Shiller a long-term semi bull ?

User Forum Topic
Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on November 3, 2008 - 8:56am

Never thought I would see this day. Shiller claims stocks are roughly at fair value from a long-term earnings point of view. Now, he expects significant downside, but ...

"If you buy now and wake up in 10 years, you'll probably get a return around the historic average," said Yale economist Robert Shiller.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on November 3, 2008 - 8:58am.

Here is the article where I saw the quote:

http://tinyurl.com/bullshill

Submitted by cr on November 3, 2008 - 9:17am.

Assuming of course the economy doesn't implode in the next 2 years.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on November 3, 2008 - 10:12am.

cooprider wrote:
Assuming of course the economy doesn't implode in the next 2 years.

Actually, Shiller predicted the housing led-slowdown and economic implosion, but still says this.

Submitted by davelj on November 3, 2008 - 11:17am.

FormerSanDiegan wrote:
Never thought I would see this day. Shiller claims stocks are roughly at fair value from a long-term earnings point of view. Now, he expects significant downside, but ...

"If you buy now and wake up in 10 years, you'll probably get a return around the historic average," said Yale economist Robert Shiller.

Yep, this makes sense. It mirrors what Jeremy Grantham has been saying recently.

If you start with a 3% dividend yield, normalize earnings and get 5% annualized earnings growth with a normalized P/E of 14-15, you wake up with an 8% annualized return on stocks over the next decade. This compares to the 10-Year Treasury yield of 4%. 400 bps of equity risk premium is as good as we've seen in 20 years.

I agree that stocks will head lower at some point, but if you're looking out long term, the risk-return trade-off for stocks versus bonds is pretty good right now. That's just the math speaking.

Submitted by peterb on November 3, 2008 - 11:20am.

10 years is a long time to have one of the biggest investments one ever makes just sit there or go down. Then throw in that it "will probably" have risen...
I think Someone got to Shiller and told him to "cool it with the reality stuff".

Submitted by Russell on November 3, 2008 - 2:31pm.

I think Someone got to Shiller and told him to "cool it with the reality stuff".

"Summing it up, the market as a whole is priced for good long-term returns, but it could end up priced for great returns down the road. Meanwhile, certain sectors within the market are priced for great returns already."

Rich Toscano
http://www.pcasd.com/us_stock_market_now...

I think Rich got the memo too, peterb.

Submitted by peterb on November 3, 2008 - 4:22pm.

Yes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on "gold and gold stocks" as well as the "US stock market is now priced for good returns" are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we're at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on November 3, 2008 - 4:25pm.

peterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.

Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.

Submitted by Russell on November 3, 2008 - 4:28pm.

Hey, I was just joking peterb.Rich sounds reasonable, with good arguments and fair caveats.

Submitted by peterb on November 3, 2008 - 4:51pm.

Time will tell. But everything I'm observing and the analysis I find most accurate tells me to stay mostly in US$. It's a trend that has legs as the planet unwinds from the biggest credit bubble burst in it's history. I honestly think that gold could get to $600 and the S&P to 600 by mid-2009.
Unemployment in CA is at 7.7%, 6.1% in the USA. A lot more mortgage defaults are headed towards us. Lay-off announcements are dominating PR releases. Credit card defaults are looking to break records as well. I dont see any positive news on the horizon. I'd wait for a sign or two of a reversal before going long on anything right now. But that's just me. I'm convervative.

Submitted by gandalf on November 4, 2008 - 12:02am.

I'm somewhere in between Shiller and peterb.

Not about to go long yet, but I think we'll manage to get through this. Widespread difficulties in the months ahead, lots of pitfalls that could send us into a deep funk. OTH, if we reinvent the energy industry, cheap and renewable, I think the economy comes roaring back.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on November 4, 2008 - 8:55am.

I don't disagree completely with peterb either. If one has been out of the market I think this is a great time to start dollar-cost-averaging back in over the next 1-2 years to get back to whatever portion of your retirement (long-term money) portfolio you plan to have in stocks for the next 10-20 years.

Still, a hefty cash allocation (for me it's 40%) is important for stability and to play a little defense.
Also, if you want to use the money within the next 5 years or less (e.g. to buy a home, start a business, etc) I would not put it in stocks.

Submitted by Russell on November 4, 2008 - 11:27am.

Maybe it will be good timing to get serious about college funds for those of us with young children?

Submitted by peterb on November 4, 2008 - 1:19pm.

Just look at the volitility of the market lately. This is not my idea of stability. Dip a toe back into the market after it's shown a couple months of solid behavior. And even then, just a taste. And in another month, if it's behaving, get some more....etc... at least this way, you're not over exposed if it crashes. The odds of a lot more bad news coming in 2009 is about 90%, IMO. So be careful out there. The US$ is a great place to be right now despite how it may feel.