SK in Cv et al with Electability Definition

User Forum Topic
Submitted by aldante on January 13, 2012 - 4:35pm

Here is my definition of who is electable.....At least in Virginia, Ron Paul and Mittens are while the other four are not........

http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/13/politics/v...
ie....its pretty hard to be "Electable" when you can't get on the ballot

Or Sk.....we can all use your "analysis", maybe the write in's will prove your point on who is electable.

‹ Reccomendation needed for a good CPA--in or near Mira Mesa OT: CPA Continuing Education ›

aldante wrote: Or Sk.....we
Submitted by all on January 13, 2012 - 5:11pm.

aldante wrote:

Or Sk.....we can all use your "analysis", maybe the write in's will prove your point on who is electable.

RTFA
Virginia state law specifically prohibits voters from writing in candidates not on the ballot in primary elections.

Captcha, I guess that gives
Submitted by aldante on January 14, 2012 - 7:20am.

Captcha,
I guess that gives SK in cv less outs.

Captcha, I guess that gives
Submitted by aldante on January 14, 2012 - 7:20am.

Captcha,
I guess that gives SK in cv less outs.

So you're saying that because
Submitted by SK in CV on January 14, 2012 - 8:01am.

So you're saying that because RP might come in 2nd place in Virgina, that's evidence that he's electable in a general election?

Sorry.

Fail.

The ACLU is challenging the
Submitted by harvey on January 14, 2012 - 10:04am.

The ACLU is challenging the Constitutionality of the Virgina election laws.

I don't know why they are bothering, since everyone knows that Ron Paul is the sole authority on the Constitution - why don't they just ask him?

None of this will matter though - an old saying captures the situation quite well:

"Nobody remembers second place"

SK in CV wrote:So you're
Submitted by aldante on January 14, 2012 - 1:47pm.

SK in CV wrote:
So you're saying that because RP might come in 2nd place in Virgina, that's evidence that he's electable in a general election?

Sorry.

Fail.

HAHA

The BURN The Burn!!! Sorry SK I simply could not resist!!
Ta ta

aldante wrote:Here is my
Submitted by markmax33 on January 15, 2012 - 10:49am.

aldante wrote:
Here is my definition of who is electable.....At least in Virginia, Ron Paul and Mittens are while the other four are not........

http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/13/politics/v...
ie....its pretty hard to be "Electable" when you can't get on the ballot

Or Sk.....we can all use your "analysis", maybe the write in's will prove your point on who is electable.

SK and PRI are going to feel really silly when they are the only 2 left on the blog claiming his unelectabilty and he wins his first state. It's then going to be that he can't win 2 states and it will keep building. Eventually their ideas will expire or they will. I'll guarantee Ron Paul feels younger than either of them! They should study Ron Paul's financial base but I think that's above them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.