- This topic has 205 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2011 at 1:55 PM #670318February 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM #669207
NotCranky
ParticipantCAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.
February 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM #669269ParticipantCAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.
February 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM #669876ParticipantCAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.
February 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM #670015ParticipantCAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.
February 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM #670358ParticipantCAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.
February 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM #669312CA renter
Participant[quote=Rustico]CAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.[/quote]
I’m a economic socialist (and a social libertarian), not a communist. 😉
I support private property rights, but oppose hoarding, monopolies, and market manipulation — particularly because these things are designed to enrich the few (who are not necessarily producers, but simply have the right connections/power) at the expense of the many.
As such, I acknowledge the fact that people with different skills and work ethics will perform at different levels. It’s perfectly logical that people will earn different wages, and be entitled to different levels of luxury/living. It’s the size of the disparity that causes me concern. When it gets too large, social unrest is the inevitable result. That’s what we are witnessing right now around the world, and it’s coming here soon, IMHO.
February 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM #669374Participant[quote=Rustico]CAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.[/quote]
I’m a economic socialist (and a social libertarian), not a communist. 😉
I support private property rights, but oppose hoarding, monopolies, and market manipulation — particularly because these things are designed to enrich the few (who are not necessarily producers, but simply have the right connections/power) at the expense of the many.
As such, I acknowledge the fact that people with different skills and work ethics will perform at different levels. It’s perfectly logical that people will earn different wages, and be entitled to different levels of luxury/living. It’s the size of the disparity that causes me concern. When it gets too large, social unrest is the inevitable result. That’s what we are witnessing right now around the world, and it’s coming here soon, IMHO.
February 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM #669981Participant[quote=Rustico]CAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.[/quote]
I’m a economic socialist (and a social libertarian), not a communist. 😉
I support private property rights, but oppose hoarding, monopolies, and market manipulation — particularly because these things are designed to enrich the few (who are not necessarily producers, but simply have the right connections/power) at the expense of the many.
As such, I acknowledge the fact that people with different skills and work ethics will perform at different levels. It’s perfectly logical that people will earn different wages, and be entitled to different levels of luxury/living. It’s the size of the disparity that causes me concern. When it gets too large, social unrest is the inevitable result. That’s what we are witnessing right now around the world, and it’s coming here soon, IMHO.
February 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM #670120Participant[quote=Rustico]CAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.[/quote]
I’m a economic socialist (and a social libertarian), not a communist. 😉
I support private property rights, but oppose hoarding, monopolies, and market manipulation — particularly because these things are designed to enrich the few (who are not necessarily producers, but simply have the right connections/power) at the expense of the many.
As such, I acknowledge the fact that people with different skills and work ethics will perform at different levels. It’s perfectly logical that people will earn different wages, and be entitled to different levels of luxury/living. It’s the size of the disparity that causes me concern. When it gets too large, social unrest is the inevitable result. That’s what we are witnessing right now around the world, and it’s coming here soon, IMHO.
February 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM #670463Participant[quote=Rustico]CAR, When I am thinking communist, like you are, I have always thought we should develop cities so that the haves and have-nots would live on the same streets or buildings…Welcome to Carmel Logan.[/quote]
I’m a economic socialist (and a social libertarian), not a communist. 😉
I support private property rights, but oppose hoarding, monopolies, and market manipulation — particularly because these things are designed to enrich the few (who are not necessarily producers, but simply have the right connections/power) at the expense of the many.
As such, I acknowledge the fact that people with different skills and work ethics will perform at different levels. It’s perfectly logical that people will earn different wages, and be entitled to different levels of luxury/living. It’s the size of the disparity that causes me concern. When it gets too large, social unrest is the inevitable result. That’s what we are witnessing right now around the world, and it’s coming here soon, IMHO.
February 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM #669317moneymaker
ParticipantWouldn’t it be nice if when our troops come home they could buy a home that was affordable in the 50’s, instead of built in the 50’s.
February 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM #669379ParticipantWouldn’t it be nice if when our troops come home they could buy a home that was affordable in the 50’s, instead of built in the 50’s.
February 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM #669986ParticipantWouldn’t it be nice if when our troops come home they could buy a home that was affordable in the 50’s, instead of built in the 50’s.
February 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM #670125ParticipantWouldn’t it be nice if when our troops come home they could buy a home that was affordable in the 50’s, instead of built in the 50’s.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.