The only thing typical CostaMesa is your response. It’s typical of someone who hates being questioned.
I expressed neither preference nor affilitation toward any type of political/social group, party, organization. But you start tossing out labels when there isn’t really anywhere to be tossing them.
I suggested early on that you know how things work (the context was the structure and responsibilites of the various branches of the federal government) before you start making statements (adds validity to your position not necessarily a bad thing is it?).
I then stated that unless you seek information from another perspective (the other side of the coin or edges and giving the concession of forgoing objectivity) that the your reasoning and therefore any conclusion is faulty.
Why does that threaten you?
That is “slamming” someone? If you think this is “slamming” someone then you must live a very sheltered life. Your response actually adds validity to the point I was pursuing.
