- This topic has 240 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
CDMA ENG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 21, 2010 at 6:01 AM #17607June 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM #568090
jpinpb
ParticipantWhile stopping short of predicting a full-blown double dip in the broad economy, Whitney said one is certainly in store for the housing market.
“People doubt there’s a double-dip in housing,” she said. “It’s amazing.”
As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.
June 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM #568188jpinpb
ParticipantWhile stopping short of predicting a full-blown double dip in the broad economy, Whitney said one is certainly in store for the housing market.
“People doubt there’s a double-dip in housing,” she said. “It’s amazing.”
As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.
June 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM #568691jpinpb
ParticipantWhile stopping short of predicting a full-blown double dip in the broad economy, Whitney said one is certainly in store for the housing market.
“People doubt there’s a double-dip in housing,” she said. “It’s amazing.”
As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.
June 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM #568795jpinpb
ParticipantWhile stopping short of predicting a full-blown double dip in the broad economy, Whitney said one is certainly in store for the housing market.
“People doubt there’s a double-dip in housing,” she said. “It’s amazing.”
As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.
June 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM #569081jpinpb
ParticipantWhile stopping short of predicting a full-blown double dip in the broad economy, Whitney said one is certainly in store for the housing market.
“People doubt there’s a double-dip in housing,” she said. “It’s amazing.”
As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.
June 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM #568095eavesdropper
ParticipantDon’t always agree with her, but leaning in the direction of her observations and predictions here. The business sector, the government officials, and the population in general just keep looking for signs that the economy has reversed course, and they’re basing those hopes on the model that prevailed in the late 90s and the early and mid-oughts. I rarely see anyone offering comprehensive analysis of the dire situation we’re in, and taking a broad-based look at all of the contributing factors. People are seizing on what might be interpreted as a positive sign in one sector, and basing predictions of a full and permanent recovery on it.
The economy tanked because there were problems with the basic business model being utilized by the financial institutions. Continuing to use a broken model, while blaming the meltdown on any one of a variety of contributing factors (depending on your political outlook), will not result in recovery. It will almost assuredly delay it, and make it a more painful and difficult process.
June 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM #568193eavesdropper
ParticipantDon’t always agree with her, but leaning in the direction of her observations and predictions here. The business sector, the government officials, and the population in general just keep looking for signs that the economy has reversed course, and they’re basing those hopes on the model that prevailed in the late 90s and the early and mid-oughts. I rarely see anyone offering comprehensive analysis of the dire situation we’re in, and taking a broad-based look at all of the contributing factors. People are seizing on what might be interpreted as a positive sign in one sector, and basing predictions of a full and permanent recovery on it.
The economy tanked because there were problems with the basic business model being utilized by the financial institutions. Continuing to use a broken model, while blaming the meltdown on any one of a variety of contributing factors (depending on your political outlook), will not result in recovery. It will almost assuredly delay it, and make it a more painful and difficult process.
June 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM #568696eavesdropper
ParticipantDon’t always agree with her, but leaning in the direction of her observations and predictions here. The business sector, the government officials, and the population in general just keep looking for signs that the economy has reversed course, and they’re basing those hopes on the model that prevailed in the late 90s and the early and mid-oughts. I rarely see anyone offering comprehensive analysis of the dire situation we’re in, and taking a broad-based look at all of the contributing factors. People are seizing on what might be interpreted as a positive sign in one sector, and basing predictions of a full and permanent recovery on it.
The economy tanked because there were problems with the basic business model being utilized by the financial institutions. Continuing to use a broken model, while blaming the meltdown on any one of a variety of contributing factors (depending on your political outlook), will not result in recovery. It will almost assuredly delay it, and make it a more painful and difficult process.
June 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM #568800eavesdropper
ParticipantDon’t always agree with her, but leaning in the direction of her observations and predictions here. The business sector, the government officials, and the population in general just keep looking for signs that the economy has reversed course, and they’re basing those hopes on the model that prevailed in the late 90s and the early and mid-oughts. I rarely see anyone offering comprehensive analysis of the dire situation we’re in, and taking a broad-based look at all of the contributing factors. People are seizing on what might be interpreted as a positive sign in one sector, and basing predictions of a full and permanent recovery on it.
The economy tanked because there were problems with the basic business model being utilized by the financial institutions. Continuing to use a broken model, while blaming the meltdown on any one of a variety of contributing factors (depending on your political outlook), will not result in recovery. It will almost assuredly delay it, and make it a more painful and difficult process.
June 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM #569086eavesdropper
ParticipantDon’t always agree with her, but leaning in the direction of her observations and predictions here. The business sector, the government officials, and the population in general just keep looking for signs that the economy has reversed course, and they’re basing those hopes on the model that prevailed in the late 90s and the early and mid-oughts. I rarely see anyone offering comprehensive analysis of the dire situation we’re in, and taking a broad-based look at all of the contributing factors. People are seizing on what might be interpreted as a positive sign in one sector, and basing predictions of a full and permanent recovery on it.
The economy tanked because there were problems with the basic business model being utilized by the financial institutions. Continuing to use a broken model, while blaming the meltdown on any one of a variety of contributing factors (depending on your political outlook), will not result in recovery. It will almost assuredly delay it, and make it a more painful and difficult process.
June 21, 2010 at 8:27 AM #568105eavesdropper
Participant[quote=jpinpb] As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.[/quote]
That’s a salient observation, jp. Even people who aren’t being affected, either by being in a comfortable financial position, or having purchased a house at a greatly reduced price courtesy of the meltdown, are going to find significant reductions in their disposable income levels. Property tax rates are rising rapidly, as states and municipalities try to compensate for the loss in Federal aid, and reductions in their own tax revenues resulting from foreclosures and lowered property values in their areas.
A side observation: I can’t imagine that the banks are going to allow this “free living” situation to go on much longer without imposing harsh penalties on their mortgagors. Any thoughts on this?
June 21, 2010 at 8:27 AM #568203eavesdropper
Participant[quote=jpinpb] As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.[/quote]
That’s a salient observation, jp. Even people who aren’t being affected, either by being in a comfortable financial position, or having purchased a house at a greatly reduced price courtesy of the meltdown, are going to find significant reductions in their disposable income levels. Property tax rates are rising rapidly, as states and municipalities try to compensate for the loss in Federal aid, and reductions in their own tax revenues resulting from foreclosures and lowered property values in their areas.
A side observation: I can’t imagine that the banks are going to allow this “free living” situation to go on much longer without imposing harsh penalties on their mortgagors. Any thoughts on this?
June 21, 2010 at 8:27 AM #568706eavesdropper
Participant[quote=jpinpb] As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.[/quote]
That’s a salient observation, jp. Even people who aren’t being affected, either by being in a comfortable financial position, or having purchased a house at a greatly reduced price courtesy of the meltdown, are going to find significant reductions in their disposable income levels. Property tax rates are rising rapidly, as states and municipalities try to compensate for the loss in Federal aid, and reductions in their own tax revenues resulting from foreclosures and lowered property values in their areas.
A side observation: I can’t imagine that the banks are going to allow this “free living” situation to go on much longer without imposing harsh penalties on their mortgagors. Any thoughts on this?
June 21, 2010 at 8:27 AM #568810eavesdropper
Participant[quote=jpinpb] As far as consumer spending, we’ve discussed this. One of the greatest expenses is housing. If that is factored out, you have extra money, discretionary spending. That is one of the biggest reasons our economy is doing as well as it is.
Should be interesting to see what’s going to happen when people are forced out of their free-living situation and have to start digging in their pockets for housing again.
Even if they manage to get loan mods, that’ll mean less money eating out and/or shopping.[/quote]
That’s a salient observation, jp. Even people who aren’t being affected, either by being in a comfortable financial position, or having purchased a house at a greatly reduced price courtesy of the meltdown, are going to find significant reductions in their disposable income levels. Property tax rates are rising rapidly, as states and municipalities try to compensate for the loss in Federal aid, and reductions in their own tax revenues resulting from foreclosures and lowered property values in their areas.
A side observation: I can’t imagine that the banks are going to allow this “free living” situation to go on much longer without imposing harsh penalties on their mortgagors. Any thoughts on this?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.