Hoping for that quick $$$

User Forum Topic
Submitted by waterboy on August 16, 2007 - 11:35am

So I ask your opinion on what you think will be the next mainstream money maker that the American public becomes enamored with and pumps all their $$$ into?

Just recently we’ve had the rise & fall of tech, and now the rise & fall of real estate.

Its been interesting to see how many people decided to actively participate in those. People leaving good jobs to work at tech companies in hopes of cashing in on those options (most never did). Opening up E*TRADE accounts and picking tech stocks based on a magazine article or a cnbc segment (some had never owned a stock but were now willing to put 10s of thousands into this account). Average neighbor down the street purchasing multiple homes trying to renovate & flip (first one might have gone ok but what about the 2 they are still holding onto).

Some have had a long career that involves tech or real estate and most likely played it smart throughout. Even some novices to both booms did proper research weren’t greedy and knew when it was time to cash out….they too made some great profits. But as we know, a majority were too late to the game or should have never played their hand as they were far from educated about the process and risks involved and their actions might have well been labeled gambling.

So back to my original question…..What will be the next boom that will end up going bust for the majority?

Submitted by lindismith on August 16, 2007 - 12:37pm.

The green movement is growing.

I think people are hot on that as it ties into everything that's wrong with our living culture right now.

Submitted by drunkle on August 16, 2007 - 12:40pm.

corn is pretty expensive atm... farmers converting their crops to corn might be a problem.

Submitted by lindismith on August 16, 2007 - 1:26pm.

Yeah, I think a lot of people will get burned on the ethanol movement.

But Green is coming. I think a recession will actually kick it into high gear because people will be forced to think about conservation and sustainablity.

Submitted by POZ on August 16, 2007 - 1:54pm.

Snake oil--have you heard of it!!!

Submitted by citydweller on August 16, 2007 - 11:33pm.

Solar Power, which I guess is actually part of the green movement. It seems like a no brainer, especially here in Southern California. Hopefully it won't be hi-jacked by the scammers, the way real estate was.

Submitted by cashman on August 17, 2007 - 12:27am.

Hate to be a party pooper, but for the record, real estate hasn't fallen......yet.

Submitted by flu on August 17, 2007 - 4:51am.

It's anyone's guess.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on August 17, 2007 - 9:25am.

Hate to be a party pooper, but for the record, real estate hasn't fallen......yet.

Huh ? What planet are you on ?

You didn't get the memos ?

1. CNN: Prices drop nationwide for the 4th straight quarter according to the NAR of all sources.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/15/real_est...

2. Case-Shiller Index down.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/3...

3. San Diego Prices off about 8% per C-S
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007...

4. Prices down per square foot
http://piggington.com/july_housing_data_...

Oh yeah, I almost forgot. What about the rest of the RE market. Let's see... Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX)is off about 24% since February.

Submitted by sdnativeson on August 17, 2007 - 9:56am.

IMHO a recession won't help the green movement, a worsening economy and the rising costs of food, well people would rather eat than worry about the type of fuel they use.

Look to the third world for examples. Poverty is a big cause of pollution. Maybe that would be a better focus for the "Green" organizations. (Maybe the term "Green" really stands for all the cash to be made?)

I read somewhere (can't remember, sorry!) where the author voiced his opinion that the next bubble object will be oil. Look to Wall Street to start running that up. I guess you could expand that to any "energy" source with the exception of nuclear.

Submitted by lindismith on August 17, 2007 - 11:07am.

if it gets really bad, people growing their own food, and conserving their energy use will be about as green as it gets!

And with an oil spike, people will seek alternatives. I have friends using straight vegetable oil in their diesel cars right now, and they run. I'm not joking.

Poverty is a big cause of pollution.

Actually humans are a big cause of pollution, rich or poor.

Submitted by kewp on August 17, 2007 - 11:55am.

I would buy one of these today if they were available.

http://www.flytheroad.com/

Might even consider getting a place out in Alpine and commuting to the coast when I need too, would be fun!

Submitted by sdnativeson on August 17, 2007 - 12:22pm.

If they have a place to grow their own food. Growing enough food for a family of four will be a little difficult for many, not something done in a few pots or planters on the patio, not to mention the seasonal constraints.

From the little I know(been saying THAT a lot lately) to run a diesel on straight veggie oil requires some big modifications, and doesn't do well in cold climates.

Not everyone can afford to modify their cars for alternative fuels, or buy new ones.

http://www.cartalk.com/content/features/...

"First, vegetable oil comes entirely as a renewable resource that's grown right here in the US. That reduces our dependence on foreign oil.

Vegetable oil also reduces most tailpipe emissions, but actually increases the smog-increasing nitrous oxides compared to regular diesel.

However, when you factor in the fossil fuel normally used to grow the plants used to make vegetable oil, the results are less encouraging. When the "lifecycle" of the fuel is considered, using pure vegetable oil actually increases the pollution to the atmosphere by about 35%.

On the upside, vegetable oil does reduce the amount of "air toxics" and soot released into the atmosphere, compared to regular diesel fuel.

Of course, if you're using vegetable oil that would normally be tossed in the dumpster, then you're definitely helping to save the planet. "

Lol, while the statement " humans are a big cause of pollution, rich or poor" is true it's also somewhat....
supercilious.

Loads of articles, studies on the topic, do a search.
Here is a couple of links;
http://www.worldbank.org/research/greeni...
http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv...

Submitted by drunkle on August 17, 2007 - 12:34pm.

speaking of supercilious:

"Look to the third world for examples. Poverty is a big cause of pollution. Maybe that would be a better focus for the "Green" organizations. (Maybe the term "Green" really stands for all the cash to be made?)"

you're a fountain of ignorance and hubris. the third world countries known as America, China, Canada, Russia, Japan... all top of the heap in terms of pollution.

Submitted by lindismith on August 17, 2007 - 12:41pm.

yeah, I agree it would be hard to grow one's own food. But in times of great need, people will resort to it.

My Father grew up in England during the War. They had a chicken coop and a vegetable garden. They grew as much as possible. They had no heart to kill their own chickens, so they would swap them with their neighbors so they weren't actually killing the ones they had grown fond of.

It's this kind of good old-fashioned ingenuity that needs to come back to this country. We are a disposable society, that throws away everything and values nothing. If credit had been harder to get, we wouldn't be in this housing mess.

Submitted by sdnativeson on August 17, 2007 - 3:20pm.

drunkle, I've found a match for my ignorance, yours. As far as hubris - between the two of us that is primarily your gift. If you cannot entertain other ideas (even though supported by some of your enviros) that is a problem that is yours solely.

I'm getting close to thinking that you constantly demean/degrade the U.S. because of the misguided mentality it makes you look "sophisticated". There are possible reasons none that are particularly flattering. I will say though, you are consistent.

There is a lot of information by all type of organizations that address the point I stated. I don't think any of them
(haven't read all, forgive me) say that any countries are exempt from pollution. "Pollution" covers a vast amounts and sources of contaminants.

lindismith, I completely agree with your observation.

Submitted by cashman on August 17, 2007 - 3:34pm.

What I meant in response to "the rise and fall of real estate" is that the cycle hasn't completed itself, like the dot.com bust. Just a technicallity, as I know we are well underway. But it's too soon to gloat about the fall of real estate as we don't really know where it's going to end up. Actually in my area prices have not budged. Sad.

Submitted by FormerSanDiegan on August 17, 2007 - 3:42pm.

Thanks for clarifying cashman. You had me worried for a minute.

Submitted by Ex-SD on August 17, 2007 - 4:11pm.

Since Countrywide has 10,796 homes for sale on their website (today) and 2361 are in CA...........and since they are in serious need of cash....................you can bet that they're gathering up the firewood to start the fire sale any day now. They're going to have to really chop those prices if they want to move those homes. Many more foreclosures are coming over the next year back to Countrywide and other lenders and all of them will want to get them off their books because they're sure not generating anything but more lost $$$ when they're just sitting there empty.

So, my point is....although some areas have already fallen 20% and others have not shown much or any drop as of yet.............no zip code will be immune from the fallout when these foreclosures really start hitting the market at serious price reductions.............that's when the term, "falling prices" will have some real meaning in the housing market.

Submitted by guitar187 on August 17, 2007 - 4:24pm.

China

Submitted by drunkle on August 17, 2007 - 4:44pm.

that's rich. literally. preach "responsibility" to the poor while denouncing your own.

"it's poor people's fault there's pollution! what? nevermind my landfills, poor people suck!"

Submitted by flu on August 17, 2007 - 8:54pm.

China

 

I wouldn't. It's too late. You folks think things here are irrationale??? Some of the loans over there makes all the ALT-A and mortgage fraud that occur here look like child's play. As a foreign investor in China right now, you will get burned. 

Submitted by sdnativeson on August 18, 2007 - 10:45am.

Who is preaching? Certainly not me. I made no comment to either denounce or waive any responsibility on my own personal part. You're twisting comments way out of proportion, I just don't know if it's deliberate or not.

Where do you come up with this crap? Is it that you are so caught up in yourself that you mirror that onto any comment that you find challenging your preset beliefs?

Submitted by flu on August 18, 2007 - 4:07pm.

I would buy one of these today if they were available. http://www.flytheroad.com/ Might even consider getting a place out in Alpine and commuting to the coast when I need too, would be fun!

 

This one is what I want http://www.teslamotors.com/ It exists, unfortunately, just slightly out of my price range :) Guess though I wouldn't be participating in any endurance race.

50% deposit guarentees you the to be on the next 1000 batch.
http://www.teslamotors.com/buy/buyPage1.php

Submitted by lindismith on August 18, 2007 - 6:18pm.

Those cars are hot. That's the know-how this country needs!

Submitted by kewp on August 18, 2007 - 7:34pm.

Those cars are hot. That's the know-how this country needs!

The problem with full electrics are that assuming your power source is from fossil fuel, they are a net loss from an environmental perspective. Too much energy is lost in getting the power from the plant to the batteries. Not to mention, those cells have a finite cycle life and can't be recycled, as far as I know.

Submitted by flu on August 18, 2007 - 8:33pm.

The problem with full electrics are that assuming your power source is from fossil fuel, they are a net loss from an environmental perspective. Too much energy is lost in getting the power from the plant to the batteries. Not to mention, those cells have a finite cycle life and can't be recycled, as far as I know.

 

I would say that there are probably alternatives to generating electric that are cleaner. Hydroelectric, wind, solar etc. Plus i would also say nuclear to electric.

However, I would agree that disposal of the Li-Ion batteries are going to be an issue. I'm not sure if this is really better for the environment. Less dependent on foreign oil, possibly. Better for the environment. Not sure.

However, I'm not a big fan of hybrids. I don't think the fuel savings are worth it.

 

If I had the money, I'd seriously consider a tesla roadster. Aside from no gas, the torque curve of this car is amazing. Essentially a flat torque from 0-6000 rpm. Instant "on" the moment you step on the gas (uh I mean accelerator). This will eat just about any sports car alive.

http://www.teslamotors.com/performance/a... Lotus is building this roadster for tesla. So the quality should be decent.

 

Unfortunately, $100k is just too steep. I hope tesla builds a sedan thats more "affordable". I believe the mentioned the possibility of a sedan in the future for about $50k. However, I doubt this company will last. There's already some management changes going on, and Im not sure if their really going to penetrate this market even with a $50k sedan.

There are other alternatives. GM is apparently working on something called the Chevy Volt.

Details are here.

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/15/gm-ma...

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt

Car will start at $30k, but battery not included (seriously).
GM is considering letting the customer "lease" the battery.

In general, if you are interested in green(er) vehicles, autobloggreen has a wealth of information on what is going on. (no I'm not advertising for them, just a car nut).

 

Submitted by CostaMesa on August 18, 2007 - 8:34pm.

A Lotus Elise with an extra 650 pounds? Heresy. Colin Chapman is rolling in his grave...

Submitted by bsrsharma on August 18, 2007 - 8:35pm.

What will be the next boom

I heard that the ones (investor kind) who made a killing in the  housing bubble are looking into speculation in farmland as the next "growth opportunity".  Another one is "clean water opportunity" which is basically rights to water source  for cities. Just think of Enron and Electricity deregulation.