![]() | ||||||
San Diego Housing Bubble News and Analysis |
||||||
~Navigation~~User login~~RSS~ |
no agent; going alone...any caveats?User Forum Topic
Submitted by scaredycat on November 2, 2008 - 10:10am
I'm thinking I don't want to use an agent. I'm following the market in a small area and have some sense of what's going on. the agents I talk to sound like they just want to talk me into making a quick offer close to the asking price and that now now now is the time. What compelling reason is there to use an agent? I figure their cut could be used toward lowering the overall price.
|
~Finance and investing~*Investment advisory services and securities offered through Girard Securities, Inc., member SIPC/FINRA. ~Recent articles~~Active forum topics~
Sponsored Links
|
||||
| © 2004-2008 piggington enterprises llc | terms of use | privacy policy | powered by Drupal | ||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||
Find an agent that understands you are going to be making low-ball offers. This is how you can feel-out the market over time. Just keep probing the price sensativity with offers. You'll get a feel for reality after about 4 months of this. Then you can plan accordingly as to your strategy. This is what I do when I'm serious about an area that I want to own in. You find deals by making offers.
Quite often the person they put in the open house may be a new agent or hungry for new clients. Utilizing this has worked well for me in the past.
Real estate agent / client relations are like any other relationship in that water seeks its own level. No experienced, capable agent is going to lay it on the line for someone who is likely going to run them around and kick them to the curb. When you get an decent agent , they will listen to you and bring their experience to patiently serve your interests, as if they were their own. Whether you need one or not depends on the level of self representation you are capable of and your interest in doing it.
If you want an agent, ask people you know, who have recent experience with agents, what that person is like to work with. Right now you should be able to find someone who says their agent has been honest about the market and who has applied no pressure. Hooking up with agents randomly probably won't get you what you would want.
Thinking that a good agent is going to mindlessly write low ball offers is a trap. There is nothing wrong with writing low balls but some properties are better targets than others. Make sure you are ready to take good feedback about that.Don't trash an agent because they have concerns with writing a lowball on a turnkey property that just came on the market priced around recent comps.
Rustico makes some good points here.
I would also caution the line of thought that you could get a lower price by cutting out a buyer's agent. The listing contract the seller signs explicitly gives that cut to the listing agent in such a case. In other words, the seller's advocate gets paid double and you get to work with someone who may not have your interests at heart. I have only ever seen one exception.
Further, I recommend that you have a friend who recently bought a place give you their copy of the complete file. My files typically run to 400 pages or so and so I give them to clients on CD. The forms will help you gain some familiarity with the complex issues that come up.
And really feel free to ask agents for help on an uncompensated basis. Bear in mind though that it is free advice.
Good luck to you.
I'm in escrow on my first home purchase and I did all the research myself, so I didn't see that paying a buyer's agent 3% was money well spent. I went with Redfin. They refund you 2/3rds of the buyers agent commission. In my case it was a 2% back to me, cash. I'm not getting paid by Redfin, but I have been very satisfied so far. I think standard buyer's agents in general are massively overpaid.
Like scaredycat, I started exploring what an agent can do for me.
Last week I interviewed a young realtor and came away with one concern which made me doubt his fiduciary responsibility to me as his client.
He said his commission is 3% of listing, and the seller’s agent also gets 3% of listing, and their payment is already included in the Listing Price. Is this usual?
Also, because his payment is already figured into the LP, wouldn’t he be reluctant to submit my lowball offer? If accepted, he would get less than if I paid asking …or is it in his best interest just to get the sale even if that means he gets less money?
this is his first experience with a down cycle, and he said the majority of his time would be spent actively searching listings in real time... I guess Redfin can only get me so far?
Any comments would be appreciated.
Rus and UR make good points... and to add anothre caviot I showed homes to 3 different people today. On two of the homes I found the slab to be cracked, in one case significantly. These were both REO homes. I noticed step cracks in both homes and by simply removing the carpets it yielded results. I highly doubt any listing agent or agent holding an open house will do that for you.
I have had a few people come to me after using redfin. If all you are looking for is a simple commission rebate there are alot of people out there who will work with you on that.
Similarly you should want an agent who wants to act as your advocate, not sell you a home. My view on agency is that the agent should provide you information that is unbiased. Whether a sale is made or not should not be of consequence. If you test your agent and they say it is a good time to buy now then I would walk away immediately. That simple litmus test alone should help you filter out most of them, including Redfin agents. If you want agents with quality then you can find them. An honest agent will say that even though the market will head lower (depending on the location) if you want to buy then I will help you as best that I can. It appears to me that the realtors posting here seem to be more then capable and quite honest. I have not done any direct business with any of them but the tone of honesty and straight forwardness seems consistent. Even though he has not posted here in awhile Jim Klinge is a really good guy as well.
Buying a home is not rocket science and if you feel capable enough, then by all means go for it. I feel pretty capable in most endeavors I undertake, even those that are non real estate related or non engineering related (those two being my specialty) yet when it comes to large investments that will affect my life for many years to come, I don't mind investing in a some expertise to help me out.
Last week I interviewed a young realtor and came away with one concern which made me doubt his fiduciary responsibility to me as his client.
He said his commission is 3% of listing, and the seller’s agent also gets 3% of listing, and their payment is already included in the Listing Price. Is this usual?
This is almost uniformly practiced.
While the seller pays the buyer agent, the cost is reflected, more or less in the purchase price.
Generally buyers will not use a buyer's agent if they have to shoulder the cost of the representation.
Also, because his payment is already figured into the LP, wouldn’t he be reluctant to submit my lowball offer? If accepted, he would get less than if I paid asking …or is it in his best interest just to get the sale even if that means he gets less money?
When I submit an offer that is lowball, my only reticence is that it will be a waste of my time and my buyer's energy. That is very relevant because a discouraged buyer may decide to take a year off looking for property or may blame me for the offer's rejection (similar to how seller's blamed agents for properties not selling in 2005).
Generally buyer agents (I cant speak for every cheeseball agent)try to represent their client's interest. Often that means lowering the contract price. This does not usually lower the commission amount significantly. For example, if I can knock 20k off my clients purchase price, that will cost me about $420 before taxes are considered. That amount refers to 3% gross buyer side commission (a common amount) on the $20k portion with a 30% cut to the house (my brokerage's share for overhead). I would gladly accept a slightly smaller commission that was more certain and would result in goodwill and repeat business rather than hurt my own reputation for a small increase on a less certain commission (better deals are exponentially more likely to close). For example on a $400,000 purchase price this would mean the difference between about $8400 and about $8000. Again I can't speak for every agent but 5% of my paycheck is not enough for me to put my name at risk (and, as agents, that's really all we have to trade on).
On the other hand a major reduction in price means a war story and lots of referral business. I offered $530k for a place listed for $630k. They came back asking for $545k. That client's referrals and that story presented to other buyers got me far more money than the 85k reduction in price cost me. Also, my buyer would not have bought at the asking price.
this is his first experience with a down cycle, and he said the majority of his time would be spent actively searching listings in real time... I guess Redfin can only get me so far?
Any comments would be appreciated.
If you want an idea of how to avoid this potential conflict, try this:
Approach an agent. Agree to a buyer broker relationship that specifies a certain dollar amount rather than a percentage. If he makes more, then he credits it to you at close. If he makes less, you pay the difference at closing. Make sure the dollar amount is at market rate. For example, if you intend to spend $300k, make the dollar amount 9k even. Then his only concern is representing your interests.
As an agent, I would have no problem with this. I don't think many would.