you haven’t made any point… what, do you go to the school of pre hoc argument?
the posted link starts off with a logical fallacy. period. it’s trying to claim that the presented arguments are fact and truth because it’s sources are factual and truthful. and that’s wrong. it’s not a “relativism trap”, it’s pointing out that the author is using slight of hand when making his case: scientists never lie. scientists say that global warming is occuring. therefore, global warming must be true. see what happened there? it is not a fact that scientists never lie. it is not a fact that his sources are objective and unbiased.
