- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 5 months ago by .
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
As was mentioned before, the Federal Reserve works for the financial system — not you and me. By the way, they also have the dual role of regulating the financial industry. Their main role is to ensure the integrity of the banking system. They will not let lenders colapse left and right.
Then they shouldn’t have allowed interest only loans, they shouldn’t have allowed 100% financing either, because banks will collapse left and right. Also, if rates were higher, people would be more likely to save their money, and earn a higher interest rate, and they would be less likely to borrow money at a higher interest rate.
Housing prices would then be much more consistent, and less volatile(they wouldn’t be so inflated, so yes, they would be much lower) and anyone with some common sense and patience, would be able to save up for a reasonable down payment, buy a home at a reasonable price, and have a reasonable mortgage in which the PRINCIPLE debt actually gets paid off.
… But that wouldn’t help the lenders book record profits from originating, repackaging, selling and servicing loans; and the excutives wouldn’t get hundred-million dollar salaries. I’m afraid that the taxpayers will end-up bailing out the banks like we bailed out the S&Ls in the 1990s.
Couldn’t agree with you more Perry. It is the golden rule, those with the gold rule.
SD Realtor