- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
fredo4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM #327971January 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM #328080
davelj
ParticipantOK, I’m calling total bullshit on this fuckface. From the article:
“Mr. Lereah, who says he left NAR voluntarily, says he was pressured by executives to issue optimistic forecasts — then was left to shoulder the blame when things went sour. ‘I was there for seven years doing everything they wanted me to,’ he said, looking out his window to his tree-filled yard in this Washington suburb.”
This is the “I-just-did-what-I-was-told-to-do-but-didn’t-really-believe-it” argument.
But wait, further in the article it reveals that Mr. Lereah bought 6 condos – six! – between 2003 and 2006. So, one wistfully wonders… if he didn’t really think real estate was a good deal (and it was just his job to promote), then why in the hell was he doing so much “investing” in said real estate?
No no no no no… this guy is a clown. He believed his own bullshit and got caught wearing the dunce cap and now he’s trying to explain away the history of the egg on his face. I, for one, ain’t buyin’ his truckload of revisionist history.
January 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM #327903davelj
ParticipantOK, I’m calling total bullshit on this fuckface. From the article:
“Mr. Lereah, who says he left NAR voluntarily, says he was pressured by executives to issue optimistic forecasts — then was left to shoulder the blame when things went sour. ‘I was there for seven years doing everything they wanted me to,’ he said, looking out his window to his tree-filled yard in this Washington suburb.”
This is the “I-just-did-what-I-was-told-to-do-but-didn’t-really-believe-it” argument.
But wait, further in the article it reveals that Mr. Lereah bought 6 condos – six! – between 2003 and 2006. So, one wistfully wonders… if he didn’t really think real estate was a good deal (and it was just his job to promote), then why in the hell was he doing so much “investing” in said real estate?
No no no no no… this guy is a clown. He believed his own bullshit and got caught wearing the dunce cap and now he’s trying to explain away the history of the egg on his face. I, for one, ain’t buyin’ his truckload of revisionist history.
January 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM #327998davelj
ParticipantOK, I’m calling total bullshit on this fuckface. From the article:
“Mr. Lereah, who says he left NAR voluntarily, says he was pressured by executives to issue optimistic forecasts — then was left to shoulder the blame when things went sour. ‘I was there for seven years doing everything they wanted me to,’ he said, looking out his window to his tree-filled yard in this Washington suburb.”
This is the “I-just-did-what-I-was-told-to-do-but-didn’t-really-believe-it” argument.
But wait, further in the article it reveals that Mr. Lereah bought 6 condos – six! – between 2003 and 2006. So, one wistfully wonders… if he didn’t really think real estate was a good deal (and it was just his job to promote), then why in the hell was he doing so much “investing” in said real estate?
No no no no no… this guy is a clown. He believed his own bullshit and got caught wearing the dunce cap and now he’s trying to explain away the history of the egg on his face. I, for one, ain’t buyin’ his truckload of revisionist history.
January 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM #327567davelj
ParticipantOK, I’m calling total bullshit on this fuckface. From the article:
“Mr. Lereah, who says he left NAR voluntarily, says he was pressured by executives to issue optimistic forecasts — then was left to shoulder the blame when things went sour. ‘I was there for seven years doing everything they wanted me to,’ he said, looking out his window to his tree-filled yard in this Washington suburb.”
This is the “I-just-did-what-I-was-told-to-do-but-didn’t-really-believe-it” argument.
But wait, further in the article it reveals that Mr. Lereah bought 6 condos – six! – between 2003 and 2006. So, one wistfully wonders… if he didn’t really think real estate was a good deal (and it was just his job to promote), then why in the hell was he doing so much “investing” in said real estate?
No no no no no… this guy is a clown. He believed his own bullshit and got caught wearing the dunce cap and now he’s trying to explain away the history of the egg on his face. I, for one, ain’t buyin’ his truckload of revisionist history.
January 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM #327976davelj
ParticipantOK, I’m calling total bullshit on this fuckface. From the article:
“Mr. Lereah, who says he left NAR voluntarily, says he was pressured by executives to issue optimistic forecasts — then was left to shoulder the blame when things went sour. ‘I was there for seven years doing everything they wanted me to,’ he said, looking out his window to his tree-filled yard in this Washington suburb.”
This is the “I-just-did-what-I-was-told-to-do-but-didn’t-really-believe-it” argument.
But wait, further in the article it reveals that Mr. Lereah bought 6 condos – six! – between 2003 and 2006. So, one wistfully wonders… if he didn’t really think real estate was a good deal (and it was just his job to promote), then why in the hell was he doing so much “investing” in said real estate?
No no no no no… this guy is a clown. He believed his own bullshit and got caught wearing the dunce cap and now he’s trying to explain away the history of the egg on his face. I, for one, ain’t buyin’ his truckload of revisionist history.
January 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM #328100Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDave: So what’s the alternative? Do you think he’s going to tell the truth? Do you think the NAR is going to? The continuing antics of Lawrence Yun show that the NAR is committed to spreading their propaganda as far and wide as they can.
They disavowed Lereah, but are continuing to pay Yun to perform the same service, albeit on something of a reduced scale.
How big are the dunce caps for Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Rubin et al going to be? Housing was simply one aspect of what will go down in history as the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on a society and it was done with the complete support of the US Government. While the focus of this blog is on housing and the housing bubble, the fact remains that none of what transpired would have been even remotely possible without the completely reckless monetary policy (and I hesitate to even use the word “policy” because it connotes some semblance of thought) of Alan Greenspan and the Fed.
What makes this even more outrageous are the two prime directives of the Fed: Protect the US dollar and the integrity of the system. Are you f**king kidding me? You couldn’t have done a worse job if you tried. Hell, maybe they did. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right. Maybe it isn’t lunacy or idiocy at work here, maybe it’s sheer f**king genius.
January 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM #328017Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDave: So what’s the alternative? Do you think he’s going to tell the truth? Do you think the NAR is going to? The continuing antics of Lawrence Yun show that the NAR is committed to spreading their propaganda as far and wide as they can.
They disavowed Lereah, but are continuing to pay Yun to perform the same service, albeit on something of a reduced scale.
How big are the dunce caps for Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Rubin et al going to be? Housing was simply one aspect of what will go down in history as the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on a society and it was done with the complete support of the US Government. While the focus of this blog is on housing and the housing bubble, the fact remains that none of what transpired would have been even remotely possible without the completely reckless monetary policy (and I hesitate to even use the word “policy” because it connotes some semblance of thought) of Alan Greenspan and the Fed.
What makes this even more outrageous are the two prime directives of the Fed: Protect the US dollar and the integrity of the system. Are you f**king kidding me? You couldn’t have done a worse job if you tried. Hell, maybe they did. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right. Maybe it isn’t lunacy or idiocy at work here, maybe it’s sheer f**king genius.
January 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM #327996Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDave: So what’s the alternative? Do you think he’s going to tell the truth? Do you think the NAR is going to? The continuing antics of Lawrence Yun show that the NAR is committed to spreading their propaganda as far and wide as they can.
They disavowed Lereah, but are continuing to pay Yun to perform the same service, albeit on something of a reduced scale.
How big are the dunce caps for Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Rubin et al going to be? Housing was simply one aspect of what will go down in history as the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on a society and it was done with the complete support of the US Government. While the focus of this blog is on housing and the housing bubble, the fact remains that none of what transpired would have been even remotely possible without the completely reckless monetary policy (and I hesitate to even use the word “policy” because it connotes some semblance of thought) of Alan Greenspan and the Fed.
What makes this even more outrageous are the two prime directives of the Fed: Protect the US dollar and the integrity of the system. Are you f**king kidding me? You couldn’t have done a worse job if you tried. Hell, maybe they did. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right. Maybe it isn’t lunacy or idiocy at work here, maybe it’s sheer f**king genius.
January 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM #327923Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDave: So what’s the alternative? Do you think he’s going to tell the truth? Do you think the NAR is going to? The continuing antics of Lawrence Yun show that the NAR is committed to spreading their propaganda as far and wide as they can.
They disavowed Lereah, but are continuing to pay Yun to perform the same service, albeit on something of a reduced scale.
How big are the dunce caps for Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Rubin et al going to be? Housing was simply one aspect of what will go down in history as the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on a society and it was done with the complete support of the US Government. While the focus of this blog is on housing and the housing bubble, the fact remains that none of what transpired would have been even remotely possible without the completely reckless monetary policy (and I hesitate to even use the word “policy” because it connotes some semblance of thought) of Alan Greenspan and the Fed.
What makes this even more outrageous are the two prime directives of the Fed: Protect the US dollar and the integrity of the system. Are you f**king kidding me? You couldn’t have done a worse job if you tried. Hell, maybe they did. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right. Maybe it isn’t lunacy or idiocy at work here, maybe it’s sheer f**king genius.
January 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM #327587Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDave: So what’s the alternative? Do you think he’s going to tell the truth? Do you think the NAR is going to? The continuing antics of Lawrence Yun show that the NAR is committed to spreading their propaganda as far and wide as they can.
They disavowed Lereah, but are continuing to pay Yun to perform the same service, albeit on something of a reduced scale.
How big are the dunce caps for Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Rubin et al going to be? Housing was simply one aspect of what will go down in history as the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on a society and it was done with the complete support of the US Government. While the focus of this blog is on housing and the housing bubble, the fact remains that none of what transpired would have been even remotely possible without the completely reckless monetary policy (and I hesitate to even use the word “policy” because it connotes some semblance of thought) of Alan Greenspan and the Fed.
What makes this even more outrageous are the two prime directives of the Fed: Protect the US dollar and the integrity of the system. Are you f**king kidding me? You couldn’t have done a worse job if you tried. Hell, maybe they did. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right. Maybe it isn’t lunacy or idiocy at work here, maybe it’s sheer f**king genius.
January 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM #327602AK
ParticipantHe traded his credibility for that “healthy six-figures” income.
Now used copies of his books sell for $0.32 on Amazon.com.
Sadly, when your reputation has become a “distressed asset,” you’re stuck with it for life.
January 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM #327937AK
ParticipantHe traded his credibility for that “healthy six-figures” income.
Now used copies of his books sell for $0.32 on Amazon.com.
Sadly, when your reputation has become a “distressed asset,” you’re stuck with it for life.
January 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM #328115AK
ParticipantHe traded his credibility for that “healthy six-figures” income.
Now used copies of his books sell for $0.32 on Amazon.com.
Sadly, when your reputation has become a “distressed asset,” you’re stuck with it for life.
January 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM #328011AK
ParticipantHe traded his credibility for that “healthy six-figures” income.
Now used copies of his books sell for $0.32 on Amazon.com.
Sadly, when your reputation has become a “distressed asset,” you’re stuck with it for life.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.