Home › Forums › Housing › Dick Bove: Housing Market Will Fall 10%-15% When Fed Stops Subsidizing Home Prices
- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2010 at 9:53 PM #17233March 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM #528126
jpinpb
ParticipantBut will the government really step to the side or is some other scheme up their sleeves. As much as I agree w/what Bove is saying and Meredith Whitney, the wild card the government holds will influence what will happen. Fanny and Freddie are picking up the slack. Maybe the Fed can really pull back. March 31st is the end date, but we’re looking at June for what’s in the system already to work its way through. He qualifies his 15 to 20% by saying he doubts we’ll ever get a free market. Unfortunately, the government has invested so much into this already. If they abandon ship now, all the cargo of money is going down w/it.
March 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM #528258jpinpb
ParticipantBut will the government really step to the side or is some other scheme up their sleeves. As much as I agree w/what Bove is saying and Meredith Whitney, the wild card the government holds will influence what will happen. Fanny and Freddie are picking up the slack. Maybe the Fed can really pull back. March 31st is the end date, but we’re looking at June for what’s in the system already to work its way through. He qualifies his 15 to 20% by saying he doubts we’ll ever get a free market. Unfortunately, the government has invested so much into this already. If they abandon ship now, all the cargo of money is going down w/it.
March 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM #528707jpinpb
ParticipantBut will the government really step to the side or is some other scheme up their sleeves. As much as I agree w/what Bove is saying and Meredith Whitney, the wild card the government holds will influence what will happen. Fanny and Freddie are picking up the slack. Maybe the Fed can really pull back. March 31st is the end date, but we’re looking at June for what’s in the system already to work its way through. He qualifies his 15 to 20% by saying he doubts we’ll ever get a free market. Unfortunately, the government has invested so much into this already. If they abandon ship now, all the cargo of money is going down w/it.
March 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM #528803jpinpb
ParticipantBut will the government really step to the side or is some other scheme up their sleeves. As much as I agree w/what Bove is saying and Meredith Whitney, the wild card the government holds will influence what will happen. Fanny and Freddie are picking up the slack. Maybe the Fed can really pull back. March 31st is the end date, but we’re looking at June for what’s in the system already to work its way through. He qualifies his 15 to 20% by saying he doubts we’ll ever get a free market. Unfortunately, the government has invested so much into this already. If they abandon ship now, all the cargo of money is going down w/it.
March 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM #529063jpinpb
ParticipantBut will the government really step to the side or is some other scheme up their sleeves. As much as I agree w/what Bove is saying and Meredith Whitney, the wild card the government holds will influence what will happen. Fanny and Freddie are picking up the slack. Maybe the Fed can really pull back. March 31st is the end date, but we’re looking at June for what’s in the system already to work its way through. He qualifies his 15 to 20% by saying he doubts we’ll ever get a free market. Unfortunately, the government has invested so much into this already. If they abandon ship now, all the cargo of money is going down w/it.
March 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM #528206pencilneck
ParticipantIf history is any guide (especially recent history), government intervention occurs after the crisis rather than before.
A lot of the government support is scheduled to end over the short term (1-2 years). I think they will wait until the housing market starts dropping again, Then they will be totally free to enacting another emergency measure that modestly helps to re-stabilize the housing market while, coincidentally, making a few well connected people and corporations very wealthy in the process.
Its just a lot easier to do this during a crises rather than beforehand.
March 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM #528338pencilneck
ParticipantIf history is any guide (especially recent history), government intervention occurs after the crisis rather than before.
A lot of the government support is scheduled to end over the short term (1-2 years). I think they will wait until the housing market starts dropping again, Then they will be totally free to enacting another emergency measure that modestly helps to re-stabilize the housing market while, coincidentally, making a few well connected people and corporations very wealthy in the process.
Its just a lot easier to do this during a crises rather than beforehand.
March 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM #528787pencilneck
ParticipantIf history is any guide (especially recent history), government intervention occurs after the crisis rather than before.
A lot of the government support is scheduled to end over the short term (1-2 years). I think they will wait until the housing market starts dropping again, Then they will be totally free to enacting another emergency measure that modestly helps to re-stabilize the housing market while, coincidentally, making a few well connected people and corporations very wealthy in the process.
Its just a lot easier to do this during a crises rather than beforehand.
March 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM #528883pencilneck
ParticipantIf history is any guide (especially recent history), government intervention occurs after the crisis rather than before.
A lot of the government support is scheduled to end over the short term (1-2 years). I think they will wait until the housing market starts dropping again, Then they will be totally free to enacting another emergency measure that modestly helps to re-stabilize the housing market while, coincidentally, making a few well connected people and corporations very wealthy in the process.
Its just a lot easier to do this during a crises rather than beforehand.
March 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM #529143pencilneck
ParticipantIf history is any guide (especially recent history), government intervention occurs after the crisis rather than before.
A lot of the government support is scheduled to end over the short term (1-2 years). I think they will wait until the housing market starts dropping again, Then they will be totally free to enacting another emergency measure that modestly helps to re-stabilize the housing market while, coincidentally, making a few well connected people and corporations very wealthy in the process.
Its just a lot easier to do this during a crises rather than beforehand.
March 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM #528216davelj
ParticipantI agree with Bove that there’s a high likelihood that prices will revisit the prior trough – which is about 10%-15% below where we are now. With slightly higher interest rates, reduced incentives and more foreclosures hitting the market, that seems logical.
But… I agree with other posters that – in so many words – the Officialdom has drawn a valuation line in the sand somewhere around the long-term trend valuations (which, again, are about where the trough was reached last year). So, we may fall off a bit from here, but if prices fall 10% or so, expect to see new incentives, etc. in an effort to spur demand to suck up all of the foreclosures.
That’s the will of the majority. Learn to love it.
March 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM #528348davelj
ParticipantI agree with Bove that there’s a high likelihood that prices will revisit the prior trough – which is about 10%-15% below where we are now. With slightly higher interest rates, reduced incentives and more foreclosures hitting the market, that seems logical.
But… I agree with other posters that – in so many words – the Officialdom has drawn a valuation line in the sand somewhere around the long-term trend valuations (which, again, are about where the trough was reached last year). So, we may fall off a bit from here, but if prices fall 10% or so, expect to see new incentives, etc. in an effort to spur demand to suck up all of the foreclosures.
That’s the will of the majority. Learn to love it.
March 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM #528797davelj
ParticipantI agree with Bove that there’s a high likelihood that prices will revisit the prior trough – which is about 10%-15% below where we are now. With slightly higher interest rates, reduced incentives and more foreclosures hitting the market, that seems logical.
But… I agree with other posters that – in so many words – the Officialdom has drawn a valuation line in the sand somewhere around the long-term trend valuations (which, again, are about where the trough was reached last year). So, we may fall off a bit from here, but if prices fall 10% or so, expect to see new incentives, etc. in an effort to spur demand to suck up all of the foreclosures.
That’s the will of the majority. Learn to love it.
March 20, 2010 at 11:08 AM #528893davelj
ParticipantI agree with Bove that there’s a high likelihood that prices will revisit the prior trough – which is about 10%-15% below where we are now. With slightly higher interest rates, reduced incentives and more foreclosures hitting the market, that seems logical.
But… I agree with other posters that – in so many words – the Officialdom has drawn a valuation line in the sand somewhere around the long-term trend valuations (which, again, are about where the trough was reached last year). So, we may fall off a bit from here, but if prices fall 10% or so, expect to see new incentives, etc. in an effort to spur demand to suck up all of the foreclosures.
That’s the will of the majority. Learn to love it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.