’s. You guys are awesome!
Someone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you’re only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I’m not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:37 PM #119798
Coronita
ParticipantSomeone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you're only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I'm not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
When do your kids go to college, and have you saved up for that?
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM #119834
bluefins
ParticipantMy oldest is a junior in H.S. I also have a sophomore, a 6th grader and a 4th grader. I have not saved for their college. I was actually thinking I would by them each a house someplace like Indiana. When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans. Their education would be funded in their name and if they dont graduate, they would be responsible for it.
Worst case scenario would be JC or at the very least supplement their college experience with classes from city etc.
I’m sure these scenarios are full of holes, but when both parents are educators all options have to be on the table.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM #119968
bluefins
ParticipantMy oldest is a junior in H.S. I also have a sophomore, a 6th grader and a 4th grader. I have not saved for their college. I was actually thinking I would by them each a house someplace like Indiana. When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans. Their education would be funded in their name and if they dont graduate, they would be responsible for it.
Worst case scenario would be JC or at the very least supplement their college experience with classes from city etc.
I’m sure these scenarios are full of holes, but when both parents are educators all options have to be on the table.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM #120001
bluefins
ParticipantMy oldest is a junior in H.S. I also have a sophomore, a 6th grader and a 4th grader. I have not saved for their college. I was actually thinking I would by them each a house someplace like Indiana. When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans. Their education would be funded in their name and if they dont graduate, they would be responsible for it.
Worst case scenario would be JC or at the very least supplement their college experience with classes from city etc.
I’m sure these scenarios are full of holes, but when both parents are educators all options have to be on the table.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM #120047
bluefins
ParticipantMy oldest is a junior in H.S. I also have a sophomore, a 6th grader and a 4th grader. I have not saved for their college. I was actually thinking I would by them each a house someplace like Indiana. When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans. Their education would be funded in their name and if they dont graduate, they would be responsible for it.
Worst case scenario would be JC or at the very least supplement their college experience with classes from city etc.
I’m sure these scenarios are full of holes, but when both parents are educators all options have to be on the table.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM #120066
bluefins
ParticipantMy oldest is a junior in H.S. I also have a sophomore, a 6th grader and a 4th grader. I have not saved for their college. I was actually thinking I would by them each a house someplace like Indiana. When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans. Their education would be funded in their name and if they dont graduate, they would be responsible for it.
Worst case scenario would be JC or at the very least supplement their college experience with classes from city etc.
I’m sure these scenarios are full of holes, but when both parents are educators all options have to be on the table.
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:37 PM #119934
Coronita
ParticipantSomeone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you're only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I'm not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
When do your kids go to college, and have you saved up for that?
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:37 PM #119965
Coronita
ParticipantSomeone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you're only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I'm not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
When do your kids go to college, and have you saved up for that?
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:37 PM #120012
Coronita
ParticipantSomeone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you're only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I'm not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
When do your kids go to college, and have you saved up for that?
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:37 PM #120031
Coronita
ParticipantSomeone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you're only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I'm not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
When do your kids go to college, and have you saved up for that?
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:51 PM #119819
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
It’s not a matter of buying one or buying 10.
Realistically, it’s buying 3 or 4 with financing instead of 1, which can lead to better cash flow from the same initial investment. You can benefit from appreciation or suffer from depreciation.I fully understand property in sleepy little towns in the midwest. Vacancies can be hard to fill, esp with quality tenants, in a “sleepy little farm town”
They often have very little chance of appreciating much.
For $60K, I don’t think that you get perfect condition, and upkeep, taxes, insurance and absentee management will greatly eat into your returns.Is there a reason why the properties remain unsold when the return appears to be so good ?
Plenty of local farmers have plenty of money. Are they snapping up these houses for the great returns ?Although your idea is good, I think that the premise of your plan is flawed.
If you can’t do both, what’s more important to you;
your long term goal which may become a disappointment
OR
Having your affordable dream home for your family to reside. -
December 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM #119853
surveyor
Participantindiana out-of-state investing
According to my information and research, Indiana real estate (and the whole area around it) appreciation tends to lag inflation and as such underperforms as an appreciating asset. However, the area does cash flow well.
In terms of the stock market, Indiana real estate performs like a bond fund. Slow, and sometimes lags inflation.
HLS does have a point. In terms of real estate, why plop down your entire money lump into one property, when you can diversify and put it over several properties? It also makes sense from a tax standpoint because you can probably decrease your taxes more with several properties (using depreciation) than one.
All I can say is to do the hard math and see which performs better.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM #119878
RatherOpinionated
Participant“When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans.”
So this means you would encumber them with properties and turn them into landlords half way across the country. What if they want to focus on their careers after spending all that time studying and now playing landlord to a home in Indiana. What if there is a vacancy, who pays the mortgage? If it goes negative will they go further into debt?
If I were a fresh graduate I don’t think I’d want to deal with a property barely spinning off any cash flow half way across the country. I’d rather focus on work and pay off my own loans.
Heck, if I were them I would just SELL it since you gave them the deed, and use the proceeds to pay off the loans faster.
Buy the home in Murrieta, and start focusing on saving for college and retirement. Or tell your kids now they are on their own for college and get them to start saving!
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500]
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM #120013
RatherOpinionated
Participant“When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans.”
So this means you would encumber them with properties and turn them into landlords half way across the country. What if they want to focus on their careers after spending all that time studying and now playing landlord to a home in Indiana. What if there is a vacancy, who pays the mortgage? If it goes negative will they go further into debt?
If I were a fresh graduate I don’t think I’d want to deal with a property barely spinning off any cash flow half way across the country. I’d rather focus on work and pay off my own loans.
Heck, if I were them I would just SELL it since you gave them the deed, and use the proceeds to pay off the loans faster.
Buy the home in Murrieta, and start focusing on saving for college and retirement. Or tell your kids now they are on their own for college and get them to start saving!
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500]
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM #120045
RatherOpinionated
Participant“When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans.”
So this means you would encumber them with properties and turn them into landlords half way across the country. What if they want to focus on their careers after spending all that time studying and now playing landlord to a home in Indiana. What if there is a vacancy, who pays the mortgage? If it goes negative will they go further into debt?
If I were a fresh graduate I don’t think I’d want to deal with a property barely spinning off any cash flow half way across the country. I’d rather focus on work and pay off my own loans.
Heck, if I were them I would just SELL it since you gave them the deed, and use the proceeds to pay off the loans faster.
Buy the home in Murrieta, and start focusing on saving for college and retirement. Or tell your kids now they are on their own for college and get them to start saving!
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500]
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM #120092
RatherOpinionated
Participant“When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans.”
So this means you would encumber them with properties and turn them into landlords half way across the country. What if they want to focus on their careers after spending all that time studying and now playing landlord to a home in Indiana. What if there is a vacancy, who pays the mortgage? If it goes negative will they go further into debt?
If I were a fresh graduate I don’t think I’d want to deal with a property barely spinning off any cash flow half way across the country. I’d rather focus on work and pay off my own loans.
Heck, if I were them I would just SELL it since you gave them the deed, and use the proceeds to pay off the loans faster.
Buy the home in Murrieta, and start focusing on saving for college and retirement. Or tell your kids now they are on their own for college and get them to start saving!
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500]
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM #120112
RatherOpinionated
Participant“When each of them graduate I would turn over the deed to the property and they could use the income to pay off their student loans.”
So this means you would encumber them with properties and turn them into landlords half way across the country. What if they want to focus on their careers after spending all that time studying and now playing landlord to a home in Indiana. What if there is a vacancy, who pays the mortgage? If it goes negative will they go further into debt?
If I were a fresh graduate I don’t think I’d want to deal with a property barely spinning off any cash flow half way across the country. I’d rather focus on work and pay off my own loans.
Heck, if I were them I would just SELL it since you gave them the deed, and use the proceeds to pay off the loans faster.
Buy the home in Murrieta, and start focusing on saving for college and retirement. Or tell your kids now they are on their own for college and get them to start saving!
[img_assist|nid=5758|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=419|height=500]
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:46 PM #119919
HLS
ParticipantDepreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.
Simple math, net projected REALISTIC income, WITH a vacancy factor needs to be done.
Lenders usually only allow 75% of rental income to allow for vacancy,maintenance,utilities, etc.If someone already has their primary residence in place and financed well, paying cash for rental property in a “midwest sleepy farm town” would still be a foolish thing to do IMO, but better than blowing it on something that would never return anything.
There are many people that have made money from real estate (and stocks)that made foolish choices by conventional standards when they bought, but still did well. Was that luck or a skill ??
This will always happen. There are people buying today that may or may not be as lucky.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM #119949
Jumby
Participant“Depreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.”
Given their situation, both working and making over 150k a year I would agree.
I would like to add that; if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000, you can offset up to $25,000 of your ordinary income from “losses” in real estate (depreciation, operating expenses and interest on the loan). These “losses” are an awesome tax shelter that essentially leaves more money to invest and further build your portfolio.
Yes, depreciation has to be eventually recaptured, but factoring in the time value of money, you will be using this to further increase your return (before it’s recaptured). Also, once finally recaptured you could have put yourself in a lower tax bracket and get taxed much less.
So essentially, I don’t see depreciation as a bonus. I see it has a major wealth building tool when combined with proper leverage and property selection.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM #119969
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefin,
Since you have lived at Harveston, would you reply to the new thread I started “Have you lived at Harveston?”
By the way, what school district(s) do you and your wife work for? I am at MSJC.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM #120103
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefin,
Since you have lived at Harveston, would you reply to the new thread I started “Have you lived at Harveston?”
By the way, what school district(s) do you and your wife work for? I am at MSJC.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM #120135
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefin,
Since you have lived at Harveston, would you reply to the new thread I started “Have you lived at Harveston?”
By the way, what school district(s) do you and your wife work for? I am at MSJC.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM #120181
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefin,
Since you have lived at Harveston, would you reply to the new thread I started “Have you lived at Harveston?”
By the way, what school district(s) do you and your wife work for? I am at MSJC.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM #120202
mydogsarelazy
ParticipantHi Bluefin,
Since you have lived at Harveston, would you reply to the new thread I started “Have you lived at Harveston?”
By the way, what school district(s) do you and your wife work for? I am at MSJC.
JS
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM #119979
HLS
ParticipantJumby,
Of course it is a benefit, I didn’t say that it wasn’t.Personally, I want it to be a bonus, and not have to figure it into the equation to stretch to see if the investment makes sense.
When you’ve been around awhile, there is also such thing as too much depreciation, which gets carried forward for a very, very long time before it may become useful.
Feel free to factor in if you want, I prefer it to be a bonus.
Pizza, you can email me at [email protected] and I will send you my contact info. Please post if you do, as that is an email address that I only check when prompted.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM #120113
HLS
ParticipantJumby,
Of course it is a benefit, I didn’t say that it wasn’t.Personally, I want it to be a bonus, and not have to figure it into the equation to stretch to see if the investment makes sense.
When you’ve been around awhile, there is also such thing as too much depreciation, which gets carried forward for a very, very long time before it may become useful.
Feel free to factor in if you want, I prefer it to be a bonus.
Pizza, you can email me at [email protected] and I will send you my contact info. Please post if you do, as that is an email address that I only check when prompted.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM #120145
HLS
ParticipantJumby,
Of course it is a benefit, I didn’t say that it wasn’t.Personally, I want it to be a bonus, and not have to figure it into the equation to stretch to see if the investment makes sense.
When you’ve been around awhile, there is also such thing as too much depreciation, which gets carried forward for a very, very long time before it may become useful.
Feel free to factor in if you want, I prefer it to be a bonus.
Pizza, you can email me at [email protected] and I will send you my contact info. Please post if you do, as that is an email address that I only check when prompted.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM #120191
HLS
ParticipantJumby,
Of course it is a benefit, I didn’t say that it wasn’t.Personally, I want it to be a bonus, and not have to figure it into the equation to stretch to see if the investment makes sense.
When you’ve been around awhile, there is also such thing as too much depreciation, which gets carried forward for a very, very long time before it may become useful.
Feel free to factor in if you want, I prefer it to be a bonus.
Pizza, you can email me at [email protected] and I will send you my contact info. Please post if you do, as that is an email address that I only check when prompted.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM #120212
HLS
ParticipantJumby,
Of course it is a benefit, I didn’t say that it wasn’t.Personally, I want it to be a bonus, and not have to figure it into the equation to stretch to see if the investment makes sense.
When you’ve been around awhile, there is also such thing as too much depreciation, which gets carried forward for a very, very long time before it may become useful.
Feel free to factor in if you want, I prefer it to be a bonus.
Pizza, you can email me at [email protected] and I will send you my contact info. Please post if you do, as that is an email address that I only check when prompted.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM #120083
Jumby
Participant“Depreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.”
Given their situation, both working and making over 150k a year I would agree.
I would like to add that; if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000, you can offset up to $25,000 of your ordinary income from “losses” in real estate (depreciation, operating expenses and interest on the loan). These “losses” are an awesome tax shelter that essentially leaves more money to invest and further build your portfolio.
Yes, depreciation has to be eventually recaptured, but factoring in the time value of money, you will be using this to further increase your return (before it’s recaptured). Also, once finally recaptured you could have put yourself in a lower tax bracket and get taxed much less.
So essentially, I don’t see depreciation as a bonus. I see it has a major wealth building tool when combined with proper leverage and property selection.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM #120115
Jumby
Participant“Depreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.”
Given their situation, both working and making over 150k a year I would agree.
I would like to add that; if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000, you can offset up to $25,000 of your ordinary income from “losses” in real estate (depreciation, operating expenses and interest on the loan). These “losses” are an awesome tax shelter that essentially leaves more money to invest and further build your portfolio.
Yes, depreciation has to be eventually recaptured, but factoring in the time value of money, you will be using this to further increase your return (before it’s recaptured). Also, once finally recaptured you could have put yourself in a lower tax bracket and get taxed much less.
So essentially, I don’t see depreciation as a bonus. I see it has a major wealth building tool when combined with proper leverage and property selection.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM #120161
Jumby
Participant“Depreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.”
Given their situation, both working and making over 150k a year I would agree.
I would like to add that; if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000, you can offset up to $25,000 of your ordinary income from “losses” in real estate (depreciation, operating expenses and interest on the loan). These “losses” are an awesome tax shelter that essentially leaves more money to invest and further build your portfolio.
Yes, depreciation has to be eventually recaptured, but factoring in the time value of money, you will be using this to further increase your return (before it’s recaptured). Also, once finally recaptured you could have put yourself in a lower tax bracket and get taxed much less.
So essentially, I don’t see depreciation as a bonus. I see it has a major wealth building tool when combined with proper leverage and property selection.
-
December 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM #120182
Jumby
Participant“Depreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.”
Given their situation, both working and making over 150k a year I would agree.
I would like to add that; if your adjusted gross income is under $100,000, you can offset up to $25,000 of your ordinary income from “losses” in real estate (depreciation, operating expenses and interest on the loan). These “losses” are an awesome tax shelter that essentially leaves more money to invest and further build your portfolio.
Yes, depreciation has to be eventually recaptured, but factoring in the time value of money, you will be using this to further increase your return (before it’s recaptured). Also, once finally recaptured you could have put yourself in a lower tax bracket and get taxed much less.
So essentially, I don’t see depreciation as a bonus. I see it has a major wealth building tool when combined with proper leverage and property selection.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:46 PM #120053
HLS
ParticipantDepreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.
Simple math, net projected REALISTIC income, WITH a vacancy factor needs to be done.
Lenders usually only allow 75% of rental income to allow for vacancy,maintenance,utilities, etc.If someone already has their primary residence in place and financed well, paying cash for rental property in a “midwest sleepy farm town” would still be a foolish thing to do IMO, but better than blowing it on something that would never return anything.
There are many people that have made money from real estate (and stocks)that made foolish choices by conventional standards when they bought, but still did well. Was that luck or a skill ??
This will always happen. There are people buying today that may or may not be as lucky.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:46 PM #120085
HLS
ParticipantDepreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.
Simple math, net projected REALISTIC income, WITH a vacancy factor needs to be done.
Lenders usually only allow 75% of rental income to allow for vacancy,maintenance,utilities, etc.If someone already has their primary residence in place and financed well, paying cash for rental property in a “midwest sleepy farm town” would still be a foolish thing to do IMO, but better than blowing it on something that would never return anything.
There are many people that have made money from real estate (and stocks)that made foolish choices by conventional standards when they bought, but still did well. Was that luck or a skill ??
This will always happen. There are people buying today that may or may not be as lucky.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:46 PM #120131
HLS
ParticipantDepreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.
Simple math, net projected REALISTIC income, WITH a vacancy factor needs to be done.
Lenders usually only allow 75% of rental income to allow for vacancy,maintenance,utilities, etc.If someone already has their primary residence in place and financed well, paying cash for rental property in a “midwest sleepy farm town” would still be a foolish thing to do IMO, but better than blowing it on something that would never return anything.
There are many people that have made money from real estate (and stocks)that made foolish choices by conventional standards when they bought, but still did well. Was that luck or a skill ??
This will always happen. There are people buying today that may or may not be as lucky.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:46 PM #120152
HLS
ParticipantDepreciation is good, but has to be recaptured eventually. You can defer it for a very long time by trading up using 1031 exchanges, but IMO that is a bonus to buying rental property, and should not be part of the equation.
Simple math, net projected REALISTIC income, WITH a vacancy factor needs to be done.
Lenders usually only allow 75% of rental income to allow for vacancy,maintenance,utilities, etc.If someone already has their primary residence in place and financed well, paying cash for rental property in a “midwest sleepy farm town” would still be a foolish thing to do IMO, but better than blowing it on something that would never return anything.
There are many people that have made money from real estate (and stocks)that made foolish choices by conventional standards when they bought, but still did well. Was that luck or a skill ??
This will always happen. There are people buying today that may or may not be as lucky.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM #119988
surveyor
Participantindiana out-of-state investing
According to my information and research, Indiana real estate (and the whole area around it) appreciation tends to lag inflation and as such underperforms as an appreciating asset. However, the area does cash flow well.
In terms of the stock market, Indiana real estate performs like a bond fund. Slow, and sometimes lags inflation.
HLS does have a point. In terms of real estate, why plop down your entire money lump into one property, when you can diversify and put it over several properties? It also makes sense from a tax standpoint because you can probably decrease your taxes more with several properties (using depreciation) than one.
All I can say is to do the hard math and see which performs better.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM #120020
surveyor
Participantindiana out-of-state investing
According to my information and research, Indiana real estate (and the whole area around it) appreciation tends to lag inflation and as such underperforms as an appreciating asset. However, the area does cash flow well.
In terms of the stock market, Indiana real estate performs like a bond fund. Slow, and sometimes lags inflation.
HLS does have a point. In terms of real estate, why plop down your entire money lump into one property, when you can diversify and put it over several properties? It also makes sense from a tax standpoint because you can probably decrease your taxes more with several properties (using depreciation) than one.
All I can say is to do the hard math and see which performs better.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM #120067
surveyor
Participantindiana out-of-state investing
According to my information and research, Indiana real estate (and the whole area around it) appreciation tends to lag inflation and as such underperforms as an appreciating asset. However, the area does cash flow well.
In terms of the stock market, Indiana real estate performs like a bond fund. Slow, and sometimes lags inflation.
HLS does have a point. In terms of real estate, why plop down your entire money lump into one property, when you can diversify and put it over several properties? It also makes sense from a tax standpoint because you can probably decrease your taxes more with several properties (using depreciation) than one.
All I can say is to do the hard math and see which performs better.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM #120086
surveyor
Participantindiana out-of-state investing
According to my information and research, Indiana real estate (and the whole area around it) appreciation tends to lag inflation and as such underperforms as an appreciating asset. However, the area does cash flow well.
In terms of the stock market, Indiana real estate performs like a bond fund. Slow, and sometimes lags inflation.
HLS does have a point. In terms of real estate, why plop down your entire money lump into one property, when you can diversify and put it over several properties? It also makes sense from a tax standpoint because you can probably decrease your taxes more with several properties (using depreciation) than one.
All I can say is to do the hard math and see which performs better.
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:51 PM #119953
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
It’s not a matter of buying one or buying 10.
Realistically, it’s buying 3 or 4 with financing instead of 1, which can lead to better cash flow from the same initial investment. You can benefit from appreciation or suffer from depreciation.I fully understand property in sleepy little towns in the midwest. Vacancies can be hard to fill, esp with quality tenants, in a “sleepy little farm town”
They often have very little chance of appreciating much.
For $60K, I don’t think that you get perfect condition, and upkeep, taxes, insurance and absentee management will greatly eat into your returns.Is there a reason why the properties remain unsold when the return appears to be so good ?
Plenty of local farmers have plenty of money. Are they snapping up these houses for the great returns ?Although your idea is good, I think that the premise of your plan is flawed.
If you can’t do both, what’s more important to you;
your long term goal which may become a disappointment
OR
Having your affordable dream home for your family to reside. -
December 18, 2007 at 12:51 PM #119986
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
It’s not a matter of buying one or buying 10.
Realistically, it’s buying 3 or 4 with financing instead of 1, which can lead to better cash flow from the same initial investment. You can benefit from appreciation or suffer from depreciation.I fully understand property in sleepy little towns in the midwest. Vacancies can be hard to fill, esp with quality tenants, in a “sleepy little farm town”
They often have very little chance of appreciating much.
For $60K, I don’t think that you get perfect condition, and upkeep, taxes, insurance and absentee management will greatly eat into your returns.Is there a reason why the properties remain unsold when the return appears to be so good ?
Plenty of local farmers have plenty of money. Are they snapping up these houses for the great returns ?Although your idea is good, I think that the premise of your plan is flawed.
If you can’t do both, what’s more important to you;
your long term goal which may become a disappointment
OR
Having your affordable dream home for your family to reside. -
December 18, 2007 at 12:51 PM #120032
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
It’s not a matter of buying one or buying 10.
Realistically, it’s buying 3 or 4 with financing instead of 1, which can lead to better cash flow from the same initial investment. You can benefit from appreciation or suffer from depreciation.I fully understand property in sleepy little towns in the midwest. Vacancies can be hard to fill, esp with quality tenants, in a “sleepy little farm town”
They often have very little chance of appreciating much.
For $60K, I don’t think that you get perfect condition, and upkeep, taxes, insurance and absentee management will greatly eat into your returns.Is there a reason why the properties remain unsold when the return appears to be so good ?
Plenty of local farmers have plenty of money. Are they snapping up these houses for the great returns ?Although your idea is good, I think that the premise of your plan is flawed.
If you can’t do both, what’s more important to you;
your long term goal which may become a disappointment
OR
Having your affordable dream home for your family to reside. -
December 18, 2007 at 12:51 PM #120051
HLS
ParticipantBlue,
It’s not a matter of buying one or buying 10.
Realistically, it’s buying 3 or 4 with financing instead of 1, which can lead to better cash flow from the same initial investment. You can benefit from appreciation or suffer from depreciation.I fully understand property in sleepy little towns in the midwest. Vacancies can be hard to fill, esp with quality tenants, in a “sleepy little farm town”
They often have very little chance of appreciating much.
For $60K, I don’t think that you get perfect condition, and upkeep, taxes, insurance and absentee management will greatly eat into your returns.Is there a reason why the properties remain unsold when the return appears to be so good ?
Plenty of local farmers have plenty of money. Are they snapping up these houses for the great returns ?Although your idea is good, I think that the premise of your plan is flawed.
If you can’t do both, what’s more important to you;
your long term goal which may become a disappointment
OR
Having your affordable dream home for your family to reside.
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM #119918
bluefins
ParticipantThank you Piggington’s. You guys are awesome!
Someone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you’re only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I’m not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM #119950
bluefins
ParticipantThank you Piggington’s. You guys are awesome!
Someone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you’re only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I’m not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM #119997
bluefins
ParticipantThank you Piggington’s. You guys are awesome!
Someone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you’re only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I’m not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:26 PM #120015
bluefins
ParticipantThank you Piggington’s. You guys are awesome!
Someone ask about income and jobs. My wife and I both teach. Combined income of 170K. We have each taught for about 10 years and feel relatively secure. Although the 14 billion dollar deficit sounds frightening. And then as teachers like to say you’re only as good as your last set of test scores! lol
Im not surprised by the comment about investing out of state. I am origionally from Indiana and was back there recently for a funeral. In the the sleepy little farm town there are houses that cost about 60 k that rent from $600- $700 per month. This amount compared to what I get from my 60 k in the bank sounds pretty good. I know there are always those that say why buy one when you can buy ten. But I’m not looking for anything other than a check in the mail each month.
In a perfect world we would buy and pay for one of these a year and continually add to our income. The dilemma for me is that by taking the plunge with the house here, that this plan is not likely. I have made the statement lately to my kids that it is no fun being a grownup and having to make this kind of decision. It seems so obvious until you throw in the desires of a few others. lol
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 10:23 AM #119764
SD Realtor
ParticipantBluefins my read would be as follows… To me the nice thing about the outlying areas such as Temecula and Murrieta is that they have been leading the curve downward. While many people who are looking for more premium areas like CV, 4S, LCV etc, and frustrated by lack of movement or slower movements, this is not the case for the area you are looking in.
It could is arguable that areas that have depreciated substantially will hit a support level sooner because eventually the properties will pencil out to investors. Please do not confuse my statement with saying Murrieta is going to stop depreciating. The truth is that I have no clue if it will or will not. I would SPECULATE that it will continue to move down HOWEVER I THINK it could bottom out sooner then say more premium areas of San Diego. Thus, while I believe a bottom is achieved sometime on 2010 or 2011 for some parts of town, you may find significant risk reduction in Murrieta by waiting another year or 18 months as opposed to say 3 years.
Now, will the drop in price mitigate the rise in interest rates? Hard to say. I think it will because rising interest rates will push pricing lower.
Probably not to helpful but hopefully you get something out of it. You did not mention any intangibles about the home such as how long it was on the market, recent comps in the neighborhood, etc…
My personal read is that if you pull out and chill for another year you will get a better deal then todays deal.
SD Realtor
-
December 18, 2007 at 10:23 AM #119795
SD Realtor
ParticipantBluefins my read would be as follows… To me the nice thing about the outlying areas such as Temecula and Murrieta is that they have been leading the curve downward. While many people who are looking for more premium areas like CV, 4S, LCV etc, and frustrated by lack of movement or slower movements, this is not the case for the area you are looking in.
It could is arguable that areas that have depreciated substantially will hit a support level sooner because eventually the properties will pencil out to investors. Please do not confuse my statement with saying Murrieta is going to stop depreciating. The truth is that I have no clue if it will or will not. I would SPECULATE that it will continue to move down HOWEVER I THINK it could bottom out sooner then say more premium areas of San Diego. Thus, while I believe a bottom is achieved sometime on 2010 or 2011 for some parts of town, you may find significant risk reduction in Murrieta by waiting another year or 18 months as opposed to say 3 years.
Now, will the drop in price mitigate the rise in interest rates? Hard to say. I think it will because rising interest rates will push pricing lower.
Probably not to helpful but hopefully you get something out of it. You did not mention any intangibles about the home such as how long it was on the market, recent comps in the neighborhood, etc…
My personal read is that if you pull out and chill for another year you will get a better deal then todays deal.
SD Realtor
-
December 18, 2007 at 10:23 AM #119842
SD Realtor
ParticipantBluefins my read would be as follows… To me the nice thing about the outlying areas such as Temecula and Murrieta is that they have been leading the curve downward. While many people who are looking for more premium areas like CV, 4S, LCV etc, and frustrated by lack of movement or slower movements, this is not the case for the area you are looking in.
It could is arguable that areas that have depreciated substantially will hit a support level sooner because eventually the properties will pencil out to investors. Please do not confuse my statement with saying Murrieta is going to stop depreciating. The truth is that I have no clue if it will or will not. I would SPECULATE that it will continue to move down HOWEVER I THINK it could bottom out sooner then say more premium areas of San Diego. Thus, while I believe a bottom is achieved sometime on 2010 or 2011 for some parts of town, you may find significant risk reduction in Murrieta by waiting another year or 18 months as opposed to say 3 years.
Now, will the drop in price mitigate the rise in interest rates? Hard to say. I think it will because rising interest rates will push pricing lower.
Probably not to helpful but hopefully you get something out of it. You did not mention any intangibles about the home such as how long it was on the market, recent comps in the neighborhood, etc…
My personal read is that if you pull out and chill for another year you will get a better deal then todays deal.
SD Realtor
-
December 18, 2007 at 10:23 AM #119861
SD Realtor
ParticipantBluefins my read would be as follows… To me the nice thing about the outlying areas such as Temecula and Murrieta is that they have been leading the curve downward. While many people who are looking for more premium areas like CV, 4S, LCV etc, and frustrated by lack of movement or slower movements, this is not the case for the area you are looking in.
It could is arguable that areas that have depreciated substantially will hit a support level sooner because eventually the properties will pencil out to investors. Please do not confuse my statement with saying Murrieta is going to stop depreciating. The truth is that I have no clue if it will or will not. I would SPECULATE that it will continue to move down HOWEVER I THINK it could bottom out sooner then say more premium areas of San Diego. Thus, while I believe a bottom is achieved sometime on 2010 or 2011 for some parts of town, you may find significant risk reduction in Murrieta by waiting another year or 18 months as opposed to say 3 years.
Now, will the drop in price mitigate the rise in interest rates? Hard to say. I think it will because rising interest rates will push pricing lower.
Probably not to helpful but hopefully you get something out of it. You did not mention any intangibles about the home such as how long it was on the market, recent comps in the neighborhood, etc…
My personal read is that if you pull out and chill for another year you will get a better deal then todays deal.
SD Realtor
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:05 PM #119848
pizzaman
ParticipantHey Bluefins looks like we are neighbors. From your property description its apparent that you are referring to Bremerton. Currently I am renting in the project. If you have been following he recent sales you have probably noticed that the REO prices have been coming down in chunks. If the street I live on is any indication this project still has some rough times ahead. I know of at least 3 homes on my street that are likely headed to foreclosure.
Having said that 450k on the creek is pretty attractive (today).
Would I be right to guess the house is on Whitaker? That would be my preferred side of the project away from the noise and traffic from he schools.
Make sure that you are comfortable with the property tax and HOA fees, there pretty high even for Murrieta.-
December 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM #119863
bluefins
Participantpizza,
Its the third house from the end! The taxes are the reason we bailed the first time. At 650 k the taxes would have been 14.4k. The origional owner would have paid over 15k. Based on the current numbers would be 9k which is still horrific. Another thing is that Im tired of writing those 20 k checks to the IRS.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM #119998
bluefins
Participantpizza,
Its the third house from the end! The taxes are the reason we bailed the first time. At 650 k the taxes would have been 14.4k. The origional owner would have paid over 15k. Based on the current numbers would be 9k which is still horrific. Another thing is that Im tired of writing those 20 k checks to the IRS.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM #120030
bluefins
Participantpizza,
Its the third house from the end! The taxes are the reason we bailed the first time. At 650 k the taxes would have been 14.4k. The origional owner would have paid over 15k. Based on the current numbers would be 9k which is still horrific. Another thing is that Im tired of writing those 20 k checks to the IRS.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM #120077
bluefins
Participantpizza,
Its the third house from the end! The taxes are the reason we bailed the first time. At 650 k the taxes would have been 14.4k. The origional owner would have paid over 15k. Based on the current numbers would be 9k which is still horrific. Another thing is that Im tired of writing those 20 k checks to the IRS.
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:15 PM #120096
bluefins
Participantpizza,
Its the third house from the end! The taxes are the reason we bailed the first time. At 650 k the taxes would have been 14.4k. The origional owner would have paid over 15k. Based on the current numbers would be 9k which is still horrific. Another thing is that Im tired of writing those 20 k checks to the IRS.
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 1:05 PM #119983
pizzaman
ParticipantHey Bluefins looks like we are neighbors. From your property description its apparent that you are referring to Bremerton. Currently I am renting in the project. If you have been following he recent sales you have probably noticed that the REO prices have been coming down in chunks. If the street I live on is any indication this project still has some rough times ahead. I know of at least 3 homes on my street that are likely headed to foreclosure.
Having said that 450k on the creek is pretty attractive (today).
Would I be right to guess the house is on Whitaker? That would be my preferred side of the project away from the noise and traffic from he schools.
Make sure that you are comfortable with the property tax and HOA fees, there pretty high even for Murrieta. -
December 18, 2007 at 1:05 PM #120016
pizzaman
ParticipantHey Bluefins looks like we are neighbors. From your property description its apparent that you are referring to Bremerton. Currently I am renting in the project. If you have been following he recent sales you have probably noticed that the REO prices have been coming down in chunks. If the street I live on is any indication this project still has some rough times ahead. I know of at least 3 homes on my street that are likely headed to foreclosure.
Having said that 450k on the creek is pretty attractive (today).
Would I be right to guess the house is on Whitaker? That would be my preferred side of the project away from the noise and traffic from he schools.
Make sure that you are comfortable with the property tax and HOA fees, there pretty high even for Murrieta. -
December 18, 2007 at 1:05 PM #120062
pizzaman
ParticipantHey Bluefins looks like we are neighbors. From your property description its apparent that you are referring to Bremerton. Currently I am renting in the project. If you have been following he recent sales you have probably noticed that the REO prices have been coming down in chunks. If the street I live on is any indication this project still has some rough times ahead. I know of at least 3 homes on my street that are likely headed to foreclosure.
Having said that 450k on the creek is pretty attractive (today).
Would I be right to guess the house is on Whitaker? That would be my preferred side of the project away from the noise and traffic from he schools.
Make sure that you are comfortable with the property tax and HOA fees, there pretty high even for Murrieta. -
December 18, 2007 at 1:05 PM #120081
pizzaman
ParticipantHey Bluefins looks like we are neighbors. From your property description its apparent that you are referring to Bremerton. Currently I am renting in the project. If you have been following he recent sales you have probably noticed that the REO prices have been coming down in chunks. If the street I live on is any indication this project still has some rough times ahead. I know of at least 3 homes on my street that are likely headed to foreclosure.
Having said that 450k on the creek is pretty attractive (today).
Would I be right to guess the house is on Whitaker? That would be my preferred side of the project away from the noise and traffic from he schools.
Make sure that you are comfortable with the property tax and HOA fees, there pretty high even for Murrieta. -
December 18, 2007 at 2:16 PM #119933
pizzaman
ParticipantBluefins
I’m sure you are aware of this but that house on Whitaker doesn’t really have 1/3 acre that is usable. A good portion of the lot is on the creek side of the back yard fence. Still its one of the premium lots in the development. If lot size is important you might consider this one. http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233233
Although the house is less sq footage the lot is all usable and it has access to the park next door. You probably remember that it was one of the models. Currently its a short sale but I’m sure the bank will have it back soon enough.HLS
Can you leave some contact info I may be in the market for a mortgage soon. -
December 18, 2007 at 2:16 PM #120068
pizzaman
ParticipantBluefins
I’m sure you are aware of this but that house on Whitaker doesn’t really have 1/3 acre that is usable. A good portion of the lot is on the creek side of the back yard fence. Still its one of the premium lots in the development. If lot size is important you might consider this one. http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233233
Although the house is less sq footage the lot is all usable and it has access to the park next door. You probably remember that it was one of the models. Currently its a short sale but I’m sure the bank will have it back soon enough.HLS
Can you leave some contact info I may be in the market for a mortgage soon. -
December 18, 2007 at 2:16 PM #120100
pizzaman
ParticipantBluefins
I’m sure you are aware of this but that house on Whitaker doesn’t really have 1/3 acre that is usable. A good portion of the lot is on the creek side of the back yard fence. Still its one of the premium lots in the development. If lot size is important you might consider this one. http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233233
Although the house is less sq footage the lot is all usable and it has access to the park next door. You probably remember that it was one of the models. Currently its a short sale but I’m sure the bank will have it back soon enough.HLS
Can you leave some contact info I may be in the market for a mortgage soon. -
December 18, 2007 at 2:16 PM #120146
pizzaman
ParticipantBluefins
I’m sure you are aware of this but that house on Whitaker doesn’t really have 1/3 acre that is usable. A good portion of the lot is on the creek side of the back yard fence. Still its one of the premium lots in the development. If lot size is important you might consider this one. http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233233
Although the house is less sq footage the lot is all usable and it has access to the park next door. You probably remember that it was one of the models. Currently its a short sale but I’m sure the bank will have it back soon enough.HLS
Can you leave some contact info I may be in the market for a mortgage soon. -
December 18, 2007 at 2:16 PM #120167
pizzaman
ParticipantBluefins
I’m sure you are aware of this but that house on Whitaker doesn’t really have 1/3 acre that is usable. A good portion of the lot is on the creek side of the back yard fence. Still its one of the premium lots in the development. If lot size is important you might consider this one. http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/printable-listing?listing-id=1233233
Although the house is less sq footage the lot is all usable and it has access to the park next door. You probably remember that it was one of the models. Currently its a short sale but I’m sure the bank will have it back soon enough.HLS
Can you leave some contact info I may be in the market for a mortgage soon. -
December 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM #120019
pizzaman
ParticipantHLS
Check your email-
December 18, 2007 at 3:29 PM #120033
HLS
ParticipantPIZ,,
Info sent. Thanks.-
December 24, 2007 at 12:26 PM #123544
bluefins
ParticipantI wanted to let the board know the decision we made. This was concerning the house that we had picked options for 2 1/2 years ago. The house is in forclosure and we had an offer accepted at 450K. I described it as a beautiful home on a 1/3 acre with unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Plateau. The home sold for 690k 2 years ago.
The two issues that we struggled with were the property taxes 9 k. This is down from 14.4 which is the origional reason we backed out of the deal 2 1/2 years go. The other issue was the cost involved to obtain a reasonable payment without PMI. We would have needed to put down about 100 k. The reality is that I’m not ready to cash in other investments and put everything into the real estate basket.
The most important reason for not going through with the purchase occurred after talking our landlord. We ( wife and 4 kids) have been bounced around 2 out of the past two years. I knew our lease was expiring in Feb. and needless to say I get a little anxious around this time. The reason I even considered a purchase at this time was because I didnt think the family could sustain another forced move into a rental.
After talking to the landlord he agreed to allowing us to stay on a month to month basis. We had prenegotiated a $100 increase at the beginning of the second year.I explained at some point we would be purchasing and would not accept a longer term lease. Because one of the previous homes we lived in was forclosed on the financial stability of the owner is important. I’m confident that our owner is a well capitalized owner and there is a very small chance of forclosure. He explained that some other tenants of his have lived in one of his properties for 10 years.
With all this in mind we decided to stay put and not to pursue the purchase at this time. However, if the price drops another 50 k it would be hard to resist. Thank you all for your input!
-
December 24, 2007 at 2:08 PM #123574
paramount
Participant170k for (2) teachers – no wonder this state is going broke.
SD Realtor: I don’t think 4S is any more “premium” than Temecula in general, it’s just closer to job centers. But that alone does not make it more premium – even the weather is not that much different.
-
December 24, 2007 at 2:08 PM #123720
paramount
Participant170k for (2) teachers – no wonder this state is going broke.
SD Realtor: I don’t think 4S is any more “premium” than Temecula in general, it’s just closer to job centers. But that alone does not make it more premium – even the weather is not that much different.
-
December 24, 2007 at 2:08 PM #123745
paramount
Participant170k for (2) teachers – no wonder this state is going broke.
SD Realtor: I don’t think 4S is any more “premium” than Temecula in general, it’s just closer to job centers. But that alone does not make it more premium – even the weather is not that much different.
-
December 24, 2007 at 2:08 PM #123803
paramount
Participant170k for (2) teachers – no wonder this state is going broke.
SD Realtor: I don’t think 4S is any more “premium” than Temecula in general, it’s just closer to job centers. But that alone does not make it more premium – even the weather is not that much different.
-
December 24, 2007 at 2:08 PM #123821
paramount
Participant170k for (2) teachers – no wonder this state is going broke.
SD Realtor: I don’t think 4S is any more “premium” than Temecula in general, it’s just closer to job centers. But that alone does not make it more premium – even the weather is not that much different.
-
December 24, 2007 at 12:26 PM #123689
bluefins
ParticipantI wanted to let the board know the decision we made. This was concerning the house that we had picked options for 2 1/2 years ago. The house is in forclosure and we had an offer accepted at 450K. I described it as a beautiful home on a 1/3 acre with unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Plateau. The home sold for 690k 2 years ago.
The two issues that we struggled with were the property taxes 9 k. This is down from 14.4 which is the origional reason we backed out of the deal 2 1/2 years go. The other issue was the cost involved to obtain a reasonable payment without PMI. We would have needed to put down about 100 k. The reality is that I’m not ready to cash in other investments and put everything into the real estate basket.
The most important reason for not going through with the purchase occurred after talking our landlord. We ( wife and 4 kids) have been bounced around 2 out of the past two years. I knew our lease was expiring in Feb. and needless to say I get a little anxious around this time. The reason I even considered a purchase at this time was because I didnt think the family could sustain another forced move into a rental.
After talking to the landlord he agreed to allowing us to stay on a month to month basis. We had prenegotiated a $100 increase at the beginning of the second year.I explained at some point we would be purchasing and would not accept a longer term lease. Because one of the previous homes we lived in was forclosed on the financial stability of the owner is important. I’m confident that our owner is a well capitalized owner and there is a very small chance of forclosure. He explained that some other tenants of his have lived in one of his properties for 10 years.
With all this in mind we decided to stay put and not to pursue the purchase at this time. However, if the price drops another 50 k it would be hard to resist. Thank you all for your input!
-
December 24, 2007 at 12:26 PM #123714
bluefins
ParticipantI wanted to let the board know the decision we made. This was concerning the house that we had picked options for 2 1/2 years ago. The house is in forclosure and we had an offer accepted at 450K. I described it as a beautiful home on a 1/3 acre with unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Plateau. The home sold for 690k 2 years ago.
The two issues that we struggled with were the property taxes 9 k. This is down from 14.4 which is the origional reason we backed out of the deal 2 1/2 years go. The other issue was the cost involved to obtain a reasonable payment without PMI. We would have needed to put down about 100 k. The reality is that I’m not ready to cash in other investments and put everything into the real estate basket.
The most important reason for not going through with the purchase occurred after talking our landlord. We ( wife and 4 kids) have been bounced around 2 out of the past two years. I knew our lease was expiring in Feb. and needless to say I get a little anxious around this time. The reason I even considered a purchase at this time was because I didnt think the family could sustain another forced move into a rental.
After talking to the landlord he agreed to allowing us to stay on a month to month basis. We had prenegotiated a $100 increase at the beginning of the second year.I explained at some point we would be purchasing and would not accept a longer term lease. Because one of the previous homes we lived in was forclosed on the financial stability of the owner is important. I’m confident that our owner is a well capitalized owner and there is a very small chance of forclosure. He explained that some other tenants of his have lived in one of his properties for 10 years.
With all this in mind we decided to stay put and not to pursue the purchase at this time. However, if the price drops another 50 k it would be hard to resist. Thank you all for your input!
-
December 24, 2007 at 12:26 PM #123770
bluefins
ParticipantI wanted to let the board know the decision we made. This was concerning the house that we had picked options for 2 1/2 years ago. The house is in forclosure and we had an offer accepted at 450K. I described it as a beautiful home on a 1/3 acre with unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Plateau. The home sold for 690k 2 years ago.
The two issues that we struggled with were the property taxes 9 k. This is down from 14.4 which is the origional reason we backed out of the deal 2 1/2 years go. The other issue was the cost involved to obtain a reasonable payment without PMI. We would have needed to put down about 100 k. The reality is that I’m not ready to cash in other investments and put everything into the real estate basket.
The most important reason for not going through with the purchase occurred after talking our landlord. We ( wife and 4 kids) have been bounced around 2 out of the past two years. I knew our lease was expiring in Feb. and needless to say I get a little anxious around this time. The reason I even considered a purchase at this time was because I didnt think the family could sustain another forced move into a rental.
After talking to the landlord he agreed to allowing us to stay on a month to month basis. We had prenegotiated a $100 increase at the beginning of the second year.I explained at some point we would be purchasing and would not accept a longer term lease. Because one of the previous homes we lived in was forclosed on the financial stability of the owner is important. I’m confident that our owner is a well capitalized owner and there is a very small chance of forclosure. He explained that some other tenants of his have lived in one of his properties for 10 years.
With all this in mind we decided to stay put and not to pursue the purchase at this time. However, if the price drops another 50 k it would be hard to resist. Thank you all for your input!
-
December 24, 2007 at 12:26 PM #123789
bluefins
ParticipantI wanted to let the board know the decision we made. This was concerning the house that we had picked options for 2 1/2 years ago. The house is in forclosure and we had an offer accepted at 450K. I described it as a beautiful home on a 1/3 acre with unobstructed views of the Santa Rosa Plateau. The home sold for 690k 2 years ago.
The two issues that we struggled with were the property taxes 9 k. This is down from 14.4 which is the origional reason we backed out of the deal 2 1/2 years go. The other issue was the cost involved to obtain a reasonable payment without PMI. We would have needed to put down about 100 k. The reality is that I’m not ready to cash in other investments and put everything into the real estate basket.
The most important reason for not going through with the purchase occurred after talking our landlord. We ( wife and 4 kids) have been bounced around 2 out of the past two years. I knew our lease was expiring in Feb. and needless to say I get a little anxious around this time. The reason I even considered a purchase at this time was because I didnt think the family could sustain another forced move into a rental.
After talking to the landlord he agreed to allowing us to stay on a month to month basis. We had prenegotiated a $100 increase at the beginning of the second year.I explained at some point we would be purchasing and would not accept a longer term lease. Because one of the previous homes we lived in was forclosed on the financial stability of the owner is important. I’m confident that our owner is a well capitalized owner and there is a very small chance of forclosure. He explained that some other tenants of his have lived in one of his properties for 10 years.
With all this in mind we decided to stay put and not to pursue the purchase at this time. However, if the price drops another 50 k it would be hard to resist. Thank you all for your input!
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 3:29 PM #120169
HLS
ParticipantPIZ,,
Info sent. Thanks. -
December 18, 2007 at 3:29 PM #120200
HLS
ParticipantPIZ,,
Info sent. Thanks. -
December 18, 2007 at 3:29 PM #120246
HLS
ParticipantPIZ,,
Info sent. Thanks. -
December 18, 2007 at 3:29 PM #120267
HLS
ParticipantPIZ,,
Info sent. Thanks.
-
-
December 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM #120154
pizzaman
ParticipantHLS
Check your email -
December 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM #120185
pizzaman
ParticipantHLS
Check your email -
December 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM #120231
pizzaman
ParticipantHLS
Check your email -
December 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM #120254
pizzaman
ParticipantHLS
Check your email -
December 24, 2007 at 4:04 PM #123658
pizzaman
ParticipantI thought you may have decided to pass when I saw the house was back on the MLS. It will be interesting to follow the fate of the house, it really is a premium location and would have had multiple offers during the boom. If it sits it will be a true indication of how bad things really have become. I have seen several houses in the last couple of weeks that I thought would go but they are still sitting.
-
December 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM #123758
bluefins
ParticipantHey Pizzaman,
Its weird knowing that someone in my neighborhood is familiar with several details about our affairs. Please use the information responsibly ! lol.
Honestly, it might serve as a reminder to other piggs about publishing information they would rather have private. It’s probably safe to say that piggs reaches further than any of us know for sure.
Merry Christmas Pizzaman to you and yours and lets hope for wisdom in the new year.
-
December 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM #123903
bluefins
ParticipantHey Pizzaman,
Its weird knowing that someone in my neighborhood is familiar with several details about our affairs. Please use the information responsibly ! lol.
Honestly, it might serve as a reminder to other piggs about publishing information they would rather have private. It’s probably safe to say that piggs reaches further than any of us know for sure.
Merry Christmas Pizzaman to you and yours and lets hope for wisdom in the new year.
-
December 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM #123926
bluefins
ParticipantHey Pizzaman,
Its weird knowing that someone in my neighborhood is familiar with several details about our affairs. Please use the information responsibly ! lol.
Honestly, it might serve as a reminder to other piggs about publishing information they would rather have private. It’s probably safe to say that piggs reaches further than any of us know for sure.
Merry Christmas Pizzaman to you and yours and lets hope for wisdom in the new year.
-
December 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM #123979
bluefins
ParticipantHey Pizzaman,
Its weird knowing that someone in my neighborhood is familiar with several details about our affairs. Please use the information responsibly ! lol.
Honestly, it might serve as a reminder to other piggs about publishing information they would rather have private. It’s probably safe to say that piggs reaches further than any of us know for sure.
Merry Christmas Pizzaman to you and yours and lets hope for wisdom in the new year.
-
December 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM #124001
bluefins
ParticipantHey Pizzaman,
Its weird knowing that someone in my neighborhood is familiar with several details about our affairs. Please use the information responsibly ! lol.
Honestly, it might serve as a reminder to other piggs about publishing information they would rather have private. It’s probably safe to say that piggs reaches further than any of us know for sure.
Merry Christmas Pizzaman to you and yours and lets hope for wisdom in the new year.
-
-
December 24, 2007 at 4:04 PM #123802
pizzaman
ParticipantI thought you may have decided to pass when I saw the house was back on the MLS. It will be interesting to follow the fate of the house, it really is a premium location and would have had multiple offers during the boom. If it sits it will be a true indication of how bad things really have become. I have seen several houses in the last couple of weeks that I thought would go but they are still sitting.
-
December 24, 2007 at 4:04 PM #123824
pizzaman
ParticipantI thought you may have decided to pass when I saw the house was back on the MLS. It will be interesting to follow the fate of the house, it really is a premium location and would have had multiple offers during the boom. If it sits it will be a true indication of how bad things really have become. I have seen several houses in the last couple of weeks that I thought would go but they are still sitting.
-
December 24, 2007 at 4:04 PM #123879
pizzaman
ParticipantI thought you may have decided to pass when I saw the house was back on the MLS. It will be interesting to follow the fate of the house, it really is a premium location and would have had multiple offers during the boom. If it sits it will be a true indication of how bad things really have become. I have seen several houses in the last couple of weeks that I thought would go but they are still sitting.
-
December 24, 2007 at 4:04 PM #123900
pizzaman
ParticipantI thought you may have decided to pass when I saw the house was back on the MLS. It will be interesting to follow the fate of the house, it really is a premium location and would have had multiple offers during the boom. If it sits it will be a true indication of how bad things really have become. I have seen several houses in the last couple of weeks that I thought would go but they are still sitting.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.