Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Forbes: Where Americans Are Moving

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 46 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 16, 2010 at 12:10 PM #566929
    briansd1
    Guest

    [quote=afx114]This is awesome… check out the retirement exodus from Manhattan to Florida.[/quote]

    I see more San Diegans moving to New York than vice versa.

    Seems like younger folks moving to NY and older folks moving to SD.

    June 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM #566006
    Ash Housewares
    Participant

    Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends

    June 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM #566104
    Ash Housewares
    Participant

    Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends

    June 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM #566612
    Ash Housewares
    Participant

    Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends

    June 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM #566721
    Ash Housewares
    Participant

    Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends

    June 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM #567009
    Ash Housewares
    Participant

    Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends

    June 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM #566011
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    Luv the map. When I clicked on smaller midwestern counties I was familiar with, the in and out migration are only to other counties less than 100 mi. away. Also, some states appear to have little to no out-migration. It’s what I always believed.

    SD Co. appears VERY red. I don’t think this bodes too well for us. Too bad the map doesn’t include Mexico. This would be very telling.

    Thanks, Edna. Very fun!

    June 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM #566109
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    Luv the map. When I clicked on smaller midwestern counties I was familiar with, the in and out migration are only to other counties less than 100 mi. away. Also, some states appear to have little to no out-migration. It’s what I always believed.

    SD Co. appears VERY red. I don’t think this bodes too well for us. Too bad the map doesn’t include Mexico. This would be very telling.

    Thanks, Edna. Very fun!

    June 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM #566617
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    Luv the map. When I clicked on smaller midwestern counties I was familiar with, the in and out migration are only to other counties less than 100 mi. away. Also, some states appear to have little to no out-migration. It’s what I always believed.

    SD Co. appears VERY red. I don’t think this bodes too well for us. Too bad the map doesn’t include Mexico. This would be very telling.

    Thanks, Edna. Very fun!

    June 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM #566726
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    Luv the map. When I clicked on smaller midwestern counties I was familiar with, the in and out migration are only to other counties less than 100 mi. away. Also, some states appear to have little to no out-migration. It’s what I always believed.

    SD Co. appears VERY red. I don’t think this bodes too well for us. Too bad the map doesn’t include Mexico. This would be very telling.

    Thanks, Edna. Very fun!

    June 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM #567014
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    Luv the map. When I clicked on smaller midwestern counties I was familiar with, the in and out migration are only to other counties less than 100 mi. away. Also, some states appear to have little to no out-migration. It’s what I always believed.

    SD Co. appears VERY red. I don’t think this bodes too well for us. Too bad the map doesn’t include Mexico. This would be very telling.

    Thanks, Edna. Very fun!

    June 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM #566116
    poorgradstudent
    Participant

    [quote=Ash Housewares]Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends[/quote]
    Which has actually made Seattle much less desirable than it was 2 years ago. My brother fled Seattle in 2009 due to a takeover by yuppies and hipsters.

    Interestingly, San Fran also had a huge influx despite high cost of living.

    June 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM #566214
    poorgradstudent
    Participant

    [quote=Ash Housewares]Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends[/quote]
    Which has actually made Seattle much less desirable than it was 2 years ago. My brother fled Seattle in 2009 due to a takeover by yuppies and hipsters.

    Interestingly, San Fran also had a huge influx despite high cost of living.

    June 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM #566722
    poorgradstudent
    Participant

    [quote=Ash Housewares]Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends[/quote]
    Which has actually made Seattle much less desirable than it was 2 years ago. My brother fled Seattle in 2009 due to a takeover by yuppies and hipsters.

    Interestingly, San Fran also had a huge influx despite high cost of living.

    June 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM #566831
    poorgradstudent
    Participant

    [quote=Ash Housewares]Looks like Houston and Seattle having two of the highest proportions of incomers. Pretty consistent with overall economic trends[/quote]
    Which has actually made Seattle much less desirable than it was 2 years ago. My brother fled Seattle in 2009 due to a takeover by yuppies and hipsters.

    Interestingly, San Fran also had a huge influx despite high cost of living.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 46 total)
1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.