- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
fredo4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 12, 2009 at 3:25 PM #14813January 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM #327547
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt sounds like Dave and Larry will soon be meeting at Dunkin Donuts each morning pretending they have business meetings with each other.
January 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM #328060ParticipantIt sounds like Dave and Larry will soon be meeting at Dunkin Donuts each morning pretending they have business meetings with each other.
January 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM #327978ParticipantIt sounds like Dave and Larry will soon be meeting at Dunkin Donuts each morning pretending they have business meetings with each other.
January 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM #327956ParticipantIt sounds like Dave and Larry will soon be meeting at Dunkin Donuts each morning pretending they have business meetings with each other.
January 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM #327883ParticipantIt sounds like Dave and Larry will soon be meeting at Dunkin Donuts each morning pretending they have business meetings with each other.
January 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM #327983The OC Scam
ParticipantI like this part:
“He charges $495 annually for the newsletter, and currently has fewer than 50 paying subscribers — a number Mr. Lereah aims to increase to 1,500 by the end of this year.”
Wow what a optimistic!
January 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM #328065ParticipantI like this part:
“He charges $495 annually for the newsletter, and currently has fewer than 50 paying subscribers — a number Mr. Lereah aims to increase to 1,500 by the end of this year.”
Wow what a optimistic!
January 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM #327961ParticipantI like this part:
“He charges $495 annually for the newsletter, and currently has fewer than 50 paying subscribers — a number Mr. Lereah aims to increase to 1,500 by the end of this year.”
Wow what a optimistic!
January 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM #327888ParticipantI like this part:
“He charges $495 annually for the newsletter, and currently has fewer than 50 paying subscribers — a number Mr. Lereah aims to increase to 1,500 by the end of this year.”
Wow what a optimistic!
January 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM #327552ParticipantI like this part:
“He charges $495 annually for the newsletter, and currently has fewer than 50 paying subscribers — a number Mr. Lereah aims to increase to 1,500 by the end of this year.”
Wow what a optimistic!
January 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM #328075Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantWhat was truly ironic about the article and perhaps unintentionally so was the NAR’s attempts to distance themselves from Lereah after the market tanked.
They hired him (in the “healthy six figures”) to shill for them and he did so for YEARS. Then, suddenly things go south and their attitude is almost “we had no idea what he was up to for all that time”. Puh-leeze. How sad and especially with Lawrence Yun picking up right where Lereah left off.
OC: Do you think he fully discloses his past association with NAR to his subscribers? I would think that would nuke him right there, at least in terms of objectivity.
January 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM #327898ParticipantWhat was truly ironic about the article and perhaps unintentionally so was the NAR’s attempts to distance themselves from Lereah after the market tanked.
They hired him (in the “healthy six figures”) to shill for them and he did so for YEARS. Then, suddenly things go south and their attitude is almost “we had no idea what he was up to for all that time”. Puh-leeze. How sad and especially with Lawrence Yun picking up right where Lereah left off.
OC: Do you think he fully discloses his past association with NAR to his subscribers? I would think that would nuke him right there, at least in terms of objectivity.
January 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM #327562ParticipantWhat was truly ironic about the article and perhaps unintentionally so was the NAR’s attempts to distance themselves from Lereah after the market tanked.
They hired him (in the “healthy six figures”) to shill for them and he did so for YEARS. Then, suddenly things go south and their attitude is almost “we had no idea what he was up to for all that time”. Puh-leeze. How sad and especially with Lawrence Yun picking up right where Lereah left off.
OC: Do you think he fully discloses his past association with NAR to his subscribers? I would think that would nuke him right there, at least in terms of objectivity.
January 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM #327993ParticipantWhat was truly ironic about the article and perhaps unintentionally so was the NAR’s attempts to distance themselves from Lereah after the market tanked.
They hired him (in the “healthy six figures”) to shill for them and he did so for YEARS. Then, suddenly things go south and their attitude is almost “we had no idea what he was up to for all that time”. Puh-leeze. How sad and especially with Lawrence Yun picking up right where Lereah left off.
OC: Do you think he fully discloses his past association with NAR to his subscribers? I would think that would nuke him right there, at least in terms of objectivity.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.