- This topic has 50 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
mgubnyc1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 27, 2007 at 9:17 AM #11000
-
November 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM #103871
mgubnyc1
ParticipantOuch! Yep, but the truth is most people taking 400k mortgages can’t even afford them anyway. A 400K 30year fixed at 6% mortgage and 12K property tax’s cost like 3500 a month and that’s just your house payment, so many of these people have BMW car payments, RV payments line of credit and credit card payments, why give someone a 400K mortgage they can’t afford.
Someone deserving of a 400K mortgage should have a minimum income of 225K Gross to qualify. (IMO)-
November 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM #103876
SD Realtor
ParticipantThis is very good news.
SD Realtor
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM #103961
SD Realtor
ParticipantThis is very good news.
SD Realtor
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM #103973
SD Realtor
ParticipantThis is very good news.
SD Realtor
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM #104000
SD Realtor
ParticipantThis is very good news.
SD Realtor
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:11 AM #104022
SD Realtor
ParticipantThis is very good news.
SD Realtor
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM #103912
markzuber
ParticipantProperty tax cost on 400K should be about 4.5K or about $367 monthly. 30 Year Fixed Mortgage on 400k should be about $2,400 monthly. So, the total house payment will be $367 + $2,400 = $2,767.
Did I miss something here?
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:24 PM #103930
mgubnyc1
ParticipantYes! I’m assuming the purchase price to be somewhere around 550K to 650K with a 20% to 25% deposit!
Who is going to give 400K mortgages on a house that is only worth 400K???? -
November 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM #103936
Raybyrnes
ParticipantMost lenders will still provide up to 97% financing if you are going through the Federal program because of the fact that the loans are government guaranteed. There are down payment assistance programs that can cover the additional 3% so availability to money is still there. You just have to look a little bit harder for it.
There are also state run programs. http://www.calhfa.ca.gov
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:41 PM #103950
mgubnyc1
ParticipantMaybe so, there are suckers still out there, but you won’t be anywhere near a 6% rate. Further to this, anyone taking a 400K loan today on a house that will be worth 300K in a year from now is an idiot and the dumb ass mortgage company that issues the loan should be shut down.
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:41 PM #104037
mgubnyc1
ParticipantMaybe so, there are suckers still out there, but you won’t be anywhere near a 6% rate. Further to this, anyone taking a 400K loan today on a house that will be worth 300K in a year from now is an idiot and the dumb ass mortgage company that issues the loan should be shut down.
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:41 PM #104048
mgubnyc1
ParticipantMaybe so, there are suckers still out there, but you won’t be anywhere near a 6% rate. Further to this, anyone taking a 400K loan today on a house that will be worth 300K in a year from now is an idiot and the dumb ass mortgage company that issues the loan should be shut down.
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:41 PM #104074
mgubnyc1
ParticipantMaybe so, there are suckers still out there, but you won’t be anywhere near a 6% rate. Further to this, anyone taking a 400K loan today on a house that will be worth 300K in a year from now is an idiot and the dumb ass mortgage company that issues the loan should be shut down.
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:41 PM #104097
mgubnyc1
ParticipantMaybe so, there are suckers still out there, but you won’t be anywhere near a 6% rate. Further to this, anyone taking a 400K loan today on a house that will be worth 300K in a year from now is an idiot and the dumb ass mortgage company that issues the loan should be shut down.
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM #104021
Raybyrnes
ParticipantMost lenders will still provide up to 97% financing if you are going through the Federal program because of the fact that the loans are government guaranteed. There are down payment assistance programs that can cover the additional 3% so availability to money is still there. You just have to look a little bit harder for it.
There are also state run programs. http://www.calhfa.ca.gov
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM #104033
Raybyrnes
ParticipantMost lenders will still provide up to 97% financing if you are going through the Federal program because of the fact that the loans are government guaranteed. There are down payment assistance programs that can cover the additional 3% so availability to money is still there. You just have to look a little bit harder for it.
There are also state run programs. http://www.calhfa.ca.gov
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM #104060
Raybyrnes
ParticipantMost lenders will still provide up to 97% financing if you are going through the Federal program because of the fact that the loans are government guaranteed. There are down payment assistance programs that can cover the additional 3% so availability to money is still there. You just have to look a little bit harder for it.
There are also state run programs. http://www.calhfa.ca.gov
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:31 PM #104082
Raybyrnes
ParticipantMost lenders will still provide up to 97% financing if you are going through the Federal program because of the fact that the loans are government guaranteed. There are down payment assistance programs that can cover the additional 3% so availability to money is still there. You just have to look a little bit harder for it.
There are also state run programs. http://www.calhfa.ca.gov
-
November 27, 2007 at 1:24 PM #104016
mgubnyc1
ParticipantYes! I’m assuming the purchase price to be somewhere around 550K to 650K with a 20% to 25% deposit!
Who is going to give 400K mortgages on a house that is only worth 400K???? -
November 27, 2007 at 1:24 PM #104028
mgubnyc1
ParticipantYes! I’m assuming the purchase price to be somewhere around 550K to 650K with a 20% to 25% deposit!
Who is going to give 400K mortgages on a house that is only worth 400K???? -
November 27, 2007 at 1:24 PM #104055
mgubnyc1
ParticipantYes! I’m assuming the purchase price to be somewhere around 550K to 650K with a 20% to 25% deposit!
Who is going to give 400K mortgages on a house that is only worth 400K???? -
November 27, 2007 at 1:24 PM #104077
mgubnyc1
ParticipantYes! I’m assuming the purchase price to be somewhere around 550K to 650K with a 20% to 25% deposit!
Who is going to give 400K mortgages on a house that is only worth 400K????
-
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM #103996
markzuber
ParticipantProperty tax cost on 400K should be about 4.5K or about $367 monthly. 30 Year Fixed Mortgage on 400k should be about $2,400 monthly. So, the total house payment will be $367 + $2,400 = $2,767.
Did I miss something here?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM #104008
markzuber
ParticipantProperty tax cost on 400K should be about 4.5K or about $367 monthly. 30 Year Fixed Mortgage on 400k should be about $2,400 monthly. So, the total house payment will be $367 + $2,400 = $2,767.
Did I miss something here?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM #104035
markzuber
ParticipantProperty tax cost on 400K should be about 4.5K or about $367 monthly. 30 Year Fixed Mortgage on 400k should be about $2,400 monthly. So, the total house payment will be $367 + $2,400 = $2,767.
Did I miss something here?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM #104057
markzuber
ParticipantProperty tax cost on 400K should be about 4.5K or about $367 monthly. 30 Year Fixed Mortgage on 400k should be about $2,400 monthly. So, the total house payment will be $367 + $2,400 = $2,767.
Did I miss something here?
-
-
November 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM #103956
mgubnyc1
ParticipantOuch! Yep, but the truth is most people taking 400k mortgages can’t even afford them anyway. A 400K 30year fixed at 6% mortgage and 12K property tax’s cost like 3500 a month and that’s just your house payment, so many of these people have BMW car payments, RV payments line of credit and credit card payments, why give someone a 400K mortgage they can’t afford.
Someone deserving of a 400K mortgage should have a minimum income of 225K Gross to qualify. (IMO) -
November 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM #103968
mgubnyc1
ParticipantOuch! Yep, but the truth is most people taking 400k mortgages can’t even afford them anyway. A 400K 30year fixed at 6% mortgage and 12K property tax’s cost like 3500 a month and that’s just your house payment, so many of these people have BMW car payments, RV payments line of credit and credit card payments, why give someone a 400K mortgage they can’t afford.
Someone deserving of a 400K mortgage should have a minimum income of 225K Gross to qualify. (IMO) -
November 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM #103995
mgubnyc1
ParticipantOuch! Yep, but the truth is most people taking 400k mortgages can’t even afford them anyway. A 400K 30year fixed at 6% mortgage and 12K property tax’s cost like 3500 a month and that’s just your house payment, so many of these people have BMW car payments, RV payments line of credit and credit card payments, why give someone a 400K mortgage they can’t afford.
Someone deserving of a 400K mortgage should have a minimum income of 225K Gross to qualify. (IMO) -
November 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM #104017
mgubnyc1
ParticipantOuch! Yep, but the truth is most people taking 400k mortgages can’t even afford them anyway. A 400K 30year fixed at 6% mortgage and 12K property tax’s cost like 3500 a month and that’s just your house payment, so many of these people have BMW car payments, RV payments line of credit and credit card payments, why give someone a 400K mortgage they can’t afford.
Someone deserving of a 400K mortgage should have a minimum income of 225K Gross to qualify. (IMO) -
November 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM #103881
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
I’m missing somthing. The way I understand the program, the limits should have adjusted downward to reflect the declining costs. By leaving the limits unchanged they are actually helping more borrowers who are potentially on the edge. Additonally this expands the pool of potential buyers. I would think that this slows the housing correction rather than accelerating it.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM #103886
mgubnyc1
ParticipantIts going to take much more then this to slow this housing correction, were just picking up momentum, 2007 has has already hit 10% declines in many parts of CA,AZ,NV,IL and FL
IMO you will see another 10% drop in these states in the 1st half of 2008.
Then maybe start to slow.-
November 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM #103896
Tone
ParticipantCan Congress, in their zeal to prop up housing, over-ride the federal regulator and force the FHA to increase the limit?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:45 AM #103907
mgubnyc1
ParticipantThat won’t matter, bottom line is unless you have the ability to repay you won’t get a loan.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:45 AM #103991
mgubnyc1
ParticipantThat won’t matter, bottom line is unless you have the ability to repay you won’t get a loan.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:45 AM #104003
mgubnyc1
ParticipantThat won’t matter, bottom line is unless you have the ability to repay you won’t get a loan.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:45 AM #104030
mgubnyc1
ParticipantThat won’t matter, bottom line is unless you have the ability to repay you won’t get a loan.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:45 AM #104052
mgubnyc1
ParticipantThat won’t matter, bottom line is unless you have the ability to repay you won’t get a loan.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM #103981
Tone
ParticipantCan Congress, in their zeal to prop up housing, over-ride the federal regulator and force the FHA to increase the limit?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM #103993
Tone
ParticipantCan Congress, in their zeal to prop up housing, over-ride the federal regulator and force the FHA to increase the limit?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM #104020
Tone
ParticipantCan Congress, in their zeal to prop up housing, over-ride the federal regulator and force the FHA to increase the limit?
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:39 AM #104042
Tone
ParticipantCan Congress, in their zeal to prop up housing, over-ride the federal regulator and force the FHA to increase the limit?
-
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM #103970
mgubnyc1
ParticipantIts going to take much more then this to slow this housing correction, were just picking up momentum, 2007 has has already hit 10% declines in many parts of CA,AZ,NV,IL and FL
IMO you will see another 10% drop in these states in the 1st half of 2008.
Then maybe start to slow. -
November 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM #103983
mgubnyc1
ParticipantIts going to take much more then this to slow this housing correction, were just picking up momentum, 2007 has has already hit 10% declines in many parts of CA,AZ,NV,IL and FL
IMO you will see another 10% drop in these states in the 1st half of 2008.
Then maybe start to slow. -
November 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM #104010
mgubnyc1
ParticipantIts going to take much more then this to slow this housing correction, were just picking up momentum, 2007 has has already hit 10% declines in many parts of CA,AZ,NV,IL and FL
IMO you will see another 10% drop in these states in the 1st half of 2008.
Then maybe start to slow. -
November 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM #104032
mgubnyc1
ParticipantIts going to take much more then this to slow this housing correction, were just picking up momentum, 2007 has has already hit 10% declines in many parts of CA,AZ,NV,IL and FL
IMO you will see another 10% drop in these states in the 1st half of 2008.
Then maybe start to slow.
-
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM #103965
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
I’m missing somthing. The way I understand the program, the limits should have adjusted downward to reflect the declining costs. By leaving the limits unchanged they are actually helping more borrowers who are potentially on the edge. Additonally this expands the pool of potential buyers. I would think that this slows the housing correction rather than accelerating it.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM #103978
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
I’m missing somthing. The way I understand the program, the limits should have adjusted downward to reflect the declining costs. By leaving the limits unchanged they are actually helping more borrowers who are potentially on the edge. Additonally this expands the pool of potential buyers. I would think that this slows the housing correction rather than accelerating it.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM #104005
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
I’m missing somthing. The way I understand the program, the limits should have adjusted downward to reflect the declining costs. By leaving the limits unchanged they are actually helping more borrowers who are potentially on the edge. Additonally this expands the pool of potential buyers. I would think that this slows the housing correction rather than accelerating it.
-
November 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM #104027
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
I’m missing somthing. The way I understand the program, the limits should have adjusted downward to reflect the declining costs. By leaving the limits unchanged they are actually helping more borrowers who are potentially on the edge. Additonally this expands the pool of potential buyers. I would think that this slows the housing correction rather than accelerating it.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.