Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › City Venture at it again
- This topic has 70 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by
ocrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM #722713August 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM #721889
profhoff
ParticipantIsn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
August 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM #721983profhoff
ParticipantIsn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
August 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM #723103profhoff
ParticipantIsn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
August 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM #722581profhoff
ParticipantIsn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
August 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM #722738profhoff
ParticipantIsn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
August 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #723154ocrenter
Participant[quote=profhoff]Isn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
Another Leucadia Blog post[/quote]
So this is the reason why the lots weren’t touched even back at the peak of the bubble. Afterall, very possible for a developer back in the days to have built 4000+ homes that would have gone for $1.5 mil easy. Wonder if city venture knew about the problems when they purchased.
August 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #722791ocrenter
Participant[quote=profhoff]Isn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
Another Leucadia Blog post[/quote]
So this is the reason why the lots weren’t touched even back at the peak of the bubble. Afterall, very possible for a developer back in the days to have built 4000+ homes that would have gone for $1.5 mil easy. Wonder if city venture knew about the problems when they purchased.
August 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #722635ocrenter
Participant[quote=profhoff]Isn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
Another Leucadia Blog post[/quote]
So this is the reason why the lots weren’t touched even back at the peak of the bubble. Afterall, very possible for a developer back in the days to have built 4000+ homes that would have gone for $1.5 mil easy. Wonder if city venture knew about the problems when they purchased.
August 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #722033ocrenter
Participant[quote=profhoff]Isn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
Another Leucadia Blog post[/quote]
So this is the reason why the lots weren’t touched even back at the peak of the bubble. Afterall, very possible for a developer back in the days to have built 4000+ homes that would have gone for $1.5 mil easy. Wonder if city venture knew about the problems when they purchased.
August 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #721941ocrenter
Participant[quote=profhoff]Isn’t the City Ventures Leucadia Collection the development with the toxic soil issue?
Another Leucadia Blog post[/quote]
So this is the reason why the lots weren’t touched even back at the peak of the bubble. Afterall, very possible for a developer back in the days to have built 4000+ homes that would have gone for $1.5 mil easy. Wonder if city venture knew about the problems when they purchased.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.