DC Attorney General May have Just Banned MERS Mortgages

[Zeitgeist]

Negligence-“(a) a legal duty to use due care; (b) a breach of such legal duty; (c) the breach as the proximate or legal cause of the resulting injury. [Citations.]” (6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (9th ed. 1988) Torts, § 732, p. 60.)

And possibly unfair business practices through the Commerce clause.

Just my two cents.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Fighting MERS in CA]MERS Fatal Flaws‬ in California . . .

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/MERS-Fatal-Flaws
[/quote]

Indeed, I will be perusing this site for “cites” (as time permits) to examine on why MERS assignment of CA trust deeds (and their underlying notes) could be illegal.

I have, over the last few years, counseled several borrowers NOT to go thru mortgage brokers and (unwittingly) sign their trust deeds over to MERS, but to no avail. This practice is still going on today.

The ramifications ARE truly scary, but could prove to be “real.” For the life of me, I don’t know how these “casual” assignments were permitted in the first place!

I’m not saying here that the beneficiary amounts shown on the the affected trust deeds are bogus. What I’m saying is that the documents filed with County Recorders could be too sloppy and incongruent to legally foreclose on the underlying collateral (the defaulted properties).

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Fighting MERS in CA]MERS Fatal Flaws‬ in California . . .

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/MERS-Fatal-Flaws
[/quote]

Indeed, I will be perusing this site for “cites” (as time permits) to examine on why MERS assignment of CA trust deeds (and their underlying notes) could be illegal.

I have, over the last few years, counseled several borrowers NOT to go thru mortgage brokers and (unwittingly) sign their trust deeds over to MERS, but to no avail. This practice is still going on today.

The ramifications ARE truly scary, but could prove to be “real.” For the life of me, I don’t know how these “casual” assignments were permitted in the first place!

I’m not saying here that the beneficiary amounts shown on the the affected trust deeds are bogus. What I’m saying is that the documents filed with County Recorders could be too sloppy and incongruent to legally foreclose on the underlying collateral (the defaulted properties).

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Fighting MERS in CA]MERS Fatal Flaws‬ in California . . .

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/MERS-Fatal-Flaws
[/quote]

Indeed, I will be perusing this site for “cites” (as time permits) to examine on why MERS assignment of CA trust deeds (and their underlying notes) could be illegal.

I have, over the last few years, counseled several borrowers NOT to go thru mortgage brokers and (unwittingly) sign their trust deeds over to MERS, but to no avail. This practice is still going on today.

The ramifications ARE truly scary, but could prove to be “real.” For the life of me, I don’t know how these “casual” assignments were permitted in the first place!

I’m not saying here that the beneficiary amounts shown on the the affected trust deeds are bogus. What I’m saying is that the documents filed with County Recorders could be too sloppy and incongruent to legally foreclose on the underlying collateral (the defaulted properties).

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Fighting MERS in CA]MERS Fatal Flaws‬ in California . . .

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/MERS-Fatal-Flaws
[/quote]

Indeed, I will be perusing this site for “cites” (as time permits) to examine on why MERS assignment of CA trust deeds (and their underlying notes) could be illegal.

I have, over the last few years, counseled several borrowers NOT to go thru mortgage brokers and (unwittingly) sign their trust deeds over to MERS, but to no avail. This practice is still going on today.

The ramifications ARE truly scary, but could prove to be “real.” For the life of me, I don’t know how these “casual” assignments were permitted in the first place!

I’m not saying here that the beneficiary amounts shown on the the affected trust deeds are bogus. What I’m saying is that the documents filed with County Recorders could be too sloppy and incongruent to legally foreclose on the underlying collateral (the defaulted properties).

[bearishgurl]

[quote=Fighting MERS in CA]MERS Fatal Flaws‬ in California . . .

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/MERS-Fatal-Flaws
[/quote]

Indeed, I will be perusing this site for “cites” (as time permits) to examine on why MERS assignment of CA trust deeds (and their underlying notes) could be illegal.

I have, over the last few years, counseled several borrowers NOT to go thru mortgage brokers and (unwittingly) sign their trust deeds over to MERS, but to no avail. This practice is still going on today.

The ramifications ARE truly scary, but could prove to be “real.” For the life of me, I don’t know how these “casual” assignments were permitted in the first place!

I’m not saying here that the beneficiary amounts shown on the the affected trust deeds are bogus. What I’m saying is that the documents filed with County Recorders could be too sloppy and incongruent to legally foreclose on the underlying collateral (the defaulted properties).

[Author]

Posts