- This topic has 32 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 9 months ago by FlyerInHi.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2016 at 4:27 PM #799159June 26, 2016 at 7:08 PM #799161SK in CVParticipant
According to someone I know, the market is pricing in a $140 move in the S&P for the week and is likely to close this Friday $70 up or down from it’s close from last Friday.
June 26, 2016 at 9:32 PM #799164CoronitaParticipant[quote=SK in CV]According to someone I know, the market is pricing in a $140 move in the S&P for the week and is likely to close this Friday $70 up or down from it’s close from last Friday.[/quote]
Interesting. I hope that’s the case….
June 26, 2016 at 10:03 PM #799167HatfieldParticipantI bought IVV on Friday and may buy some more tomorrow (Monday).
June 27, 2016 at 9:11 PM #799204ltsdddParticipantI bought a boat load of efa and ubs. also picked up some udow…..I am more or less done with the buying unless the market drops another 5-10%. Will sit on these for as long as it takes for me to make some profit.
June 28, 2016 at 7:20 AM #799206CoronitaParticipantHere’s what I bought. I’ll probably get screwed..
1 UDOW
2. T and VZ
3. GE
4. MAT mattel
5. VNQ vanguard REIT ETF
6. OIL
7. BAC Bank of America
8. AXP American Express
9. MO Phillip Morris
10. XLP Consumer Staples ETF
11. XLE Energy ETF
12. Moved money into Vanguard total stock market and vanguard index 500 funds…Most are dividend paying, some are beaten down sectors, some are pure gambles like BAC and AXP…lol…
Conveniently absent: tech stocks,lol
I’m think fed raising rates is probably off the table for the rest of the year. I’d like to think this will motivate people to go dividend hunting.
June 28, 2016 at 8:57 AM #799209livinincaliParticipantUDOW isn’t really designed to be a longer term holding. It’s better for short term trend trades because there’s some built in decay. For example UDOW peaked in May 2015, but the DOW itself recently hit a higher high in Apr 2016. UDOW failed to reach it’s previous peak. You’re probably better off with DIA or an index fund if you’re planing to hold for longer than a month or two.
June 28, 2016 at 9:07 AM #799210spdrunParticipantThe DOW did not surpass 2015 highs in 2016. Thankfully. UDOW may have built-in decay, but DOW didn’t set a record in 2016.
June 28, 2016 at 9:25 AM #799211CoronitaParticipant[quote=livinincali]UDOW isn’t really designed to be a longer term holding. It’s better for short term trend trades because there’s some built in decay. For example UDOW peaked in May 2015, but the DOW itself recently hit a higher high in Apr 2016. UDOW failed to reach it’s previous peak. You’re probably better off with DIA or an index fund if you’re planing to hold for longer than a month or two.[/quote]
None of the leveraged etfs are for long term holds….
June 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM #799212livinincaliParticipant[quote=spdrun]The DOW did not surpass 2015 highs in 2016. Thankfully. UDOW may have built-in decay, but DOW didn’t set a record in 2016.[/quote]
You’re right. Stockcharts.com has bad data for the DIA chart. Interesting.
June 29, 2016 at 6:58 AM #799221CoronitaParticipantPlatinum at 1002
Silver at 18.32
Gold at 1320June 29, 2016 at 7:44 AM #799222SK in CVParticipant[quote=flu]Platinum at 1002
Silver at 18.32
Gold at 1320[/quote]At the moment, one of those things is not like the other. Silver at its 52 week high that it hasn’t been close to before now. Gold just fell off its 52 week high that it wasn’t close to before the end of last weekend.
Pl not even close to its 52 week high, and has been higher, even substantially higher 4 times this year, and began the year much higher than it is now. It may return to being correlated though that’s unlikely. It’s not going to catch up.
None of them trade related to their utility value. They are fiats. And Platinum, not a very good one. And I suspect the non-correlative behavior of Pl will get worse, because of significantly greater supply deltas as compared to either gold or silver.
June 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM #799223CoronitaParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=flu]Platinum at 1002
Silver at 18.32
Gold at 1320[/quote]At the moment, one of those things is not like the other. Silver at its 52 week high that it hasn’t been close to before now. Gold just fell off its 52 week high that it wasn’t close to before the end of last weekend.
Pl not even close to its 52 week high, and has been higher, even substantially higher 4 times this year, and began the year much higher than it is now. It may return to being correlated though that’s unlikely. It’s not going to catch up.
None of them trade related to their utility value. They are fiats. And Platinum, not a very good one. And I suspect the non-correlative behavior of Pl will get worse, because of significantly greater supply deltas as compared to either gold or silver.[/quote]
Did not know that….I thought PI was more supply constrained than gold or silver since it’s only mined produced in a few countries, and because it’s also used in the automotive sector as an industrial metail for emission systems…Maybe I’m wrong about that.
June 29, 2016 at 9:44 AM #799226SK in CVParticipantWhat I’ve been reading lately is that, while the mined supply of platinum is still well below that of gold, the amount that is being mined annually/total supply is much larger than the same for gold. So it will continue to act as an alternative fiat to $$ and gold, but it will continue to degrade as compared to gold. The thing that’s stumping me is finding its actual utility value. Various sources are saying less than 2% of annual production is used for industrial purposes. Some are implying there are significant expected future uses. I suspect that won’t increase the value. I have a small amount. I’m considering dumping it.
June 29, 2016 at 12:55 PM #799233CoronitaParticipantI am out of UDOW and AMD and BAC
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.