Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Temecula at 70-80/SQ foot???
- This topic has 120 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM #14733January 2, 2009 at 11:23 AM #322594EugeneParticipant
Ouch.
43880 Brookhaven backs up against the 79, but there’s also this in the same community, for 30K more:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33734-Pebble-Brook-Cir-92592/home/12506633
Both houses were originally sold in 2005 in high 500’s.
January 2, 2009 at 11:23 AM #322939EugeneParticipantOuch.
43880 Brookhaven backs up against the 79, but there’s also this in the same community, for 30K more:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33734-Pebble-Brook-Cir-92592/home/12506633
Both houses were originally sold in 2005 in high 500’s.
January 2, 2009 at 11:23 AM #323000EugeneParticipantOuch.
43880 Brookhaven backs up against the 79, but there’s also this in the same community, for 30K more:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33734-Pebble-Brook-Cir-92592/home/12506633
Both houses were originally sold in 2005 in high 500’s.
January 2, 2009 at 11:23 AM #323017EugeneParticipantOuch.
43880 Brookhaven backs up against the 79, but there’s also this in the same community, for 30K more:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33734-Pebble-Brook-Cir-92592/home/12506633
Both houses were originally sold in 2005 in high 500’s.
January 2, 2009 at 11:23 AM #323097EugeneParticipantOuch.
43880 Brookhaven backs up against the 79, but there’s also this in the same community, for 30K more:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Temecula/33734-Pebble-Brook-Cir-92592/home/12506633
Both houses were originally sold in 2005 in high 500’s.
January 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM #322600AecetiaParticipantNice upgrades.
January 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM #322944AecetiaParticipantNice upgrades.
January 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM #323005AecetiaParticipantNice upgrades.
January 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM #323022AecetiaParticipantNice upgrades.
January 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM #323102AecetiaParticipantNice upgrades.
January 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #322605outtamojoParticipantThanks, for your observation, that house must get a LOT of dust.
January 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #322949outtamojoParticipantThanks, for your observation, that house must get a LOT of dust.
January 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #323010outtamojoParticipantThanks, for your observation, that house must get a LOT of dust.
January 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #323027outtamojoParticipantThanks, for your observation, that house must get a LOT of dust.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.