- This topic has 205 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2011 at 7:53 PM #670003February 20, 2011 at 7:57 PM #668862
no_such_reality
ParticipantThere are still all sorts of programs for the working poor to own a home. You aren’t working poor if you’re buying a $400,000 home.
CAR, the best thing for the poor is the removal of the artificial inflation in the housing market of propped up money.
February 20, 2011 at 7:57 PM #668924no_such_reality
ParticipantThere are still all sorts of programs for the working poor to own a home. You aren’t working poor if you’re buying a $400,000 home.
CAR, the best thing for the poor is the removal of the artificial inflation in the housing market of propped up money.
February 20, 2011 at 7:57 PM #669531no_such_reality
ParticipantThere are still all sorts of programs for the working poor to own a home. You aren’t working poor if you’re buying a $400,000 home.
CAR, the best thing for the poor is the removal of the artificial inflation in the housing market of propped up money.
February 20, 2011 at 7:57 PM #669670no_such_reality
ParticipantThere are still all sorts of programs for the working poor to own a home. You aren’t working poor if you’re buying a $400,000 home.
CAR, the best thing for the poor is the removal of the artificial inflation in the housing market of propped up money.
February 20, 2011 at 7:57 PM #670013no_such_reality
ParticipantThere are still all sorts of programs for the working poor to own a home. You aren’t working poor if you’re buying a $400,000 home.
CAR, the best thing for the poor is the removal of the artificial inflation in the housing market of propped up money.
February 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM #668872paramount
ParticipantThere is so much arrogance and self-righteousness on this board it’s unreal (and very reflective of the collective character of coastal San Diego – most of whom aren’t even from San Diego); hopefully one benefit that would arise from these discriminatory standards would be less realtors and mortgage brokers.
Folks, the standards this article discusses is nothing less than gentrification.
February 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM #668934paramount
ParticipantThere is so much arrogance and self-righteousness on this board it’s unreal (and very reflective of the collective character of coastal San Diego – most of whom aren’t even from San Diego); hopefully one benefit that would arise from these discriminatory standards would be less realtors and mortgage brokers.
Folks, the standards this article discusses is nothing less than gentrification.
February 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM #669541paramount
ParticipantThere is so much arrogance and self-righteousness on this board it’s unreal (and very reflective of the collective character of coastal San Diego – most of whom aren’t even from San Diego); hopefully one benefit that would arise from these discriminatory standards would be less realtors and mortgage brokers.
Folks, the standards this article discusses is nothing less than gentrification.
February 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM #669680paramount
ParticipantThere is so much arrogance and self-righteousness on this board it’s unreal (and very reflective of the collective character of coastal San Diego – most of whom aren’t even from San Diego); hopefully one benefit that would arise from these discriminatory standards would be less realtors and mortgage brokers.
Folks, the standards this article discusses is nothing less than gentrification.
February 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM #670023paramount
ParticipantThere is so much arrogance and self-righteousness on this board it’s unreal (and very reflective of the collective character of coastal San Diego – most of whom aren’t even from San Diego); hopefully one benefit that would arise from these discriminatory standards would be less realtors and mortgage brokers.
Folks, the standards this article discusses is nothing less than gentrification.
February 20, 2011 at 8:47 PM #668892CA renter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]I cannot think of a better way to achieve a stronger overall market. This of course will add to imbalances with regards to investor owned properties and such. However in all honesty, (and CAR I know you will not like this) owning a home is not a right. We allo know the pendulum was going to need to swing hard in the other direction and if we had standards like this to begin with, it would have been helpful. Reducing the FHA footprint is a great idea. Hopefully we will see prices adjust but it will not happen overnight. The rubber band does not just snapback immediately.[/quote]
Of course, I DO agree with the bolded part of your statement.
Outside of a very limited public housing program, like I’ve mentioned above (so small, you can hardly see it), we are in 100% agreement about the rest of the market.
February 20, 2011 at 8:47 PM #668954CA renter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]I cannot think of a better way to achieve a stronger overall market. This of course will add to imbalances with regards to investor owned properties and such. However in all honesty, (and CAR I know you will not like this) owning a home is not a right. We allo know the pendulum was going to need to swing hard in the other direction and if we had standards like this to begin with, it would have been helpful. Reducing the FHA footprint is a great idea. Hopefully we will see prices adjust but it will not happen overnight. The rubber band does not just snapback immediately.[/quote]
Of course, I DO agree with the bolded part of your statement.
Outside of a very limited public housing program, like I’ve mentioned above (so small, you can hardly see it), we are in 100% agreement about the rest of the market.
February 20, 2011 at 8:47 PM #669561CA renter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]I cannot think of a better way to achieve a stronger overall market. This of course will add to imbalances with regards to investor owned properties and such. However in all honesty, (and CAR I know you will not like this) owning a home is not a right. We allo know the pendulum was going to need to swing hard in the other direction and if we had standards like this to begin with, it would have been helpful. Reducing the FHA footprint is a great idea. Hopefully we will see prices adjust but it will not happen overnight. The rubber band does not just snapback immediately.[/quote]
Of course, I DO agree with the bolded part of your statement.
Outside of a very limited public housing program, like I’ve mentioned above (so small, you can hardly see it), we are in 100% agreement about the rest of the market.
February 20, 2011 at 8:47 PM #669700CA renter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]I cannot think of a better way to achieve a stronger overall market. This of course will add to imbalances with regards to investor owned properties and such. However in all honesty, (and CAR I know you will not like this) owning a home is not a right. We allo know the pendulum was going to need to swing hard in the other direction and if we had standards like this to begin with, it would have been helpful. Reducing the FHA footprint is a great idea. Hopefully we will see prices adjust but it will not happen overnight. The rubber band does not just snapback immediately.[/quote]
Of course, I DO agree with the bolded part of your statement.
Outside of a very limited public housing program, like I’ve mentioned above (so small, you can hardly see it), we are in 100% agreement about the rest of the market.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.