Poll: Should 2nd amendment be repealed?

Submitted by squat300 on December 31, 2012 - 11:04am
Yes
13% (6 votes)
Yes, but with lesser limited gun rights
6% (3 votes)
No
34% (16 votes)
No, you'll have to pry it from my cold dead hand
21% (10 votes)
Yes and I would donate money to such a cause.
13% (6 votes)
No and I think it would cause a violent uprising among the armed citizens
13% (6 votes)
Total votes: 47
‹ Something I never understood about tax rates. ot; fat wins! ›
Looks close but insufficient
Submitted by squat300 on January 1, 2013 - 11:29am.

Looks close but insufficient to carry a constitutional amendment.

My wife is opposed but open to argument. However she wants to go to a range and try shooting this year before we repeal it. I fear if she gets a taste for it she'll never be persuadable.

Ah well

Need a name fOr the group
Submitted by squat300 on January 1, 2013 - 3:02pm.

Need a name fOr the group that is catchy like

NRA but different

It might be easier to get
Submitted by all on January 1, 2013 - 3:49pm.

It might be easier to get five guys to interpret the 2nd amendment differently than to repeal it.

squat300 wrote:Looks close
Submitted by no_such_reality on January 1, 2013 - 4:06pm.

squat300 wrote:
Looks close but insufficient to carry a constitutional amendment.

My wife is opposed but open to argument. However she wants to go to a range and try shooting this year before we repeal it. I fear if she gets a taste for it she'll never be persuadable.

Ah well

15 - 10 against is close? That's 60/40 for a no vote.

no_such_reality
Submitted by squat300 on January 1, 2013 - 6:07pm.

no_such_reality wrote:
squat300 wrote:
Looks close but insufficient to carry a constitutional amendment.

My wife is opposed but open to argument. However she wants to go to a range and try shooting this year before we repeal it. I fear if she gets a taste for it she'll never be persuadable.

Ah well

15 - 10 against is close? That's 60/40 for a no vote.

Vote count changed was 50/50. I think if I could raise $50 million I could persuade America and move the numbers

I don't know, it took the
Submitted by no_such_reality on January 2, 2013 - 9:17am.

I don't know, it took the union's $100 Million on Prop 32 to persuade just Cali.

and the NRA's pockets are deep.

Currently, all categories of
Submitted by LuckyInOC on January 3, 2013 - 10:22am.

Currently, all categories of 'No' has all categories of 'Yes' beat. 69% - 31% or 2:1

squat300 wrote: Vote count
Submitted by dumbrenter on January 3, 2013 - 10:39am.

squat300 wrote:
Vote count changed was 50/50. I think if I could raise $50 million I could persuade America and move the numbers

If the 5 Yes votes that would put up money contribute $10 million each, you have your start up fund for "persuasion" squat!

Not going to happen.
Submitted by Aecetia on January 4, 2013 - 1:43pm.

Not going to happen.

more than 1/3 say NO GUNS AT
Submitted by squat300 on January 5, 2013 - 11:26am.

more than 1/3 say NO GUNS AT ALL. if the question were more moderate, say, severely limit gun rights, perhaps we could swing it...

squat300 wrote:more than 1/3
Submitted by LuckyInOC on January 5, 2013 - 1:04pm.

squat300 wrote:
more than 1/3 say NO GUNS AT ALL. if the question were more moderate, say, severely limit gun rights, perhaps we could swing it...

Doesn't #2 fit what you are saying?

Just because you repeal the 2nd amendment, does not mean there would be no guns allowed at all. Repealing the 2nd Amendment would not mean a total ban on all guns?

Lucky In OC

shoulda been "no, but with
Submitted by squat300 on January 5, 2013 - 2:59pm.

shoulda been "no, but with very limited gun rights". I fear people may fear amending the constitution.