- This topic has 195 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 17, 2011 at 6:24 AM #655814January 17, 2011 at 7:34 AM #654722
Anonymous
Guest[quote=walterwhite]just a judge who almost certainly doesn’t care about public opinion in reaching a decision [/quote]
Or a judge who has political aspirations and wants to be sure that there is zero chance that he/she is associated with the release of a “child molester.”
No politician can afford to have a Willie Horton on their record – just ask Huckabee.
January 17, 2011 at 7:34 AM #654784Anonymous
Guest[quote=walterwhite]just a judge who almost certainly doesn’t care about public opinion in reaching a decision [/quote]
Or a judge who has political aspirations and wants to be sure that there is zero chance that he/she is associated with the release of a “child molester.”
No politician can afford to have a Willie Horton on their record – just ask Huckabee.
January 17, 2011 at 7:34 AM #655381Anonymous
Guest[quote=walterwhite]just a judge who almost certainly doesn’t care about public opinion in reaching a decision [/quote]
Or a judge who has political aspirations and wants to be sure that there is zero chance that he/she is associated with the release of a “child molester.”
No politician can afford to have a Willie Horton on their record – just ask Huckabee.
January 17, 2011 at 7:34 AM #655519Anonymous
Guest[quote=walterwhite]just a judge who almost certainly doesn’t care about public opinion in reaching a decision [/quote]
Or a judge who has political aspirations and wants to be sure that there is zero chance that he/she is associated with the release of a “child molester.”
No politician can afford to have a Willie Horton on their record – just ask Huckabee.
January 17, 2011 at 7:34 AM #655849Anonymous
Guest[quote=walterwhite]just a judge who almost certainly doesn’t care about public opinion in reaching a decision [/quote]
Or a judge who has political aspirations and wants to be sure that there is zero chance that he/she is associated with the release of a “child molester.”
No politician can afford to have a Willie Horton on their record – just ask Huckabee.
January 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #654732scaredyclassic
ParticipantTrue although if it’s a superbogus case it could a political mistake for the judge too
January 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #654794scaredyclassic
ParticipantTrue although if it’s a superbogus case it could a political mistake for the judge too
January 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #655391scaredyclassic
ParticipantTrue although if it’s a superbogus case it could a political mistake for the judge too
January 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #655529scaredyclassic
ParticipantTrue although if it’s a superbogus case it could a political mistake for the judge too
January 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #655859scaredyclassic
ParticipantTrue although if it’s a superbogus case it could a political mistake for the judge too
January 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM #654752Coronita
Participant[quote=pri_dk]TG,
I agree that this is only one half of the story in this particular example, but there have been enough of these stories around that I believe there is a real problem with the system.
[quote=temeculaguy]He’s prepping the defense[/quote]
[quote]This is a spin tactic to get the agency to give up[/quote]
You are implying that there is some due process in this case.
The terrifying part of these stories is that there is no defense, and there is no process on which the agency needs to give up.
This story is like something from Kafka – The family has been sentenced with the ultimate punishment, without due process, without appeal, and without any indication that a crime has even been committed.[/quote]
Exactly.
January 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM #654814Coronita
Participant[quote=pri_dk]TG,
I agree that this is only one half of the story in this particular example, but there have been enough of these stories around that I believe there is a real problem with the system.
[quote=temeculaguy]He’s prepping the defense[/quote]
[quote]This is a spin tactic to get the agency to give up[/quote]
You are implying that there is some due process in this case.
The terrifying part of these stories is that there is no defense, and there is no process on which the agency needs to give up.
This story is like something from Kafka – The family has been sentenced with the ultimate punishment, without due process, without appeal, and without any indication that a crime has even been committed.[/quote]
Exactly.
January 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM #655411Coronita
Participant[quote=pri_dk]TG,
I agree that this is only one half of the story in this particular example, but there have been enough of these stories around that I believe there is a real problem with the system.
[quote=temeculaguy]He’s prepping the defense[/quote]
[quote]This is a spin tactic to get the agency to give up[/quote]
You are implying that there is some due process in this case.
The terrifying part of these stories is that there is no defense, and there is no process on which the agency needs to give up.
This story is like something from Kafka – The family has been sentenced with the ultimate punishment, without due process, without appeal, and without any indication that a crime has even been committed.[/quote]
Exactly.
January 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM #655549Coronita
Participant[quote=pri_dk]TG,
I agree that this is only one half of the story in this particular example, but there have been enough of these stories around that I believe there is a real problem with the system.
[quote=temeculaguy]He’s prepping the defense[/quote]
[quote]This is a spin tactic to get the agency to give up[/quote]
You are implying that there is some due process in this case.
The terrifying part of these stories is that there is no defense, and there is no process on which the agency needs to give up.
This story is like something from Kafka – The family has been sentenced with the ultimate punishment, without due process, without appeal, and without any indication that a crime has even been committed.[/quote]
Exactly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
