Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Estates at Stonebridge
- This topic has 455 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
ocrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
January 23, 2008 at 8:39 PM #11617
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:02 PM #141655
patientlywaiting
ParticipantToo far from the 15. You’re almost in red-neck country.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:02 PM #141882
patientlywaiting
ParticipantToo far from the 15. You’re almost in red-neck country.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:02 PM #141895
patientlywaiting
ParticipantToo far from the 15. You’re almost in red-neck country.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:02 PM #141920
patientlywaiting
ParticipantToo far from the 15. You’re almost in red-neck country.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:02 PM #141984
patientlywaiting
ParticipantToo far from the 15. You’re almost in red-neck country.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:44 PM #141705
SD Realtor
ParticipantChargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.
-
March 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #526993
kcal09
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Chargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.[/quote]
I have been following “Serenity” for about 2 years and surprisingly those homes are selling fast now even without significant discounts or free upgrades. It looks like the people who want to buy a new home have not many choices in SD anymore and Stonebridge is one of the few “affordable” neighborhoods.
-
March 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #527126
kcal09
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Chargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.[/quote]
I have been following “Serenity” for about 2 years and surprisingly those homes are selling fast now even without significant discounts or free upgrades. It looks like the people who want to buy a new home have not many choices in SD anymore and Stonebridge is one of the few “affordable” neighborhoods.
-
March 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #527573
kcal09
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Chargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.[/quote]
I have been following “Serenity” for about 2 years and surprisingly those homes are selling fast now even without significant discounts or free upgrades. It looks like the people who want to buy a new home have not many choices in SD anymore and Stonebridge is one of the few “affordable” neighborhoods.
-
March 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #527670
kcal09
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Chargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.[/quote]
I have been following “Serenity” for about 2 years and surprisingly those homes are selling fast now even without significant discounts or free upgrades. It looks like the people who want to buy a new home have not many choices in SD anymore and Stonebridge is one of the few “affordable” neighborhoods.
-
March 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM #527929
kcal09
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Chargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.[/quote]
I have been following “Serenity” for about 2 years and surprisingly those homes are selling fast now even without significant discounts or free upgrades. It looks like the people who want to buy a new home have not many choices in SD anymore and Stonebridge is one of the few “affordable” neighborhoods.
-
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:44 PM #141933
SD Realtor
ParticipantChargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:44 PM #141946
SD Realtor
ParticipantChargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:44 PM #141972
SD Realtor
ParticipantChargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.
-
January 23, 2008 at 9:44 PM #142034
SD Realtor
ParticipantChargersin09 –
I live right around the corner from stonebridge. Rather then talk about unique floorplans and such I would rather just give a general analysis. First off I would point out to you that there have been more then a few distressed sales in Stonebridge. I expect that trend to absolutely continue.
One of the things I notice about posts that solicit opinions about particular locations or developments is that responses tend to carry a more negative bias then positive. I think it is always easier to find fault with a location/development then not. The bottom line is that in many cases these are all opinions more then anything else. There are sometimes more factual points brought out and those are helpful. Yet I cannot help but think in some cases lurkers or others will not post for fear of being slammed.
That said, my overall opinion of Stonebridge is simply nyah…I can take it or leave it but for the money I think I would rather live on the south side of Pomerado in Old Scripps. Stonebridge is a bit to wide open for me and it is far off from 15. I get on Pomerado at Semillon and I curse the commute each day. So if I were farther back where Stonebridge is that simply would not suit me. As for the distressed sales that is 100% factual. In each of these cases that you mentioned I am sure you could get a very good deal if you have patience and are not afraid to walk away from a deal here and there.
Miramar is not a big deal. As far as the brush goes again, I don’t see much of an issue there. If you are on the canyon it obviously behooves you to keep your slope clear.
As far as my opinions above they are only that… just opinions. Please don’t take them for anything else other then that. I think if you like Stonebridge then by all means go for it. I do believe it will depreciate but so will other comparable areas. Anyways just make sure you get the best deal possible.
-
March 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM #527048
ybitz
ParticipantHow much are these two plans (Sanctuary plan 2 and Scripps Preserve plan 1) going for? Is there HOA/MR too?
-
March 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM #527068
HomeShopping
ParticipantI believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM #527324
kcal09
Participant[quote=HomeShopping]I believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there%5B/quote%5D
These were the last few homes when Davidson wanted to close the deal. Most of the homes were sold for about $200k more.
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM #527456
kcal09
Participant[quote=HomeShopping]I believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there%5B/quote%5D
These were the last few homes when Davidson wanted to close the deal. Most of the homes were sold for about $200k more.
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM #527904
kcal09
Participant[quote=HomeShopping]I believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there%5B/quote%5D
These were the last few homes when Davidson wanted to close the deal. Most of the homes were sold for about $200k more.
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM #528002
kcal09
Participant[quote=HomeShopping]I believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there%5B/quote%5D
These were the last few homes when Davidson wanted to close the deal. Most of the homes were sold for about $200k more.
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM #528259
kcal09
Participant[quote=HomeShopping]I believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there%5B/quote%5D
These were the last few homes when Davidson wanted to close the deal. Most of the homes were sold for about $200k more.
-
-
March 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM #527201
HomeShopping
ParticipantI believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there
-
March 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM #527648
HomeShopping
ParticipantI believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there
-
March 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM #527745
HomeShopping
ParticipantI believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there
-
March 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM #528004
HomeShopping
ParticipantI believe that Sanctuary and Scripps Preserve are sold out, from the builder at least. They both have HOA/MR.
The last phase of Scripps Preserve sold for rock bottom:
“3-12-09 15572 Via La Ventana $735K
3-02-09 15533 Mission Preserve Pl $750K
3-30-09 15581 Via La Ventana $798KThose are some nice homes, ranging from 4600-5800 sf. Lot sizes averaged around 16,000 sf.
I think at those prices that Davidson may have sold below cost. I agree that we may not see those kinds of prices ever again.”http://piggington.com/stonebridge_estates_scripps_preserve_what039s_going_on_there
-
-
March 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM #527181
ybitz
ParticipantHow much are these two plans (Sanctuary plan 2 and Scripps Preserve plan 1) going for? Is there HOA/MR too?
-
March 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM #527628
ybitz
ParticipantHow much are these two plans (Sanctuary plan 2 and Scripps Preserve plan 1) going for? Is there HOA/MR too?
-
March 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM #527725
ybitz
ParticipantHow much are these two plans (Sanctuary plan 2 and Scripps Preserve plan 1) going for? Is there HOA/MR too?
-
March 17, 2010 at 8:42 PM #527984
ybitz
ParticipantHow much are these two plans (Sanctuary plan 2 and Scripps Preserve plan 1) going for? Is there HOA/MR too?
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM #527761
Echoooo
ParticipantI have been following Stonebridge too. It used to be my first choice, but with more and more research and seeing that builders and resales in STonebridge start to be unrealistic again, I start to favor 4S ranch (south of Camino de Norte) resales…
-
March 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM #527790
kcal09
ParticipantI agree, 4S Ranch south is much more convenient and the neighborhood there is done developing. In contrast, Stonebridge is facing a lot of problems with mortgages under water and the location is inconvenient.
-
March 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM #527923
kcal09
ParticipantI agree, 4S Ranch south is much more convenient and the neighborhood there is done developing. In contrast, Stonebridge is facing a lot of problems with mortgages under water and the location is inconvenient.
-
March 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM #528371
kcal09
ParticipantI agree, 4S Ranch south is much more convenient and the neighborhood there is done developing. In contrast, Stonebridge is facing a lot of problems with mortgages under water and the location is inconvenient.
-
March 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM #528468
kcal09
ParticipantI agree, 4S Ranch south is much more convenient and the neighborhood there is done developing. In contrast, Stonebridge is facing a lot of problems with mortgages under water and the location is inconvenient.
-
March 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM #528726
kcal09
ParticipantI agree, 4S Ranch south is much more convenient and the neighborhood there is done developing. In contrast, Stonebridge is facing a lot of problems with mortgages under water and the location is inconvenient.
-
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM #527893
Echoooo
ParticipantI have been following Stonebridge too. It used to be my first choice, but with more and more research and seeing that builders and resales in STonebridge start to be unrealistic again, I start to favor 4S ranch (south of Camino de Norte) resales…
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM #528341
Echoooo
ParticipantI have been following Stonebridge too. It used to be my first choice, but with more and more research and seeing that builders and resales in STonebridge start to be unrealistic again, I start to favor 4S ranch (south of Camino de Norte) resales…
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM #528438
Echoooo
ParticipantI have been following Stonebridge too. It used to be my first choice, but with more and more research and seeing that builders and resales in STonebridge start to be unrealistic again, I start to favor 4S ranch (south of Camino de Norte) resales…
-
March 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM #528696
Echoooo
ParticipantI have been following Stonebridge too. It used to be my first choice, but with more and more research and seeing that builders and resales in STonebridge start to be unrealistic again, I start to favor 4S ranch (south of Camino de Norte) resales…
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #648427
kcal09
ParticipantThis Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM #648432
recordsclerk
Participant[quote=kcal09]This Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
This is a Serenity home. Way overpriced IMHO. I would rather take a shot at this short sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100050639-13358_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or you could have bought the model at Tiburon:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100006008-15242_Maple_Grove_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM #648472
SD Realtor
Participantkcal I think that right now for inventory that just hits the market in Stonebridge right now, it will be hard to get a good deal. Now if something is distressed or has been sitting for awhile that is a different story. We are coming into the season of hope! That is, over the next 3 months more people will put their homes on the market with hopes of sugar plum money coming their way… Those that don’t sell may be riper for deals in the summertime. Agreed that the Serenity home is overpriced. Look for more of the same.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM #648487
kcal09
ParticipantThank you for your input. I didn’t realize that this is a Serenity home. Some of the Sanctuary homes were sold at this price and they are way nicer.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM #648497
recordsclerk
ParticipantAgreed that Sanctuary is nicer. It seems to me that Serenity is a cheaper version of Sanctuary/Tiburon.
I think there have been a few decent deals in the last couple of months.
There is the infamous Shadtree Calabria home at $166 a sqft.:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story from the builder at $198 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100057905-15709_E_Bluff_Cove_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story plan 1 Sanctuary with second story loft over the master at $183 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100033337-14803_Whispering_Ridge_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.
-
January 6, 2011 at 5:03 PM #648542
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.
-
January 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM #648622
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.[/quote]
If we assume the likely scenario that the interest rates will go up over the next years then more homeowners at Stonebridge will end up defaulting and home prices will drop.
-
January 7, 2011 at 7:17 AM #648682
SD Realtor
ParticipantOnly if they are in adjustable rate vehicles. We are starting to siphon out alot of that. However the premise is still true that prices will come down simply because it will be harder to finance those prices and the buyer pool will shrink a bit. However don’t assume the rubber band effect happens immediately.
-
January 7, 2011 at 7:17 AM #648753
SD Realtor
ParticipantOnly if they are in adjustable rate vehicles. We are starting to siphon out alot of that. However the premise is still true that prices will come down simply because it will be harder to finance those prices and the buyer pool will shrink a bit. However don’t assume the rubber band effect happens immediately.
-
January 7, 2011 at 7:17 AM #649339
SD Realtor
ParticipantOnly if they are in adjustable rate vehicles. We are starting to siphon out alot of that. However the premise is still true that prices will come down simply because it will be harder to finance those prices and the buyer pool will shrink a bit. However don’t assume the rubber band effect happens immediately.
-
January 7, 2011 at 7:17 AM #649475
SD Realtor
ParticipantOnly if they are in adjustable rate vehicles. We are starting to siphon out alot of that. However the premise is still true that prices will come down simply because it will be harder to finance those prices and the buyer pool will shrink a bit. However don’t assume the rubber band effect happens immediately.
-
January 7, 2011 at 7:17 AM #649801
SD Realtor
ParticipantOnly if they are in adjustable rate vehicles. We are starting to siphon out alot of that. However the premise is still true that prices will come down simply because it will be harder to finance those prices and the buyer pool will shrink a bit. However don’t assume the rubber band effect happens immediately.
-
January 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM #648693
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.[/quote]
If we assume the likely scenario that the interest rates will go up over the next years then more homeowners at Stonebridge will end up defaulting and home prices will drop.
-
January 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM #649279
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.[/quote]
If we assume the likely scenario that the interest rates will go up over the next years then more homeowners at Stonebridge will end up defaulting and home prices will drop.
-
January 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM #649416
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.[/quote]
If we assume the likely scenario that the interest rates will go up over the next years then more homeowners at Stonebridge will end up defaulting and home prices will drop.
-
January 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM #649741
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.[/quote]
If we assume the likely scenario that the interest rates will go up over the next years then more homeowners at Stonebridge will end up defaulting and home prices will drop.
-
January 6, 2011 at 5:03 PM #648613
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.
-
January 6, 2011 at 5:03 PM #649199
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.
-
January 6, 2011 at 5:03 PM #649336
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.
-
January 6, 2011 at 5:03 PM #649661
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]
IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.[/quote]
I don’t think you have to worry too much about that. there’s going to be distress in these type of neighborhoods for the next few years.
what I don’t know is how the interest rate would look like by then.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM #648568
recordsclerk
ParticipantAgreed that Sanctuary is nicer. It seems to me that Serenity is a cheaper version of Sanctuary/Tiburon.
I think there have been a few decent deals in the last couple of months.
There is the infamous Shadtree Calabria home at $166 a sqft.:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story from the builder at $198 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100057905-15709_E_Bluff_Cove_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story plan 1 Sanctuary with second story loft over the master at $183 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100033337-14803_Whispering_Ridge_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM #649154
recordsclerk
ParticipantAgreed that Sanctuary is nicer. It seems to me that Serenity is a cheaper version of Sanctuary/Tiburon.
I think there have been a few decent deals in the last couple of months.
There is the infamous Shadtree Calabria home at $166 a sqft.:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story from the builder at $198 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100057905-15709_E_Bluff_Cove_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story plan 1 Sanctuary with second story loft over the master at $183 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100033337-14803_Whispering_Ridge_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM #649291
recordsclerk
ParticipantAgreed that Sanctuary is nicer. It seems to me that Serenity is a cheaper version of Sanctuary/Tiburon.
I think there have been a few decent deals in the last couple of months.
There is the infamous Shadtree Calabria home at $166 a sqft.:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story from the builder at $198 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100057905-15709_E_Bluff_Cove_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story plan 1 Sanctuary with second story loft over the master at $183 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100033337-14803_Whispering_Ridge_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:52 PM #649616
recordsclerk
ParticipantAgreed that Sanctuary is nicer. It seems to me that Serenity is a cheaper version of Sanctuary/Tiburon.
I think there have been a few decent deals in the last couple of months.
There is the infamous Shadtree Calabria home at $166 a sqft.:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100054326-13348_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story from the builder at $198 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100057905-15709_E_Bluff_Cove_San_Diego_CA_92131Then there is this one story plan 1 Sanctuary with second story loft over the master at $183 sqft:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100033337-14803_Whispering_Ridge_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131IMHO these are pretty good deals. I hope these type of deals will be around when I’m ready to buy in 2 years.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM #648558
kcal09
ParticipantThank you for your input. I didn’t realize that this is a Serenity home. Some of the Sanctuary homes were sold at this price and they are way nicer.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM #649144
kcal09
ParticipantThank you for your input. I didn’t realize that this is a Serenity home. Some of the Sanctuary homes were sold at this price and they are way nicer.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM #649281
kcal09
ParticipantThank you for your input. I didn’t realize that this is a Serenity home. Some of the Sanctuary homes were sold at this price and they are way nicer.
-
January 6, 2011 at 2:16 PM #649606
kcal09
ParticipantThank you for your input. I didn’t realize that this is a Serenity home. Some of the Sanctuary homes were sold at this price and they are way nicer.
-
January 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM #648543
SD Realtor
Participantkcal I think that right now for inventory that just hits the market in Stonebridge right now, it will be hard to get a good deal. Now if something is distressed or has been sitting for awhile that is a different story. We are coming into the season of hope! That is, over the next 3 months more people will put their homes on the market with hopes of sugar plum money coming their way… Those that don’t sell may be riper for deals in the summertime. Agreed that the Serenity home is overpriced. Look for more of the same.
-
January 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM #649129
SD Realtor
Participantkcal I think that right now for inventory that just hits the market in Stonebridge right now, it will be hard to get a good deal. Now if something is distressed or has been sitting for awhile that is a different story. We are coming into the season of hope! That is, over the next 3 months more people will put their homes on the market with hopes of sugar plum money coming their way… Those that don’t sell may be riper for deals in the summertime. Agreed that the Serenity home is overpriced. Look for more of the same.
-
January 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM #649266
SD Realtor
Participantkcal I think that right now for inventory that just hits the market in Stonebridge right now, it will be hard to get a good deal. Now if something is distressed or has been sitting for awhile that is a different story. We are coming into the season of hope! That is, over the next 3 months more people will put their homes on the market with hopes of sugar plum money coming their way… Those that don’t sell may be riper for deals in the summertime. Agreed that the Serenity home is overpriced. Look for more of the same.
-
January 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM #649591
SD Realtor
Participantkcal I think that right now for inventory that just hits the market in Stonebridge right now, it will be hard to get a good deal. Now if something is distressed or has been sitting for awhile that is a different story. We are coming into the season of hope! That is, over the next 3 months more people will put their homes on the market with hopes of sugar plum money coming their way… Those that don’t sell may be riper for deals in the summertime. Agreed that the Serenity home is overpriced. Look for more of the same.
-
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM #648503
recordsclerk
Participant[quote=kcal09]This Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
This is a Serenity home. Way overpriced IMHO. I would rather take a shot at this short sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100050639-13358_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or you could have bought the model at Tiburon:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100006008-15242_Maple_Grove_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM #649089
recordsclerk
Participant[quote=kcal09]This Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
This is a Serenity home. Way overpriced IMHO. I would rather take a shot at this short sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100050639-13358_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or you could have bought the model at Tiburon:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100006008-15242_Maple_Grove_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM #649226
recordsclerk
Participant[quote=kcal09]This Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
This is a Serenity home. Way overpriced IMHO. I would rather take a shot at this short sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100050639-13358_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or you could have bought the model at Tiburon:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100006008-15242_Maple_Grove_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM #649551
recordsclerk
Participant[quote=kcal09]This Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
This is a Serenity home. Way overpriced IMHO. I would rather take a shot at this short sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or this:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100050639-13358_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
Or you could have bought the model at Tiburon:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100006008-15242_Maple_Grove_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #648498
kcal09
ParticipantThis Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #649084
kcal09
ParticipantThis Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #649221
kcal09
ParticipantThis Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 6, 2011 at 12:09 PM #649546
kcal09
ParticipantThis Sanctuary home just came on the market as a regular sale. What do you think, is it fairly priced in the current market or overpriced?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110001007-14121_Green_Valley_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 12:47 PM #650593
sunny88
ParticipantThis home just cam on the market. It’s a “Sanctuary” Plan 1 and a short sale. I think this is a pretty good deal at the current asking price. What do others think?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM #650612
recordsclerk
ParticipantVery nice house. The price is about right.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM #650657
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes I agree… not bad. It will be interesting to see what it goes for.
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM #650731
sunny88
ParticipantThe high MR may be the only drawback. I would guess that it probably will go for a little less than $ 1 million. There is another home just down the streeet that has been on and off the market for a long time. I wonder why this one hasn’t sold yet despite the higher square footage and lower asking price…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Could it be that more distressed homes will surface in the near future ?
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM #650799
sunny88
ParticipantThe high MR may be the only drawback. I would guess that it probably will go for a little less than $ 1 million. There is another home just down the streeet that has been on and off the market for a long time. I wonder why this one hasn’t sold yet despite the higher square footage and lower asking price…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Could it be that more distressed homes will surface in the near future ?
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM #651382
sunny88
ParticipantThe high MR may be the only drawback. I would guess that it probably will go for a little less than $ 1 million. There is another home just down the streeet that has been on and off the market for a long time. I wonder why this one hasn’t sold yet despite the higher square footage and lower asking price…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Could it be that more distressed homes will surface in the near future ?
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM #651517
sunny88
ParticipantThe high MR may be the only drawback. I would guess that it probably will go for a little less than $ 1 million. There is another home just down the streeet that has been on and off the market for a long time. I wonder why this one hasn’t sold yet despite the higher square footage and lower asking price…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Could it be that more distressed homes will surface in the near future ?
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM #651843
sunny88
ParticipantThe high MR may be the only drawback. I would guess that it probably will go for a little less than $ 1 million. There is another home just down the streeet that has been on and off the market for a long time. I wonder why this one hasn’t sold yet despite the higher square footage and lower asking price…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100051901-14661_Old_Creek_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92131
Could it be that more distressed homes will surface in the near future ?
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM #650725
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes I agree… not bad. It will be interesting to see what it goes for.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM #651307
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes I agree… not bad. It will be interesting to see what it goes for.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM #651442
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes I agree… not bad. It will be interesting to see what it goes for.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:47 PM #651767
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes I agree… not bad. It will be interesting to see what it goes for.
-
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM #650681
recordsclerk
ParticipantVery nice house. The price is about right.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM #651264
recordsclerk
ParticipantVery nice house. The price is about right.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM #651398
recordsclerk
ParticipantVery nice house. The price is about right.
-
January 10, 2011 at 1:27 PM #651721
recordsclerk
ParticipantVery nice house. The price is about right.
-
-
January 10, 2011 at 12:47 PM #650661
sunny88
ParticipantThis home just cam on the market. It’s a “Sanctuary” Plan 1 and a short sale. I think this is a pretty good deal at the current asking price. What do others think?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 12:47 PM #651244
sunny88
ParticipantThis home just cam on the market. It’s a “Sanctuary” Plan 1 and a short sale. I think this is a pretty good deal at the current asking price. What do others think?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 12:47 PM #651378
sunny88
ParticipantThis home just cam on the market. It’s a “Sanctuary” Plan 1 and a short sale. I think this is a pretty good deal at the current asking price. What do others think?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 12:47 PM #651701
sunny88
ParticipantThis home just cam on the market. It’s a “Sanctuary” Plan 1 and a short sale. I think this is a pretty good deal at the current asking price. What do others think?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110000974-14715_Old_Creek_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM #650740
kcal09
ParticipantThis bigger one went in and out of escrow a couple times. It’s condition is not as good as the first one and it’s a 2 story home which may be less attractive to some buyers. As far as distressed properties in Stonebridge, I think there will be more to come, especially in the higher end neighborhoods with purchase dates around 2005/06 when buyers were paying crazy amounts to get in these homes.
-
January 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM #650750
SD Realtor
ParticipantAbsolutely more distress to come in Stonebridge.
-
January 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM #650819
SD Realtor
ParticipantAbsolutely more distress to come in Stonebridge.
-
January 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM #651402
SD Realtor
ParticipantAbsolutely more distress to come in Stonebridge.
-
January 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM #651537
SD Realtor
ParticipantAbsolutely more distress to come in Stonebridge.
-
January 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM #651863
SD Realtor
ParticipantAbsolutely more distress to come in Stonebridge.
-
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM #650809
kcal09
ParticipantThis bigger one went in and out of escrow a couple times. It’s condition is not as good as the first one and it’s a 2 story home which may be less attractive to some buyers. As far as distressed properties in Stonebridge, I think there will be more to come, especially in the higher end neighborhoods with purchase dates around 2005/06 when buyers were paying crazy amounts to get in these homes.
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM #651392
kcal09
ParticipantThis bigger one went in and out of escrow a couple times. It’s condition is not as good as the first one and it’s a 2 story home which may be less attractive to some buyers. As far as distressed properties in Stonebridge, I think there will be more to come, especially in the higher end neighborhoods with purchase dates around 2005/06 when buyers were paying crazy amounts to get in these homes.
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM #651527
kcal09
ParticipantThis bigger one went in and out of escrow a couple times. It’s condition is not as good as the first one and it’s a 2 story home which may be less attractive to some buyers. As far as distressed properties in Stonebridge, I think there will be more to come, especially in the higher end neighborhoods with purchase dates around 2005/06 when buyers were paying crazy amounts to get in these homes.
-
January 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM #651853
kcal09
ParticipantThis bigger one went in and out of escrow a couple times. It’s condition is not as good as the first one and it’s a 2 story home which may be less attractive to some buyers. As far as distressed properties in Stonebridge, I think there will be more to come, especially in the higher end neighborhoods with purchase dates around 2005/06 when buyers were paying crazy amounts to get in these homes.
-
January 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM #659632
rcesaitis
ParticipantMy family and I are looking at moving to the area this coming summer. We have done extensive research on this community and also looked at houses in Poway too. We’ve looked at new construction vs resales and compared the advantages and disadvantages of both. Does anyone know what the payoff amount for the Mello Roos are for this community? We’re all ears if you have any other ideas/suggestions too.
Thanks in advance.
-
January 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM #659667
DataAgent
ParticipantCall the county treasurer @ 877-829-4732 and ask for a payoff amount.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM #662752
rcesaitis
ParticipantThanks
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM #662814
rcesaitis
ParticipantThanks
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM #663418
rcesaitis
ParticipantThanks
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM #663554
rcesaitis
ParticipantThanks
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:03 PM #663892
rcesaitis
ParticipantThanks
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:04 PM #662757
rcesaitis
ParticipantThat number was for a medicare plan? Any others to try?
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM #662787
SD Realtor
ParticipantJust google san diego county tax assessor or go to sdtreastax.com.
Most of the stonebridge homes have quite a ways to go until the bonds mature. I would be surprised if anything matures before 2020 and 2025 to 2030 would be my best guess.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM #662849
SD Realtor
ParticipantJust google san diego county tax assessor or go to sdtreastax.com.
Most of the stonebridge homes have quite a ways to go until the bonds mature. I would be surprised if anything matures before 2020 and 2025 to 2030 would be my best guess.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM #663452
SD Realtor
ParticipantJust google san diego county tax assessor or go to sdtreastax.com.
Most of the stonebridge homes have quite a ways to go until the bonds mature. I would be surprised if anything matures before 2020 and 2025 to 2030 would be my best guess.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM #663589
SD Realtor
ParticipantJust google san diego county tax assessor or go to sdtreastax.com.
Most of the stonebridge homes have quite a ways to go until the bonds mature. I would be surprised if anything matures before 2020 and 2025 to 2030 would be my best guess.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM #663927
SD Realtor
ParticipantJust google san diego county tax assessor or go to sdtreastax.com.
Most of the stonebridge homes have quite a ways to go until the bonds mature. I would be surprised if anything matures before 2020 and 2025 to 2030 would be my best guess.
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:04 PM #662819
rcesaitis
ParticipantThat number was for a medicare plan? Any others to try?
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:04 PM #663423
rcesaitis
ParticipantThat number was for a medicare plan? Any others to try?
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:04 PM #663559
rcesaitis
ParticipantThat number was for a medicare plan? Any others to try?
-
February 4, 2011 at 2:04 PM #663897
rcesaitis
ParticipantThat number was for a medicare plan? Any others to try?
-
-
January 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM #659730
DataAgent
ParticipantCall the county treasurer @ 877-829-4732 and ask for a payoff amount.
-
January 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM #660333
DataAgent
ParticipantCall the county treasurer @ 877-829-4732 and ask for a payoff amount.
-
January 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM #660472
DataAgent
ParticipantCall the county treasurer @ 877-829-4732 and ask for a payoff amount.
-
January 29, 2011 at 6:59 PM #660801
DataAgent
ParticipantCall the county treasurer @ 877-829-4732 and ask for a payoff amount.
-
-
January 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM #659695
rcesaitis
ParticipantMy family and I are looking at moving to the area this coming summer. We have done extensive research on this community and also looked at houses in Poway too. We’ve looked at new construction vs resales and compared the advantages and disadvantages of both. Does anyone know what the payoff amount for the Mello Roos are for this community? We’re all ears if you have any other ideas/suggestions too.
Thanks in advance.
-
January 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM #660298
rcesaitis
ParticipantMy family and I are looking at moving to the area this coming summer. We have done extensive research on this community and also looked at houses in Poway too. We’ve looked at new construction vs resales and compared the advantages and disadvantages of both. Does anyone know what the payoff amount for the Mello Roos are for this community? We’re all ears if you have any other ideas/suggestions too.
Thanks in advance.
-
January 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM #660437
rcesaitis
ParticipantMy family and I are looking at moving to the area this coming summer. We have done extensive research on this community and also looked at houses in Poway too. We’ve looked at new construction vs resales and compared the advantages and disadvantages of both. Does anyone know what the payoff amount for the Mello Roos are for this community? We’re all ears if you have any other ideas/suggestions too.
Thanks in advance.
-
January 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM #660766
rcesaitis
ParticipantMy family and I are looking at moving to the area this coming summer. We have done extensive research on this community and also looked at houses in Poway too. We’ve looked at new construction vs resales and compared the advantages and disadvantages of both. Does anyone know what the payoff amount for the Mello Roos are for this community? We’re all ears if you have any other ideas/suggestions too.
Thanks in advance.
-
January 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM #659717
kcal09
ParticipantThere are nice homes in Poway without Mello Roos. The schools are good and you can get a decent home for around $800k – 1 million. Stonebridge has newer homes but MR is in the $5-7k range and there are a lot of distressed properties.
-
January 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM #659902
sunny88
ParticipantI prefer Poway too-more established neighborhoods, far fewer distressed properties compared to Stonebridge and no MR. Also, school district is one of the best in SD county.
-
January 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM #659965
sunny88
ParticipantI prefer Poway too-more established neighborhoods, far fewer distressed properties compared to Stonebridge and no MR. Also, school district is one of the best in SD county.
-
January 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM #660569
sunny88
ParticipantI prefer Poway too-more established neighborhoods, far fewer distressed properties compared to Stonebridge and no MR. Also, school district is one of the best in SD county.
-
January 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM #660707
sunny88
ParticipantI prefer Poway too-more established neighborhoods, far fewer distressed properties compared to Stonebridge and no MR. Also, school district is one of the best in SD county.
-
January 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM #661036
sunny88
ParticipantI prefer Poway too-more established neighborhoods, far fewer distressed properties compared to Stonebridge and no MR. Also, school district is one of the best in SD county.
-
-
January 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM #659780
kcal09
ParticipantThere are nice homes in Poway without Mello Roos. The schools are good and you can get a decent home for around $800k – 1 million. Stonebridge has newer homes but MR is in the $5-7k range and there are a lot of distressed properties.
-
January 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM #660383
kcal09
ParticipantThere are nice homes in Poway without Mello Roos. The schools are good and you can get a decent home for around $800k – 1 million. Stonebridge has newer homes but MR is in the $5-7k range and there are a lot of distressed properties.
-
January 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM #660522
kcal09
ParticipantThere are nice homes in Poway without Mello Roos. The schools are good and you can get a decent home for around $800k – 1 million. Stonebridge has newer homes but MR is in the $5-7k range and there are a lot of distressed properties.
-
January 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM #660851
kcal09
ParticipantThere are nice homes in Poway without Mello Roos. The schools are good and you can get a decent home for around $800k – 1 million. Stonebridge has newer homes but MR is in the $5-7k range and there are a lot of distressed properties.
-
June 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM #702353
recordsclerk
ParticipantSeems like a lot of new listings hitting the market in the last couple of weeks:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110031042-15624_Cobble_Creek_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033750-11465_Carowind_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028568-13340_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110032131-12844_Starwood_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033330-13169_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM #702373
briansd1
GuestSpeaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.
-
June 10, 2011 at 1:08 PM #702383
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]Speaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.[/quote]
that sums up the bubble.
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)
-
June 10, 2011 at 4:03 PM #702429
briansd1
Guest[quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. 😉
-
June 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM #702449
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. ;)[/quote]
In the case of Cobble Creek, the house was purchased for nearly $1.2 mil. $200k in improvements on these homes inside and out is doable, but only if the homeowner is quite savvy. If someone bought at the peak, most likely they went on to put another $300-400k inside and out. So basically possibly getting $600k in discount if you are the successful short sale buyer.
-
June 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM #702548
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. ;)[/quote]
In the case of Cobble Creek, the house was purchased for nearly $1.2 mil. $200k in improvements on these homes inside and out is doable, but only if the homeowner is quite savvy. If someone bought at the peak, most likely they went on to put another $300-400k inside and out. So basically possibly getting $600k in discount if you are the successful short sale buyer.
-
June 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM #703140
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. ;)[/quote]
In the case of Cobble Creek, the house was purchased for nearly $1.2 mil. $200k in improvements on these homes inside and out is doable, but only if the homeowner is quite savvy. If someone bought at the peak, most likely they went on to put another $300-400k inside and out. So basically possibly getting $600k in discount if you are the successful short sale buyer.
-
June 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM #703289
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. ;)[/quote]
In the case of Cobble Creek, the house was purchased for nearly $1.2 mil. $200k in improvements on these homes inside and out is doable, but only if the homeowner is quite savvy. If someone bought at the peak, most likely they went on to put another $300-400k inside and out. So basically possibly getting $600k in discount if you are the successful short sale buyer.
-
June 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM #703646
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. ;)[/quote]
In the case of Cobble Creek, the house was purchased for nearly $1.2 mil. $200k in improvements on these homes inside and out is doable, but only if the homeowner is quite savvy. If someone bought at the peak, most likely they went on to put another $300-400k inside and out. So basically possibly getting $600k in discount if you are the successful short sale buyer.
-
June 10, 2011 at 4:03 PM #702528
briansd1
Guest[quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. 😉
-
June 10, 2011 at 4:03 PM #703120
briansd1
Guest[quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. 😉
-
June 10, 2011 at 4:03 PM #703269
briansd1
Guest[quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. 😉
-
June 10, 2011 at 4:03 PM #703626
briansd1
Guest[quote=ocrenter]
that sums up the bubble.
[/quote]I’d really took a bubble mentality to buy those houses in 2007 and then sink $100-200k into them for improvements.
Buyers today, are not only getting lower prices, but they are getting the pool, landscaping and improvements for “free”.
[quote=ocrenter]
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)[/quote]I’m trying. 😉
-
June 10, 2011 at 1:08 PM #702482
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]Speaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.[/quote]
that sums up the bubble.
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)
-
June 10, 2011 at 1:08 PM #703075
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]Speaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.[/quote]
that sums up the bubble.
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)
-
June 10, 2011 at 1:08 PM #703224
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]Speaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.[/quote]
that sums up the bubble.
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)
-
June 10, 2011 at 1:08 PM #703581
ocrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]Speaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.[/quote]
that sums up the bubble.
now head out and take full advantage of the situation! =)
-
-
June 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM #702472
briansd1
GuestSpeaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.
-
June 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM #703065
briansd1
GuestSpeaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.
-
June 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM #703214
briansd1
GuestSpeaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.
-
June 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM #703571
briansd1
GuestSpeaking of wherewithal, it’s hard for me to understand people buying million dollar houses, then spending the money to put in pool and improvements, without the wherewithal to hang on.
It confirms my theory that buyers max-out on what they can afford, then when they can’t refinance and kick the can down the road, they default.
-
-
June 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM #702452
recordsclerk
ParticipantSeems like a lot of new listings hitting the market in the last couple of weeks:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110031042-15624_Cobble_Creek_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033750-11465_Carowind_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028568-13340_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110032131-12844_Starwood_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033330-13169_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM #703045
recordsclerk
ParticipantSeems like a lot of new listings hitting the market in the last couple of weeks:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110031042-15624_Cobble_Creek_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033750-11465_Carowind_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028568-13340_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110032131-12844_Starwood_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033330-13169_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM #703194
recordsclerk
ParticipantSeems like a lot of new listings hitting the market in the last couple of weeks:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110031042-15624_Cobble_Creek_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033750-11465_Carowind_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028568-13340_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110032131-12844_Starwood_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033330-13169_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 10, 2011 at 11:15 AM #703551
recordsclerk
ParticipantSeems like a lot of new listings hitting the market in the last couple of weeks:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110031042-15624_Cobble_Creek_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033750-11465_Carowind_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028568-13340_Shadetree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110032131-12844_Starwood_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110033330-13169_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM #702610
kcal09
ParticipantThe way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.
-
June 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM #702720
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]The way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.[/quote]
Depends on what you are refering to. The new home asking prices at the sales offices? Or the short sale asking price. You can’t get much better than the short sale prices, in fact those are actually a little unrealistic at this point. Definitely would not recommend any of the new home offerings at this point.
-
June 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM #702805
kcal09
ParticipantI would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM #702850
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]I would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.[/quote]
which ones are you referring to re: $700k range? the smaller 3000ish homes on avg 8000 sqft lots or the 4-5000 sqft homes on avg 1/3-1/2 acre lots?
the smaller 3000ish homes are already in the 700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702855
kcal09
Participant…the Serenity homes.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM #702860
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM #702870
recordsclerk
ParticipantThere is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.
-
June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM #702915
recordsclerk
ParticipantAnother listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the forclosure that listed for 814K (pending).
-
June 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM #703101
kcal09
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Another listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the foreclosure that listed for 814K (pending).[/quote]
Wow, this one is clearly overpriced as the location is pretty poor with the Stonebridge Pkwy in the front and power lines in the back.
-
June 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM #703198
kcal09
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Another listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the foreclosure that listed for 814K (pending).[/quote]
Wow, this one is clearly overpriced as the location is pretty poor with the Stonebridge Pkwy in the front and power lines in the back.
-
June 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM #703788
kcal09
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Another listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the foreclosure that listed for 814K (pending).[/quote]
Wow, this one is clearly overpriced as the location is pretty poor with the Stonebridge Pkwy in the front and power lines in the back.
-
June 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM #703936
kcal09
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Another listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the foreclosure that listed for 814K (pending).[/quote]
Wow, this one is clearly overpriced as the location is pretty poor with the Stonebridge Pkwy in the front and power lines in the back.
-
June 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM #704295
kcal09
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Another listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the foreclosure that listed for 814K (pending).[/quote]
Wow, this one is clearly overpriced as the location is pretty poor with the Stonebridge Pkwy in the front and power lines in the back.
-
June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM #703013
recordsclerk
ParticipantAnother listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the forclosure that listed for 814K (pending).
-
June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM #703604
recordsclerk
ParticipantAnother listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the forclosure that listed for 814K (pending).
-
June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM #703752
recordsclerk
ParticipantAnother listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the forclosure that listed for 814K (pending).
-
June 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM #704111
recordsclerk
ParticipantAnother listing:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034294-13382_Greenstone_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
This one is 2 doors down from the forclosure that listed for 814K (pending).
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM #703051
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]There is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.[/quote]
I always thought cheaper replacement developments such as serenity and montoro would go down into the 700k range, but they have really defied expectation. especially when these homes are absolutely so poorly constructed. but if you look in zillow, localguy is absolutely correct, these homes are finding buyers. a bunch of powerline view serenity homes actually went for $1 million earlier this year. (at the same time that some purchased much better Tiburon close outs for $1 million)
on the other hand, the replacement viscaya homes by city venture (the ones with minimal lots and slopes in back) did go into the mid-700k range. same thing with those davidson homes in late 08/early 09, 2-3 of them that had the same lot deficiencies also went for the mid-700k range.
this is why I wanted more specifics with kcal09. because some of what he “predicted” already happened, just not yet with serenity.
now if he is predicting fully loaded original resales from davidson, shea, and tiburon in the 700k, that would really be some way out on a limb prediction.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM #703148
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]There is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.[/quote]
I always thought cheaper replacement developments such as serenity and montoro would go down into the 700k range, but they have really defied expectation. especially when these homes are absolutely so poorly constructed. but if you look in zillow, localguy is absolutely correct, these homes are finding buyers. a bunch of powerline view serenity homes actually went for $1 million earlier this year. (at the same time that some purchased much better Tiburon close outs for $1 million)
on the other hand, the replacement viscaya homes by city venture (the ones with minimal lots and slopes in back) did go into the mid-700k range. same thing with those davidson homes in late 08/early 09, 2-3 of them that had the same lot deficiencies also went for the mid-700k range.
this is why I wanted more specifics with kcal09. because some of what he “predicted” already happened, just not yet with serenity.
now if he is predicting fully loaded original resales from davidson, shea, and tiburon in the 700k, that would really be some way out on a limb prediction.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM #703738
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]There is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.[/quote]
I always thought cheaper replacement developments such as serenity and montoro would go down into the 700k range, but they have really defied expectation. especially when these homes are absolutely so poorly constructed. but if you look in zillow, localguy is absolutely correct, these homes are finding buyers. a bunch of powerline view serenity homes actually went for $1 million earlier this year. (at the same time that some purchased much better Tiburon close outs for $1 million)
on the other hand, the replacement viscaya homes by city venture (the ones with minimal lots and slopes in back) did go into the mid-700k range. same thing with those davidson homes in late 08/early 09, 2-3 of them that had the same lot deficiencies also went for the mid-700k range.
this is why I wanted more specifics with kcal09. because some of what he “predicted” already happened, just not yet with serenity.
now if he is predicting fully loaded original resales from davidson, shea, and tiburon in the 700k, that would really be some way out on a limb prediction.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM #703886
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]There is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.[/quote]
I always thought cheaper replacement developments such as serenity and montoro would go down into the 700k range, but they have really defied expectation. especially when these homes are absolutely so poorly constructed. but if you look in zillow, localguy is absolutely correct, these homes are finding buyers. a bunch of powerline view serenity homes actually went for $1 million earlier this year. (at the same time that some purchased much better Tiburon close outs for $1 million)
on the other hand, the replacement viscaya homes by city venture (the ones with minimal lots and slopes in back) did go into the mid-700k range. same thing with those davidson homes in late 08/early 09, 2-3 of them that had the same lot deficiencies also went for the mid-700k range.
this is why I wanted more specifics with kcal09. because some of what he “predicted” already happened, just not yet with serenity.
now if he is predicting fully loaded original resales from davidson, shea, and tiburon in the 700k, that would really be some way out on a limb prediction.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM #704245
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]There is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.[/quote]
I always thought cheaper replacement developments such as serenity and montoro would go down into the 700k range, but they have really defied expectation. especially when these homes are absolutely so poorly constructed. but if you look in zillow, localguy is absolutely correct, these homes are finding buyers. a bunch of powerline view serenity homes actually went for $1 million earlier this year. (at the same time that some purchased much better Tiburon close outs for $1 million)
on the other hand, the replacement viscaya homes by city venture (the ones with minimal lots and slopes in back) did go into the mid-700k range. same thing with those davidson homes in late 08/early 09, 2-3 of them that had the same lot deficiencies also went for the mid-700k range.
this is why I wanted more specifics with kcal09. because some of what he “predicted” already happened, just not yet with serenity.
now if he is predicting fully loaded original resales from davidson, shea, and tiburon in the 700k, that would really be some way out on a limb prediction.
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM #702968
recordsclerk
ParticipantThere is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM #703559
recordsclerk
ParticipantThere is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM #703707
recordsclerk
ParticipantThere is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM #704066
recordsclerk
ParticipantThere is a remote chance that Serenity can drop to the high 700s. It will take more re-sale inventory like in the last 45 days. I just hope the listings keep coming. It also depends on what Toll Brother’s sells their homes for. They are having a VIP event on July 9 and will show the models for the first time. VIPs will have first pick at the lots released during this phase. I would assume the prices will be out that weekend also. I don’t see them undercutting Serenity in price, but the quality might be better for the same price.
-
June 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM #703111
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.
-
June 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM #703201
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.[/quote]
first, serenity is a post-bubble development, so financing for most of them would be the traditional 20% down or higher variety. and chances are most ended up getting very low 30 year interest rate.
second, like localguy mentioned on prior post, there is a market out there, homes are going. so if a house got all of the interior and exterior upgrades, it is more likely than not that it will find a buyer prior to reaching into the 700k territory. even well into 2013.
but is it possible that you might see maybe a couple of individual cases dip into the 700k range? maybe. maybe on a home that the owner could not afford to put upgrades in. and there’s a job loss. and the home already had a lot deficiency (aka minimal flat yard with steep slope in the back).
but then again, that has already happened with a couple of Davidson new homes and CityVenture Viscaya new homes. so whoever wanted a mid 700k larger Stonebridge home should have already acted. there’s no need to wait until 2013.
-
June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM #703381
recordsclerk
ParticipantAdd this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:08 PM #703386
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Add this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.[/quote]
“sits on a large corner lot near fabulous community park”
to me this seems like a big negative.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM #703598
recordsclerk
ParticipantNobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:42 AM #703613
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Nobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.[/quote]
are you sure nobody uses that park? If you have kids in the surrounding area you would know that park is heavily utilized by soccer leagues and little leagues all around. there’s very limited parking within the park, meaning large spillage on to the neighboring streets, and this house is affected more than any other.
regarding the Bella Rosa house, there’s a foreclosure asking for $750k. agree, sounds like delaying tactic.
-
June 15, 2011 at 11:42 AM #703699
localguy
ParticipantThe Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding. Back to the Almond Orchard house, good price, decent sized lot, huge hill, no view, park issue. In Scripps Preserve a house just sold for $936,000, small lot, no view, some upgrades. There are two more for sale, same exact plan, for over 1 million each. Of these two, one has small lot, no view, to many upgrades. While the other has decent sized lot, pool, no view, some upgrades. I was suprised that the $936,000 house sold for that much. I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.
-
June 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM #703709
familyguy
Participant[quote=localguy]The Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding…[/quote]
I would disagree very slightly with localguy. I pass by this park all the time and would say the times where where the parking is overflown into the street is cloer to about 5% of the time. Like localguy, I have also been there on beautiful days with my family and we were the only ones there. I would agree though, that for houses on the corner of Sycamore Trail and AOL (directly across from the park), the parking would be a disadvantage.
-
June 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM #703805
familyguy
Participant[quote=localguy]The Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding…[/quote]
I would disagree very slightly with localguy. I pass by this park all the time and would say the times where where the parking is overflown into the street is cloer to about 5% of the time. Like localguy, I have also been there on beautiful days with my family and we were the only ones there. I would agree though, that for houses on the corner of Sycamore Trail and AOL (directly across from the park), the parking would be a disadvantage.
-
June 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM #704395
familyguy
Participant[quote=localguy]The Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding…[/quote]
I would disagree very slightly with localguy. I pass by this park all the time and would say the times where where the parking is overflown into the street is cloer to about 5% of the time. Like localguy, I have also been there on beautiful days with my family and we were the only ones there. I would agree though, that for houses on the corner of Sycamore Trail and AOL (directly across from the park), the parking would be a disadvantage.
-
June 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM #704545
familyguy
Participant[quote=localguy]The Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding…[/quote]
I would disagree very slightly with localguy. I pass by this park all the time and would say the times where where the parking is overflown into the street is cloer to about 5% of the time. Like localguy, I have also been there on beautiful days with my family and we were the only ones there. I would agree though, that for houses on the corner of Sycamore Trail and AOL (directly across from the park), the parking would be a disadvantage.
-
June 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM #704903
familyguy
Participant[quote=localguy]The Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding…[/quote]
I would disagree very slightly with localguy. I pass by this park all the time and would say the times where where the parking is overflown into the street is cloer to about 5% of the time. Like localguy, I have also been there on beautiful days with my family and we were the only ones there. I would agree though, that for houses on the corner of Sycamore Trail and AOL (directly across from the park), the parking would be a disadvantage.
-
June 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM #703749
ocrenter
Participant[quote=localguy] I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.[/quote]
this is so true. I continue to be absolutely floored watching zillow and seeing folks paying $900k to $1 mil for the cheap monstrosities known as Montoro, or the very pedestrian Serenity. yet at the same time 3-4 other folks were able to walk into the Tiburon sales office and score true luxury class homes for the same $1 mil.
-
June 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM #703789
plm
ParticipantI think the problem was Cornerstone priced their Tiburon homes too high relative to the competition and they wouldn’t negotiate at all. Only when the homes were near completion did they drop the prices 80k which is when we bought. But it was really the better views from being up high that sold us.
-
June 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM #703885
plm
ParticipantI think the problem was Cornerstone priced their Tiburon homes too high relative to the competition and they wouldn’t negotiate at all. Only when the homes were near completion did they drop the prices 80k which is when we bought. But it was really the better views from being up high that sold us.
-
June 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM #704475
plm
ParticipantI think the problem was Cornerstone priced their Tiburon homes too high relative to the competition and they wouldn’t negotiate at all. Only when the homes were near completion did they drop the prices 80k which is when we bought. But it was really the better views from being up high that sold us.
-
June 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM #704625
plm
ParticipantI think the problem was Cornerstone priced their Tiburon homes too high relative to the competition and they wouldn’t negotiate at all. Only when the homes were near completion did they drop the prices 80k which is when we bought. But it was really the better views from being up high that sold us.
-
June 15, 2011 at 3:07 PM #704985
plm
ParticipantI think the problem was Cornerstone priced their Tiburon homes too high relative to the competition and they wouldn’t negotiate at all. Only when the homes were near completion did they drop the prices 80k which is when we bought. But it was really the better views from being up high that sold us.
-
June 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM #703845
ocrenter
Participant[quote=localguy] I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.[/quote]
this is so true. I continue to be absolutely floored watching zillow and seeing folks paying $900k to $1 mil for the cheap monstrosities known as Montoro, or the very pedestrian Serenity. yet at the same time 3-4 other folks were able to walk into the Tiburon sales office and score true luxury class homes for the same $1 mil.
-
June 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM #704436
ocrenter
Participant[quote=localguy] I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.[/quote]
this is so true. I continue to be absolutely floored watching zillow and seeing folks paying $900k to $1 mil for the cheap monstrosities known as Montoro, or the very pedestrian Serenity. yet at the same time 3-4 other folks were able to walk into the Tiburon sales office and score true luxury class homes for the same $1 mil.
-
June 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM #704585
ocrenter
Participant[quote=localguy] I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.[/quote]
this is so true. I continue to be absolutely floored watching zillow and seeing folks paying $900k to $1 mil for the cheap monstrosities known as Montoro, or the very pedestrian Serenity. yet at the same time 3-4 other folks were able to walk into the Tiburon sales office and score true luxury class homes for the same $1 mil.
-
June 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM #704944
ocrenter
Participant[quote=localguy] I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.[/quote]
this is so true. I continue to be absolutely floored watching zillow and seeing folks paying $900k to $1 mil for the cheap monstrosities known as Montoro, or the very pedestrian Serenity. yet at the same time 3-4 other folks were able to walk into the Tiburon sales office and score true luxury class homes for the same $1 mil.
-
June 15, 2011 at 11:42 AM #703795
localguy
ParticipantThe Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding. Back to the Almond Orchard house, good price, decent sized lot, huge hill, no view, park issue. In Scripps Preserve a house just sold for $936,000, small lot, no view, some upgrades. There are two more for sale, same exact plan, for over 1 million each. Of these two, one has small lot, no view, to many upgrades. While the other has decent sized lot, pool, no view, some upgrades. I was suprised that the $936,000 house sold for that much. I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.
-
June 15, 2011 at 11:42 AM #704385
localguy
ParticipantThe Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding. Back to the Almond Orchard house, good price, decent sized lot, huge hill, no view, park issue. In Scripps Preserve a house just sold for $936,000, small lot, no view, some upgrades. There are two more for sale, same exact plan, for over 1 million each. Of these two, one has small lot, no view, to many upgrades. While the other has decent sized lot, pool, no view, some upgrades. I was suprised that the $936,000 house sold for that much. I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.
-
June 15, 2011 at 11:42 AM #704535
localguy
ParticipantThe Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding. Back to the Almond Orchard house, good price, decent sized lot, huge hill, no view, park issue. In Scripps Preserve a house just sold for $936,000, small lot, no view, some upgrades. There are two more for sale, same exact plan, for over 1 million each. Of these two, one has small lot, no view, to many upgrades. While the other has decent sized lot, pool, no view, some upgrades. I was suprised that the $936,000 house sold for that much. I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.
-
June 15, 2011 at 11:42 AM #704893
localguy
ParticipantThe Stonebridge park is either fully packed or not a sole there. When it is packed on the weekends, cars are parking on Almond Orchard in front of the house previously mentioned. Little League, soccer, cricket, etc. it can get pretty hectic. It is like this maybe 25% of the time on weekends. The other 75% is wide open. We have been there numerous times and no one else is there, no kidding. Back to the Almond Orchard house, good price, decent sized lot, huge hill, no view, park issue. In Scripps Preserve a house just sold for $936,000, small lot, no view, some upgrades. There are two more for sale, same exact plan, for over 1 million each. Of these two, one has small lot, no view, to many upgrades. While the other has decent sized lot, pool, no view, some upgrades. I was suprised that the $936,000 house sold for that much. I will say it again, you need to pick wisely out here.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:42 AM #703710
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Nobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.[/quote]
are you sure nobody uses that park? If you have kids in the surrounding area you would know that park is heavily utilized by soccer leagues and little leagues all around. there’s very limited parking within the park, meaning large spillage on to the neighboring streets, and this house is affected more than any other.
regarding the Bella Rosa house, there’s a foreclosure asking for $750k. agree, sounds like delaying tactic.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:42 AM #704301
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Nobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.[/quote]
are you sure nobody uses that park? If you have kids in the surrounding area you would know that park is heavily utilized by soccer leagues and little leagues all around. there’s very limited parking within the park, meaning large spillage on to the neighboring streets, and this house is affected more than any other.
regarding the Bella Rosa house, there’s a foreclosure asking for $750k. agree, sounds like delaying tactic.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:42 AM #704450
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Nobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.[/quote]
are you sure nobody uses that park? If you have kids in the surrounding area you would know that park is heavily utilized by soccer leagues and little leagues all around. there’s very limited parking within the park, meaning large spillage on to the neighboring streets, and this house is affected more than any other.
regarding the Bella Rosa house, there’s a foreclosure asking for $750k. agree, sounds like delaying tactic.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:42 AM #704806
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Nobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.[/quote]
are you sure nobody uses that park? If you have kids in the surrounding area you would know that park is heavily utilized by soccer leagues and little leagues all around. there’s very limited parking within the park, meaning large spillage on to the neighboring streets, and this house is affected more than any other.
regarding the Bella Rosa house, there’s a foreclosure asking for $750k. agree, sounds like delaying tactic.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM #703695
recordsclerk
ParticipantNobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM #704286
recordsclerk
ParticipantNobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM #704435
recordsclerk
ParticipantNobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.
-
June 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM #704793
recordsclerk
ParticipantNobody ever uses that park. I think the worse thing about that lot is the slope, it’s huge. You would need to spend a lot on water and maintenance.
Here is another unrealistic listing. I don’t see the lender approving this sale:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110034644-13105_Bella_Rosa_Rd_San_Diego_CA_92131
That is a lot of new listings for the past couple of months. If this continues, you will see pressure on pricing. Up until now the demand has been far greater than supply. IMHO I don’t see the stream of listings continuing. It will probably taper off and trickle out like usual.
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:08 PM #703481
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Add this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.[/quote]
“sits on a large corner lot near fabulous community park”
to me this seems like a big negative.
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:08 PM #704073
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Add this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.[/quote]
“sits on a large corner lot near fabulous community park”
to me this seems like a big negative.
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:08 PM #704221
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Add this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.[/quote]
“sits on a large corner lot near fabulous community park”
to me this seems like a big negative.
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:08 PM #704581
ocrenter
Participant[quote=recordsclerk]Add this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.[/quote]
“sits on a large corner lot near fabulous community park”
to me this seems like a big negative.
-
June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM #703476
recordsclerk
ParticipantAdd this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.
-
June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM #704068
recordsclerk
ParticipantAdd this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.
-
June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM #704217
recordsclerk
ParticipantAdd this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.
-
June 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM #704576
recordsclerk
ParticipantAdd this to the 700K club by ColRich:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110012787-15054_Almond_Orchard_Lot_211_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Large usable lot, but large steep slope.
Obviously we are not counting Astoria and Mills Creek. They are always in the 700s.
So far the demand for these homes has kept the prices stable since 2009. I thought we would see more distress at this point.
-
June 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM #703298
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.[/quote]
first, serenity is a post-bubble development, so financing for most of them would be the traditional 20% down or higher variety. and chances are most ended up getting very low 30 year interest rate.
second, like localguy mentioned on prior post, there is a market out there, homes are going. so if a house got all of the interior and exterior upgrades, it is more likely than not that it will find a buyer prior to reaching into the 700k territory. even well into 2013.
but is it possible that you might see maybe a couple of individual cases dip into the 700k range? maybe. maybe on a home that the owner could not afford to put upgrades in. and there’s a job loss. and the home already had a lot deficiency (aka minimal flat yard with steep slope in the back).
but then again, that has already happened with a couple of Davidson new homes and CityVenture Viscaya new homes. so whoever wanted a mid 700k larger Stonebridge home should have already acted. there’s no need to wait until 2013.
-
June 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM #703888
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.[/quote]
first, serenity is a post-bubble development, so financing for most of them would be the traditional 20% down or higher variety. and chances are most ended up getting very low 30 year interest rate.
second, like localguy mentioned on prior post, there is a market out there, homes are going. so if a house got all of the interior and exterior upgrades, it is more likely than not that it will find a buyer prior to reaching into the 700k territory. even well into 2013.
but is it possible that you might see maybe a couple of individual cases dip into the 700k range? maybe. maybe on a home that the owner could not afford to put upgrades in. and there’s a job loss. and the home already had a lot deficiency (aka minimal flat yard with steep slope in the back).
but then again, that has already happened with a couple of Davidson new homes and CityVenture Viscaya new homes. so whoever wanted a mid 700k larger Stonebridge home should have already acted. there’s no need to wait until 2013.
-
June 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM #704036
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.[/quote]
first, serenity is a post-bubble development, so financing for most of them would be the traditional 20% down or higher variety. and chances are most ended up getting very low 30 year interest rate.
second, like localguy mentioned on prior post, there is a market out there, homes are going. so if a house got all of the interior and exterior upgrades, it is more likely than not that it will find a buyer prior to reaching into the 700k territory. even well into 2013.
but is it possible that you might see maybe a couple of individual cases dip into the 700k range? maybe. maybe on a home that the owner could not afford to put upgrades in. and there’s a job loss. and the home already had a lot deficiency (aka minimal flat yard with steep slope in the back).
but then again, that has already happened with a couple of Davidson new homes and CityVenture Viscaya new homes. so whoever wanted a mid 700k larger Stonebridge home should have already acted. there’s no need to wait until 2013.
-
June 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM #704396
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09][quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.[/quote]
first, serenity is a post-bubble development, so financing for most of them would be the traditional 20% down or higher variety. and chances are most ended up getting very low 30 year interest rate.
second, like localguy mentioned on prior post, there is a market out there, homes are going. so if a house got all of the interior and exterior upgrades, it is more likely than not that it will find a buyer prior to reaching into the 700k territory. even well into 2013.
but is it possible that you might see maybe a couple of individual cases dip into the 700k range? maybe. maybe on a home that the owner could not afford to put upgrades in. and there’s a job loss. and the home already had a lot deficiency (aka minimal flat yard with steep slope in the back).
but then again, that has already happened with a couple of Davidson new homes and CityVenture Viscaya new homes. so whoever wanted a mid 700k larger Stonebridge home should have already acted. there’s no need to wait until 2013.
-
June 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM #703208
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.
-
June 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM #703798
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.
-
June 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM #703946
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.
-
June 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM #704306
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?[/quote]
Resale of distressed homes.
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM #702958
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM #703549
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM #703697
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?
-
June 13, 2011 at 6:27 AM #704057
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]…the Serenity homes.[/quote]
new or resale?
-
June 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM #702953
kcal09
Participant…the Serenity homes.
-
June 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM #703544
kcal09
Participant…the Serenity homes.
-
June 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM #703692
kcal09
Participant…the Serenity homes.
-
June 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM #704052
kcal09
Participant…the Serenity homes.
-
June 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM #702948
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]I would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.[/quote]
which ones are you referring to re: $700k range? the smaller 3000ish homes on avg 8000 sqft lots or the 4-5000 sqft homes on avg 1/3-1/2 acre lots?
the smaller 3000ish homes are already in the 700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM #703539
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]I would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.[/quote]
which ones are you referring to re: $700k range? the smaller 3000ish homes on avg 8000 sqft lots or the 4-5000 sqft homes on avg 1/3-1/2 acre lots?
the smaller 3000ish homes are already in the 700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM #703687
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]I would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.[/quote]
which ones are you referring to re: $700k range? the smaller 3000ish homes on avg 8000 sqft lots or the 4-5000 sqft homes on avg 1/3-1/2 acre lots?
the smaller 3000ish homes are already in the 700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM #704047
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]I would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.[/quote]
which ones are you referring to re: $700k range? the smaller 3000ish homes on avg 8000 sqft lots or the 4-5000 sqft homes on avg 1/3-1/2 acre lots?
the smaller 3000ish homes are already in the 700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM #702903
kcal09
ParticipantI would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM #703495
kcal09
ParticipantI would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM #703642
kcal09
ParticipantI would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.
-
June 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM #704002
kcal09
ParticipantI would even say that the short sale prices will be lower as the overall market will deteriorate at a rapid pace from here. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see prices down another 10% in 2013. Stonebridge has not much to offer in terms of views or location and the MR are ridiculous. Those homes listed on the previous page should be really in the $700k range.
-
-
June 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM #702818
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]The way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.[/quote]
Depends on what you are refering to. The new home asking prices at the sales offices? Or the short sale asking price. You can’t get much better than the short sale prices, in fact those are actually a little unrealistic at this point. Definitely would not recommend any of the new home offerings at this point.
-
June 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM #703410
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]The way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.[/quote]
Depends on what you are refering to. The new home asking prices at the sales offices? Or the short sale asking price. You can’t get much better than the short sale prices, in fact those are actually a little unrealistic at this point. Definitely would not recommend any of the new home offerings at this point.
-
June 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM #703557
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]The way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.[/quote]
Depends on what you are refering to. The new home asking prices at the sales offices? Or the short sale asking price. You can’t get much better than the short sale prices, in fact those are actually a little unrealistic at this point. Definitely would not recommend any of the new home offerings at this point.
-
June 12, 2011 at 12:03 PM #703917
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]The way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.[/quote]
Depends on what you are refering to. The new home asking prices at the sales offices? Or the short sale asking price. You can’t get much better than the short sale prices, in fact those are actually a little unrealistic at this point. Definitely would not recommend any of the new home offerings at this point.
-
-
June 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM #702709
kcal09
ParticipantThe way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.
-
June 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM #703300
kcal09
ParticipantThe way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.
-
June 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM #703448
kcal09
ParticipantThe way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.
-
June 11, 2011 at 7:41 PM #703806
kcal09
ParticipantThe way the market is going the prices will be down at least another 10% by the end 2012. If you are patient you will get even better deals next year.
-
June 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM #702875
localguy
ParticipantWhat is interesting out here is that homes are selling. Brookfield/Serenity is plugging right along. Seperate from pricing, over/under, there is a demand. As always out here, although the majority of lots are above average in size, most are average for location, view, neighbors, etc. A small majority have nice views, huge yards, and few neighbors. It all depends on your preference. For example Montoro has huge lots, yet the houses are down in a “canyon”. While a few of the Serenity and Toll Bros. may have a smaller lot, yet have a decent view and few neighbors. ColRich, had a few homes next to the Tiburon models with really nice views at a decent price point. You really need to pay attention.
Localguy
Localguy -
June 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM #702973
localguy
ParticipantWhat is interesting out here is that homes are selling. Brookfield/Serenity is plugging right along. Seperate from pricing, over/under, there is a demand. As always out here, although the majority of lots are above average in size, most are average for location, view, neighbors, etc. A small majority have nice views, huge yards, and few neighbors. It all depends on your preference. For example Montoro has huge lots, yet the houses are down in a “canyon”. While a few of the Serenity and Toll Bros. may have a smaller lot, yet have a decent view and few neighbors. ColRich, had a few homes next to the Tiburon models with really nice views at a decent price point. You really need to pay attention.
Localguy
Localguy -
June 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM #703564
localguy
ParticipantWhat is interesting out here is that homes are selling. Brookfield/Serenity is plugging right along. Seperate from pricing, over/under, there is a demand. As always out here, although the majority of lots are above average in size, most are average for location, view, neighbors, etc. A small majority have nice views, huge yards, and few neighbors. It all depends on your preference. For example Montoro has huge lots, yet the houses are down in a “canyon”. While a few of the Serenity and Toll Bros. may have a smaller lot, yet have a decent view and few neighbors. ColRich, had a few homes next to the Tiburon models with really nice views at a decent price point. You really need to pay attention.
Localguy
Localguy -
June 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM #703712
localguy
ParticipantWhat is interesting out here is that homes are selling. Brookfield/Serenity is plugging right along. Seperate from pricing, over/under, there is a demand. As always out here, although the majority of lots are above average in size, most are average for location, view, neighbors, etc. A small majority have nice views, huge yards, and few neighbors. It all depends on your preference. For example Montoro has huge lots, yet the houses are down in a “canyon”. While a few of the Serenity and Toll Bros. may have a smaller lot, yet have a decent view and few neighbors. ColRich, had a few homes next to the Tiburon models with really nice views at a decent price point. You really need to pay attention.
Localguy
Localguy -
June 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM #704071
localguy
ParticipantWhat is interesting out here is that homes are selling. Brookfield/Serenity is plugging right along. Seperate from pricing, over/under, there is a demand. As always out here, although the majority of lots are above average in size, most are average for location, view, neighbors, etc. A small majority have nice views, huge yards, and few neighbors. It all depends on your preference. For example Montoro has huge lots, yet the houses are down in a “canyon”. While a few of the Serenity and Toll Bros. may have a smaller lot, yet have a decent view and few neighbors. ColRich, had a few homes next to the Tiburon models with really nice views at a decent price point. You really need to pay attention.
Localguy
Localguy -
June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM #703939
sunny88
ParticipantI think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:01 AM #704004
ocrenter
Participant[quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.
-
June 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM #706186
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.[/quote]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.
-
June 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM #706384
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM #706440
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.[/quote]
You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years!
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM #706445
sdrealtor
ParticipantSorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM #706490
kcal09
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Sorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead[/quote]
Interesting statement-perhaps I’ll send you a message in 30 years, if you’re still alive that is….
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM #706587
kcal09
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Sorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead[/quote]
Interesting statement-perhaps I’ll send you a message in 30 years, if you’re still alive that is….
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM #707187
kcal09
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Sorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead[/quote]
Interesting statement-perhaps I’ll send you a message in 30 years, if you’re still alive that is….
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM #707337
kcal09
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Sorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead[/quote]
Interesting statement-perhaps I’ll send you a message in 30 years, if you’re still alive that is….
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM #707700
kcal09
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Sorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead[/quote]
Interesting statement-perhaps I’ll send you a message in 30 years, if you’re still alive that is….
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM #706542
sdrealtor
ParticipantSorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM #707141
sdrealtor
ParticipantSorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM #707292
sdrealtor
ParticipantSorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM #707655
sdrealtor
ParticipantSorry but your reasoning is flawed. In 30 years you’ll be dead
-
June 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM #706455
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either. -
June 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM #706485
kcal09
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either.[/quote]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM #706495
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M. -
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM #706540
ocrenter
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M.[/quote]let’s not forget we have 30 years of inflation to look at. If the rate of inflation over the next 30 years is on pace with inflation from the last 30 years, that $450 per month in 30 years would really be $181 per month in today’s dollars.
and assuming someone paid 20% of 850k and financed the 80% at 4.5%, that $3450 per month mortgage after 30 years would be $1400 per month in today’s dollars.
all that really proves you do not take today’s monthly payment of something and extrapolate by 30 years. that was my point in the first place.
rather you compare apples to apples and simply ask the question of how the addition of $450 per month in mello roos impact a buyer’s purchase power here, today. and that impact IS a $82k loss in purchase power.
-
June 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM #706550
familyguy
ParticipantThis, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
Folks that are OK with it will justify it in their minds. Folks that don’t, won’t or can’t pay it will justify their reasons as well.
I think it just comes down to personal preference. For my family, it’s worth it. I enjoy the “new” neighborhood, the Poway school district, and all the other perks that come along with living in a new development. Others may not, and find comfort in the offerings of a more established neighborhood in Poway or the surrounding areas.
I wonder how many of those who have an issue with paying MR and justify their argument by calculating how much they will have in a 30 year period of investing, are actually investing the 5k per year that would have otherwise gone to pay MR? I’m sure there are many that do (and also sure those people will be quick to tell me how well their investments are doing) but I would suspect a greater majority of people spend that 5k they save by not paying MR on other things and will never see a penny of the money claimed to be generated from investing cash.
-
June 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM #706615
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy]This, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
[/quote]I just don’t see why this is so controversial. When someone buys a home, they simply figure the MR payment into their monthly housing cost. just like all other recurring monthly payments like HOA and property tax.
let’s take this South-of-Pomerado 4300 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100049824-10819_Figtree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.4 million, with HOA of $76 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $5600/month of mortgage, and $1240/month of HOA and tax. For total of $6840/month.meanwhile, compare to this Stonebridge 4700 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110019729-11364_Caspian_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.08 million, with HOA of $160 and MR of $440 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $4300/month of mortgage and $1500/month of HOA and tax and MR. For total of $5800/month.for a newer and slightly larger home, despite the MR, the monthly housing cost is actually $1000 less. (actually $1200 less per month if we apply the same down payment of $280k to the Stonebridge home).
that is all.
-
June 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM #706640
sdrealtor
ParticipantThere is actually more as at some point in the future the MR will be paid off and will go away.
-
June 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM #706738
sdrealtor
ParticipantThere is actually more as at some point in the future the MR will be paid off and will go away.
-
June 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM #707338
sdrealtor
ParticipantThere is actually more as at some point in the future the MR will be paid off and will go away.
-
June 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM #707487
sdrealtor
ParticipantThere is actually more as at some point in the future the MR will be paid off and will go away.
-
June 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM #707852
sdrealtor
ParticipantThere is actually more as at some point in the future the MR will be paid off and will go away.
-
June 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM #706713
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy]This, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
[/quote]I just don’t see why this is so controversial. When someone buys a home, they simply figure the MR payment into their monthly housing cost. just like all other recurring monthly payments like HOA and property tax.
let’s take this South-of-Pomerado 4300 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100049824-10819_Figtree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.4 million, with HOA of $76 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $5600/month of mortgage, and $1240/month of HOA and tax. For total of $6840/month.meanwhile, compare to this Stonebridge 4700 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110019729-11364_Caspian_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.08 million, with HOA of $160 and MR of $440 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $4300/month of mortgage and $1500/month of HOA and tax and MR. For total of $5800/month.for a newer and slightly larger home, despite the MR, the monthly housing cost is actually $1000 less. (actually $1200 less per month if we apply the same down payment of $280k to the Stonebridge home).
that is all.
-
June 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM #707313
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy]This, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
[/quote]I just don’t see why this is so controversial. When someone buys a home, they simply figure the MR payment into their monthly housing cost. just like all other recurring monthly payments like HOA and property tax.
let’s take this South-of-Pomerado 4300 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100049824-10819_Figtree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.4 million, with HOA of $76 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $5600/month of mortgage, and $1240/month of HOA and tax. For total of $6840/month.meanwhile, compare to this Stonebridge 4700 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110019729-11364_Caspian_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.08 million, with HOA of $160 and MR of $440 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $4300/month of mortgage and $1500/month of HOA and tax and MR. For total of $5800/month.for a newer and slightly larger home, despite the MR, the monthly housing cost is actually $1000 less. (actually $1200 less per month if we apply the same down payment of $280k to the Stonebridge home).
that is all.
-
June 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM #707462
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy]This, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
[/quote]I just don’t see why this is so controversial. When someone buys a home, they simply figure the MR payment into their monthly housing cost. just like all other recurring monthly payments like HOA and property tax.
let’s take this South-of-Pomerado 4300 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100049824-10819_Figtree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.4 million, with HOA of $76 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $5600/month of mortgage, and $1240/month of HOA and tax. For total of $6840/month.meanwhile, compare to this Stonebridge 4700 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110019729-11364_Caspian_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.08 million, with HOA of $160 and MR of $440 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $4300/month of mortgage and $1500/month of HOA and tax and MR. For total of $5800/month.for a newer and slightly larger home, despite the MR, the monthly housing cost is actually $1000 less. (actually $1200 less per month if we apply the same down payment of $280k to the Stonebridge home).
that is all.
-
June 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM #707827
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy]This, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
[/quote]I just don’t see why this is so controversial. When someone buys a home, they simply figure the MR payment into their monthly housing cost. just like all other recurring monthly payments like HOA and property tax.
let’s take this South-of-Pomerado 4300 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100049824-10819_Figtree_Ct_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.4 million, with HOA of $76 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $5600/month of mortgage, and $1240/month of HOA and tax. For total of $6840/month.meanwhile, compare to this Stonebridge 4700 sqft home on 12k lot. http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110019729-11364_Caspian_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92131
asking is $1.08 million, with HOA of $160 and MR of $440 per month. With 20% down, that works out to $4300/month of mortgage and $1500/month of HOA and tax and MR. For total of $5800/month.for a newer and slightly larger home, despite the MR, the monthly housing cost is actually $1000 less. (actually $1200 less per month if we apply the same down payment of $280k to the Stonebridge home).
that is all.
-
June 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM #706648
familyguy
ParticipantThis, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
Folks that are OK with it will justify it in their minds. Folks that don’t, won’t or can’t pay it will justify their reasons as well.
I think it just comes down to personal preference. For my family, it’s worth it. I enjoy the “new” neighborhood, the Poway school district, and all the other perks that come along with living in a new development. Others may not, and find comfort in the offerings of a more established neighborhood in Poway or the surrounding areas.
I wonder how many of those who have an issue with paying MR and justify their argument by calculating how much they will have in a 30 year period of investing, are actually investing the 5k per year that would have otherwise gone to pay MR? I’m sure there are many that do (and also sure those people will be quick to tell me how well their investments are doing) but I would suspect a greater majority of people spend that 5k they save by not paying MR on other things and will never see a penny of the money claimed to be generated from investing cash.
-
June 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM #707248
familyguy
ParticipantThis, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
Folks that are OK with it will justify it in their minds. Folks that don’t, won’t or can’t pay it will justify their reasons as well.
I think it just comes down to personal preference. For my family, it’s worth it. I enjoy the “new” neighborhood, the Poway school district, and all the other perks that come along with living in a new development. Others may not, and find comfort in the offerings of a more established neighborhood in Poway or the surrounding areas.
I wonder how many of those who have an issue with paying MR and justify their argument by calculating how much they will have in a 30 year period of investing, are actually investing the 5k per year that would have otherwise gone to pay MR? I’m sure there are many that do (and also sure those people will be quick to tell me how well their investments are doing) but I would suspect a greater majority of people spend that 5k they save by not paying MR on other things and will never see a penny of the money claimed to be generated from investing cash.
-
June 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM #707397
familyguy
ParticipantThis, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
Folks that are OK with it will justify it in their minds. Folks that don’t, won’t or can’t pay it will justify their reasons as well.
I think it just comes down to personal preference. For my family, it’s worth it. I enjoy the “new” neighborhood, the Poway school district, and all the other perks that come along with living in a new development. Others may not, and find comfort in the offerings of a more established neighborhood in Poway or the surrounding areas.
I wonder how many of those who have an issue with paying MR and justify their argument by calculating how much they will have in a 30 year period of investing, are actually investing the 5k per year that would have otherwise gone to pay MR? I’m sure there are many that do (and also sure those people will be quick to tell me how well their investments are doing) but I would suspect a greater majority of people spend that 5k they save by not paying MR on other things and will never see a penny of the money claimed to be generated from investing cash.
-
June 29, 2011 at 8:20 AM #707761
familyguy
ParticipantThis, (to pay MR or not to pay MR) like so many arguments, will never be settled.
Folks that are OK with it will justify it in their minds. Folks that don’t, won’t or can’t pay it will justify their reasons as well.
I think it just comes down to personal preference. For my family, it’s worth it. I enjoy the “new” neighborhood, the Poway school district, and all the other perks that come along with living in a new development. Others may not, and find comfort in the offerings of a more established neighborhood in Poway or the surrounding areas.
I wonder how many of those who have an issue with paying MR and justify their argument by calculating how much they will have in a 30 year period of investing, are actually investing the 5k per year that would have otherwise gone to pay MR? I’m sure there are many that do (and also sure those people will be quick to tell me how well their investments are doing) but I would suspect a greater majority of people spend that 5k they save by not paying MR on other things and will never see a penny of the money claimed to be generated from investing cash.
-
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM #706638
ocrenter
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M.[/quote]let’s not forget we have 30 years of inflation to look at. If the rate of inflation over the next 30 years is on pace with inflation from the last 30 years, that $450 per month in 30 years would really be $181 per month in today’s dollars.
and assuming someone paid 20% of 850k and financed the 80% at 4.5%, that $3450 per month mortgage after 30 years would be $1400 per month in today’s dollars.
all that really proves you do not take today’s monthly payment of something and extrapolate by 30 years. that was my point in the first place.
rather you compare apples to apples and simply ask the question of how the addition of $450 per month in mello roos impact a buyer’s purchase power here, today. and that impact IS a $82k loss in purchase power.
-
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM #707238
ocrenter
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M.[/quote]let’s not forget we have 30 years of inflation to look at. If the rate of inflation over the next 30 years is on pace with inflation from the last 30 years, that $450 per month in 30 years would really be $181 per month in today’s dollars.
and assuming someone paid 20% of 850k and financed the 80% at 4.5%, that $3450 per month mortgage after 30 years would be $1400 per month in today’s dollars.
all that really proves you do not take today’s monthly payment of something and extrapolate by 30 years. that was my point in the first place.
rather you compare apples to apples and simply ask the question of how the addition of $450 per month in mello roos impact a buyer’s purchase power here, today. and that impact IS a $82k loss in purchase power.
-
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM #707387
ocrenter
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M.[/quote]let’s not forget we have 30 years of inflation to look at. If the rate of inflation over the next 30 years is on pace with inflation from the last 30 years, that $450 per month in 30 years would really be $181 per month in today’s dollars.
and assuming someone paid 20% of 850k and financed the 80% at 4.5%, that $3450 per month mortgage after 30 years would be $1400 per month in today’s dollars.
all that really proves you do not take today’s monthly payment of something and extrapolate by 30 years. that was my point in the first place.
rather you compare apples to apples and simply ask the question of how the addition of $450 per month in mello roos impact a buyer’s purchase power here, today. and that impact IS a $82k loss in purchase power.
-
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM #707751
ocrenter
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M.[/quote]let’s not forget we have 30 years of inflation to look at. If the rate of inflation over the next 30 years is on pace with inflation from the last 30 years, that $450 per month in 30 years would really be $181 per month in today’s dollars.
and assuming someone paid 20% of 850k and financed the 80% at 4.5%, that $3450 per month mortgage after 30 years would be $1400 per month in today’s dollars.
all that really proves you do not take today’s monthly payment of something and extrapolate by 30 years. that was my point in the first place.
rather you compare apples to apples and simply ask the question of how the addition of $450 per month in mello roos impact a buyer’s purchase power here, today. and that impact IS a $82k loss in purchase power.
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM #706592
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M. -
June 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM #707192
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M. -
June 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM #707342
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M. -
June 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM #707705
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…[/quote]
Uhh… (unless I messed up my calculation)hope you know that if you bought it in cash for $850k, then you’re actually pay more than if you would have financed it over 30 years (assuming 6% return for your cash). $850k cash today, assuming 6% return will equal $5.1M in 30 years. The buyer of such $400k house really paid ~$770k. The $450/month in MR is $162k over 30 years. So $5.1M-$770k-$162k = ~$4.16M. -
June 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM #706582
kcal09
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either.[/quote]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM #707182
kcal09
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either.[/quote]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM #707332
kcal09
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either.[/quote]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…
-
June 28, 2011 at 11:41 PM #707695
kcal09
Participant[quote=AN][quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either.[/quote]That is absolutely correct. That’s why I bought my house in cash…
-
June 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM #706553
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either. -
June 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM #707151
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either. -
June 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM #707302
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either. -
June 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM #707665
an
Participant[quote=kcal09]You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years![/quote]
Using this same logic, buying these house for $850k and $450/month MR really cost you ~$3.4M compare to buying a $400k house and invest the $110k difference in down payment and $2700/month in monthly payment. That hasn’t count in the tax difference either. -
June 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM #706537
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.[/quote]
You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years!
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM #707136
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.[/quote]
You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years!
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM #707287
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.[/quote]
You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years!
-
June 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM #707650
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.[/quote]
You’re reasoning is flawed. If I invested the MR of $450 per month in stocks and mutual funds with an average yield of 6% I’ll have $454,700 at the end of the 30 years!
-
June 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM #706483
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.
-
June 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM #707080
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.
-
June 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM #707232
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.
-
June 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM #707595
ocrenter
Participant[quote=kcal09]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.[/quote]that’s like saying a house with a $500k 30 year mortgage really cost $911k.
the way I look at it is how much the mello roos burden reduce purchase power.
a $5000 per year mello roos is $416 per month. $82k at interest rate of 4.5% yields $416 per month. Therefore, by purchasing a house with $416 per month of mello roos, you lose $82k in purchase power.
Therefore, a similar sized home on a similar sized lot in neighboring Poway with a purchase price that is higher in price by less than $82k is actually a better bargain.
I ended up rounding up the $82k to $100k. But I personally can’t seem to find a comparable Poway home that fits that criteria.
That is ultimately why localguy continue to see demand in Stonebridge, because comparatively, it is a better deal despite the MR.
-
June 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM #706283
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.[/quote]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.
-
June 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM #706882
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.[/quote]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.
-
June 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM #707032
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.[/quote]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.
-
June 27, 2011 at 2:26 PM #707396
kcal09
Participant[quote=ocrenter][quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.[/quote]
MR is a 30 year bond which would add 30 x $5,000=$150,000 total.
-
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:01 AM #704099
ocrenter
Participant[quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:01 AM #704689
ocrenter
Participant[quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:01 AM #704840
ocrenter
Participant[quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.
-
June 16, 2011 at 6:01 AM #705201
ocrenter
Participant[quote=sunny88]I think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.[/quote]
I just did the calculation, the MR actually adds $100k to the price. Would be nice to see a recent closed sale that is much nicer in Poway for 100k over a comparable Stonebridge home.
-
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM #704035
sunny88
ParticipantI think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM #704624
sunny88
ParticipantI think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM #704775
sunny88
ParticipantI think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM #705136
sunny88
ParticipantI think that the high MR still deters many buyers from buying at Stonebridge. The MR adds at least another $150k to the home prices and for that price you can buy a much nicer home in Poway.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #703949
kcal09
ParticipantI disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.
-
June 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM #704716
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
HI. I concur. If you look for 4000-5000 sqft houses in Poway or scripps ranch you are looking at 1.3 mil for a 20 year old house. After actively following this market as a buyer for 2 years I think it is safe to say those short sale prices should be completely ignored. The ones in the vicinity of Serenity have been under contract and denied many times over at the prices they are listed at as short sales.
Of course you would buy a home already landscaped with a pool for the same price as a new construction without the 200k in extras that costs but like all things to good to be true the banks holding these notes aren’t allowing short sales 400k under what the owners owe.
If you want a pool sized lot, a house 4000 sqft or larger, a view and a neighborhood with neighbors close buy (if you have small children) its really the only place to look and buy. And people are buying them. The only steep discounts in to the 800’s are on properties with no view and limited yards with hilltop in the backyard. This makes sense to me as everyone buys the view lots first.
Hope this helps clarify the interest in the development. Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM #704834
familyguy
Participant[quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM #704844
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Not as far as i know. But Brookfield was supposed to build on it and they sold it to someone else. So id imagine someone else has plans to get on with it sooner rather than later.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM #704940
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Not as far as i know. But Brookfield was supposed to build on it and they sold it to someone else. So id imagine someone else has plans to get on with it sooner rather than later.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM #705535
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Not as far as i know. But Brookfield was supposed to build on it and they sold it to someone else. So id imagine someone else has plans to get on with it sooner rather than later.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM #705685
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Not as far as i know. But Brookfield was supposed to build on it and they sold it to someone else. So id imagine someone else has plans to get on with it sooner rather than later.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM #706049
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Not as far as i know. But Brookfield was supposed to build on it and they sold it to someone else. So id imagine someone else has plans to get on with it sooner rather than later.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM #705068
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Brookfield sold the Viewpoint lots? did it just happen? property tax roll still shows Brookfield.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM #705165
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Brookfield sold the Viewpoint lots? did it just happen? property tax roll still shows Brookfield.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM #705760
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Brookfield sold the Viewpoint lots? did it just happen? property tax roll still shows Brookfield.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM #705911
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Brookfield sold the Viewpoint lots? did it just happen? property tax roll still shows Brookfield.
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:48 PM #706275
ocrenter
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”[/quote]
Brookfield sold the Viewpoint lots? did it just happen? property tax roll still shows Brookfield.
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM #704930
familyguy
Participant[quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM #705525
familyguy
Participant[quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM #705676
familyguy
Participant[quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM #706038
familyguy
Participant[quote=bluehairdave][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.[/quote]
Is construction finally planned for those lots in “Viewpoint?”
-
-
June 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM #704808
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
HI. I concur. If you look for 4000-5000 sqft houses in Poway or scripps ranch you are looking at 1.3 mil for a 20 year old house. After actively following this market as a buyer for 2 years I think it is safe to say those short sale prices should be completely ignored. The ones in the vicinity of Serenity have been under contract and denied many times over at the prices they are listed at as short sales.
Of course you would buy a home already landscaped with a pool for the same price as a new construction without the 200k in extras that costs but like all things to good to be true the banks holding these notes aren’t allowing short sales 400k under what the owners owe.
If you want a pool sized lot, a house 4000 sqft or larger, a view and a neighborhood with neighbors close buy (if you have small children) its really the only place to look and buy. And people are buying them. The only steep discounts in to the 800’s are on properties with no view and limited yards with hilltop in the backyard. This makes sense to me as everyone buys the view lots first.
Hope this helps clarify the interest in the development. Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.
-
June 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM #705404
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
HI. I concur. If you look for 4000-5000 sqft houses in Poway or scripps ranch you are looking at 1.3 mil for a 20 year old house. After actively following this market as a buyer for 2 years I think it is safe to say those short sale prices should be completely ignored. The ones in the vicinity of Serenity have been under contract and denied many times over at the prices they are listed at as short sales.
Of course you would buy a home already landscaped with a pool for the same price as a new construction without the 200k in extras that costs but like all things to good to be true the banks holding these notes aren’t allowing short sales 400k under what the owners owe.
If you want a pool sized lot, a house 4000 sqft or larger, a view and a neighborhood with neighbors close buy (if you have small children) its really the only place to look and buy. And people are buying them. The only steep discounts in to the 800’s are on properties with no view and limited yards with hilltop in the backyard. This makes sense to me as everyone buys the view lots first.
Hope this helps clarify the interest in the development. Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.
-
June 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM #705555
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
HI. I concur. If you look for 4000-5000 sqft houses in Poway or scripps ranch you are looking at 1.3 mil for a 20 year old house. After actively following this market as a buyer for 2 years I think it is safe to say those short sale prices should be completely ignored. The ones in the vicinity of Serenity have been under contract and denied many times over at the prices they are listed at as short sales.
Of course you would buy a home already landscaped with a pool for the same price as a new construction without the 200k in extras that costs but like all things to good to be true the banks holding these notes aren’t allowing short sales 400k under what the owners owe.
If you want a pool sized lot, a house 4000 sqft or larger, a view and a neighborhood with neighbors close buy (if you have small children) its really the only place to look and buy. And people are buying them. The only steep discounts in to the 800’s are on properties with no view and limited yards with hilltop in the backyard. This makes sense to me as everyone buys the view lots first.
Hope this helps clarify the interest in the development. Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.
-
June 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM #705917
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
HI. I concur. If you look for 4000-5000 sqft houses in Poway or scripps ranch you are looking at 1.3 mil for a 20 year old house. After actively following this market as a buyer for 2 years I think it is safe to say those short sale prices should be completely ignored. The ones in the vicinity of Serenity have been under contract and denied many times over at the prices they are listed at as short sales.
Of course you would buy a home already landscaped with a pool for the same price as a new construction without the 200k in extras that costs but like all things to good to be true the banks holding these notes aren’t allowing short sales 400k under what the owners owe.
If you want a pool sized lot, a house 4000 sqft or larger, a view and a neighborhood with neighbors close buy (if you have small children) its really the only place to look and buy. And people are buying them. The only steep discounts in to the 800’s are on properties with no view and limited yards with hilltop in the backyard. This makes sense to me as everyone buys the view lots first.
Hope this helps clarify the interest in the development. Im curious to see what Toll Bros. has as well at the ViewPoint that Brookfield recently sold.
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM #704839
familyguy
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM #704849
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
As a family looking in the area we didnt like 1. that it was so close to the park that on weekends you have foot traffic and cars parked up and down the street. 2. The backyards are much smaller than what Serenity is now selling. 3. Why not spend 100k less and build out the home customized to what you want for a slightly smaller home. For us anything over 4500 sq ft would be overkill. 4k sqft is enough for any family short of the Brady Bunch for the most part. Builders in Stonebridge are offering enough in ‘incentives’ that you can pimp out the place on the inside within the sales price. The landscaping is another story..
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM #705044
Anonymous
GuestAs someone who reads forum quite frequently and actually lives in this neighborhood, I felt compelled to contribute to this discussion.
Yes, the backyards are smaller along that side of the street. However, the tradeoff among the owners that live there is that they are afforded a very substantial 180 degree, panoramic sunset views to the west, northwest (sometimes, on clear days a sliver of ocean as well). And because of their siting, they also receive a near daily, cooling, gentle ocean breeze.
To each their own but the thinking for most of the owners here is that they love this neighborhood and accepted the yard size for the other qualities above and for not having to landscape, maintain and spend $$$ on a large lot when there is exactly a park within walking distance.
And I would respectively disagree with the above statement about cars parked up and down the street on weekends. Again as someone that actually lives in this neighborhood, I have noticed this happen exactly twice in the last year when there were soccer or baseball tournaments occurring. Most of the time, it is neighborhood kids walking or biking to the park or neighbors out walking their dogs….which one would think is what exactly defines just that, a neighborhood rather than isolationist “foot traffic.”
Landscaping, yes, is the other story. Would definitely look into the value of already installed, good landscaping….
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM #705139
Anonymous
GuestAs someone who reads forum quite frequently and actually lives in this neighborhood, I felt compelled to contribute to this discussion.
Yes, the backyards are smaller along that side of the street. However, the tradeoff among the owners that live there is that they are afforded a very substantial 180 degree, panoramic sunset views to the west, northwest (sometimes, on clear days a sliver of ocean as well). And because of their siting, they also receive a near daily, cooling, gentle ocean breeze.
To each their own but the thinking for most of the owners here is that they love this neighborhood and accepted the yard size for the other qualities above and for not having to landscape, maintain and spend $$$ on a large lot when there is exactly a park within walking distance.
And I would respectively disagree with the above statement about cars parked up and down the street on weekends. Again as someone that actually lives in this neighborhood, I have noticed this happen exactly twice in the last year when there were soccer or baseball tournaments occurring. Most of the time, it is neighborhood kids walking or biking to the park or neighbors out walking their dogs….which one would think is what exactly defines just that, a neighborhood rather than isolationist “foot traffic.”
Landscaping, yes, is the other story. Would definitely look into the value of already installed, good landscaping….
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM #705735
Anonymous
GuestAs someone who reads forum quite frequently and actually lives in this neighborhood, I felt compelled to contribute to this discussion.
Yes, the backyards are smaller along that side of the street. However, the tradeoff among the owners that live there is that they are afforded a very substantial 180 degree, panoramic sunset views to the west, northwest (sometimes, on clear days a sliver of ocean as well). And because of their siting, they also receive a near daily, cooling, gentle ocean breeze.
To each their own but the thinking for most of the owners here is that they love this neighborhood and accepted the yard size for the other qualities above and for not having to landscape, maintain and spend $$$ on a large lot when there is exactly a park within walking distance.
And I would respectively disagree with the above statement about cars parked up and down the street on weekends. Again as someone that actually lives in this neighborhood, I have noticed this happen exactly twice in the last year when there were soccer or baseball tournaments occurring. Most of the time, it is neighborhood kids walking or biking to the park or neighbors out walking their dogs….which one would think is what exactly defines just that, a neighborhood rather than isolationist “foot traffic.”
Landscaping, yes, is the other story. Would definitely look into the value of already installed, good landscaping….
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM #705886
Anonymous
GuestAs someone who reads forum quite frequently and actually lives in this neighborhood, I felt compelled to contribute to this discussion.
Yes, the backyards are smaller along that side of the street. However, the tradeoff among the owners that live there is that they are afforded a very substantial 180 degree, panoramic sunset views to the west, northwest (sometimes, on clear days a sliver of ocean as well). And because of their siting, they also receive a near daily, cooling, gentle ocean breeze.
To each their own but the thinking for most of the owners here is that they love this neighborhood and accepted the yard size for the other qualities above and for not having to landscape, maintain and spend $$$ on a large lot when there is exactly a park within walking distance.
And I would respectively disagree with the above statement about cars parked up and down the street on weekends. Again as someone that actually lives in this neighborhood, I have noticed this happen exactly twice in the last year when there were soccer or baseball tournaments occurring. Most of the time, it is neighborhood kids walking or biking to the park or neighbors out walking their dogs….which one would think is what exactly defines just that, a neighborhood rather than isolationist “foot traffic.”
Landscaping, yes, is the other story. Would definitely look into the value of already installed, good landscaping….
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM #706250
Anonymous
GuestAs someone who reads forum quite frequently and actually lives in this neighborhood, I felt compelled to contribute to this discussion.
Yes, the backyards are smaller along that side of the street. However, the tradeoff among the owners that live there is that they are afforded a very substantial 180 degree, panoramic sunset views to the west, northwest (sometimes, on clear days a sliver of ocean as well). And because of their siting, they also receive a near daily, cooling, gentle ocean breeze.
To each their own but the thinking for most of the owners here is that they love this neighborhood and accepted the yard size for the other qualities above and for not having to landscape, maintain and spend $$$ on a large lot when there is exactly a park within walking distance.
And I would respectively disagree with the above statement about cars parked up and down the street on weekends. Again as someone that actually lives in this neighborhood, I have noticed this happen exactly twice in the last year when there were soccer or baseball tournaments occurring. Most of the time, it is neighborhood kids walking or biking to the park or neighbors out walking their dogs….which one would think is what exactly defines just that, a neighborhood rather than isolationist “foot traffic.”
Landscaping, yes, is the other story. Would definitely look into the value of already installed, good landscaping….
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM #704945
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
As a family looking in the area we didnt like 1. that it was so close to the park that on weekends you have foot traffic and cars parked up and down the street. 2. The backyards are much smaller than what Serenity is now selling. 3. Why not spend 100k less and build out the home customized to what you want for a slightly smaller home. For us anything over 4500 sq ft would be overkill. 4k sqft is enough for any family short of the Brady Bunch for the most part. Builders in Stonebridge are offering enough in ‘incentives’ that you can pimp out the place on the inside within the sales price. The landscaping is another story..
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM #705540
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
As a family looking in the area we didnt like 1. that it was so close to the park that on weekends you have foot traffic and cars parked up and down the street. 2. The backyards are much smaller than what Serenity is now selling. 3. Why not spend 100k less and build out the home customized to what you want for a slightly smaller home. For us anything over 4500 sq ft would be overkill. 4k sqft is enough for any family short of the Brady Bunch for the most part. Builders in Stonebridge are offering enough in ‘incentives’ that you can pimp out the place on the inside within the sales price. The landscaping is another story..
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM #705690
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
As a family looking in the area we didnt like 1. that it was so close to the park that on weekends you have foot traffic and cars parked up and down the street. 2. The backyards are much smaller than what Serenity is now selling. 3. Why not spend 100k less and build out the home customized to what you want for a slightly smaller home. For us anything over 4500 sq ft would be overkill. 4k sqft is enough for any family short of the Brady Bunch for the most part. Builders in Stonebridge are offering enough in ‘incentives’ that you can pimp out the place on the inside within the sales price. The landscaping is another story..
-
June 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM #706053
bluehairdave
Participant[quote=familyguy][quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131%5B/quote%5D
As a family looking in the area we didnt like 1. that it was so close to the park that on weekends you have foot traffic and cars parked up and down the street. 2. The backyards are much smaller than what Serenity is now selling. 3. Why not spend 100k less and build out the home customized to what you want for a slightly smaller home. For us anything over 4500 sq ft would be overkill. 4k sqft is enough for any family short of the Brady Bunch for the most part. Builders in Stonebridge are offering enough in ‘incentives’ that you can pimp out the place on the inside within the sales price. The landscaping is another story..
-
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM #704935
familyguy
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM #705530
familyguy
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM #705680
familyguy
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
June 20, 2011 at 7:15 AM #706044
familyguy
Participant[quote=kcal09]I disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.[/quote]
I tend to agree with you kcal, makes me wonder how this listing has lasted so long on the market. Anyone have any thoughts as to why it hasn’t sold?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110025247-15069_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
Of course, there is this one that is only a few doors down. It seems to go on and off the market quite often, yet there has never been a sign in the front yard so without looking online no one would ever know it was for sale. What would be the point of not putting a sign out?
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110028285-15080_Almond_Orchard_Ln_San_Diego_CA_92131
-
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #704045
kcal09
ParticipantI disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #704634
kcal09
ParticipantI disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #704786
kcal09
ParticipantI disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.
-
June 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #705146
kcal09
ParticipantI disagree, I think many people are happy to pay the MR to get a large new home. Poway does not have new homes except when you go up the mountain on Eastvale.
-
June 21, 2011 at 7:36 AM #705163
localguy
Participant
-