Clairemont under 300k!

User Forum Topic
Submitted by jpinpb on May 3, 2008 - 5:37pm

Okay. Clairemont is not PB, LJ, Carmel Valley or 4S, but I think of it as the median for San Diego. For spring, I am surprised to see this reduction in price:

No photos. Haven't been by yet. Surely not in good shape, admitting a fixer:

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086032645-30...

Bank owned
MLS# 086032645
Listed: 05/02/2008
Price: $269,900
Beds/Baths: 2 / 2
Square Feet: 900 sf
PPSF: $300
Lot Size: 5,900 sf

This other one is funny. We've been watching it:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-081024047-28...

Listed: 03/22/2008
Beds/Baths: 3 / 1
Square Feet: 925 sf
Lot Size: 5,600 sf
Price History:
Price Reduced: 03/05/2008 from $530,000-$559,000 to $499,000
Price Reduced: 02/16/2008 from $550,000-$579,000 to $530,000-$559,000
Price Reduced: 12/14/2007 from $580,000 to $579,000
Price Increased: 11/29/2007 from $480,000 to $580,000

Sales History
Date Price Held Return Annual
08/30/2006 $455,000 n/a - -

Submitted by jpinpb on May 3, 2008 - 6:03pm.

Another interesting one is this. Hard to imagine, looking back, how really crazy it was, but back in October 2005, someone actually paid 705k for this:

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086011534-34...

MLS# 086011534
Listed: 02/11/2008
3476 Idlewild Way
Status: Sale Pending
Price: $475,000
Beds/Baths: 6 / 3
Square Feet: 2,088 sf
PPSF: $227
Lot Size: 6,000 sf

If it's spring, the shopping season, and we're seeing these drops, what will it be like year-end when we have more inventory and people aren't shopping? This is impressive for SFH.

Submitted by PadreBrian on May 3, 2008 - 7:20pm.

I like that area. Sure the arteries are 1950's standards, but good views on the right lots and centrally located.

This is a working class area. The prices should reflect that. NOT 750k for a fracking 1950 post war tract shoebox.

Submitted by nostradamus on May 3, 2008 - 8:04pm.

IMO much of SD is like that. You can either buy new houses packed tightly together on tiny lots like sardines or you can buy old, manufactured-looking houses on larger lots but which need lots and lots of updating. That is, IF you can afford to buy!

We need a home design renaissance.

Submitted by jpinpb on May 4, 2008 - 8:18am.

A poster was tracking this particular condo conversion in Clairemont which is now 50% off:

was this: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-076054614-66...

now this: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086031475-66...

Are condos really a sign of what's to come?

Submitted by Rustico on May 4, 2008 - 8:44am.

Are condos really a sign of what's to come?

Are Encanto or El Cajon detached houses a sign of things to come? I just see Clairemont as so much more desirable than those places . If it continues to fall I would get very interested. Given my bargain hunting sweat equity mentality(that I think is shared by a few posters on this thread),I think it would be a good idea to be more concerned with the lot than the house in Clairemont. When and if this area become more important, which certainly seems should occur, the bigger/better lot is going to be a big plus for rebuilding or expanding the house, or for appreciation based on this potential.

Submitted by jpinpb on May 4, 2008 - 9:17am.

Rustico - I agree on lot size for sure. Way more potential to build up and out. I don't watch condos there, but somebody posted it and it caught my eye b/c I always thought condos are the first to go and then houses follow, though I did post those houses to indicate what's happening, in the spring, no less.

Submitted by jpinpb on May 8, 2008 - 10:39am.

Latest hit in Clairemont. Only 24% off peak BUT 168 ppsf.

A short sale that actually went through.

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-084023996-27...

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-59F43BD...

Submitted by sdduuuude on May 8, 2008 - 2:32pm.

One rule of thumb in Clairemont I have is that anything with a 1-car garage is in a crappy neighborhood. I have found few exceptions, though the 1-car garages near the transition to the better neighborhoods are a little better.

Another rule of thumb is - a house on a canyon lot will cost about $40-$50K more than exact same house on a non-canyon lot across the street.

The links above all represent the low end of Clairemont, though it appears the corn is finally starting to pop in the lower end of Clairemont. I would almost classify them as condos.

Submitted by jpinpb on May 18, 2008 - 5:55pm.

5257 Barstow St sold for 285k, 37% off peak.

http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-8267932...

Submitted by PadreBrian on May 18, 2008 - 6:02pm.

Nice, very close to the 2003 price point.